LITTLE DORRIT AND THE STRUCTURE OF BELIEF

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM Literature and Theology Pub Date : 2023-09-13 DOI:10.1093/litthe/frad026
Winter Jade Werner
{"title":"<i>LITTLE DORRIT</i> AND THE STRUCTURE OF BELIEF","authors":"Winter Jade Werner","doi":"10.1093/litthe/frad026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article probes the famous metaphor from Little Dorrit when Amy Dorrit is called the ‘vanishing point’ in Arthur’s ‘poor story’. Considering in conjunction with theories of perspectival drawing, belief, and ‘representative thinking’, it suggests the metaphor of the vanishing point for Charles Dickens yields a broader ethical argument regarding how one might engage with the beliefs of others. Rather than simply endorsing or rejecting others’ beliefs based on their grounding in empirical reality, Dickens suggests there is distinct moral value in maintaining and cultivating other’s beliefs—even the most ungrounded beliefs—rather than reflexively exploding them.","PeriodicalId":43172,"journal":{"name":"Literature and Theology","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literature and Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/litthe/frad026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article probes the famous metaphor from Little Dorrit when Amy Dorrit is called the ‘vanishing point’ in Arthur’s ‘poor story’. Considering in conjunction with theories of perspectival drawing, belief, and ‘representative thinking’, it suggests the metaphor of the vanishing point for Charles Dickens yields a broader ethical argument regarding how one might engage with the beliefs of others. Rather than simply endorsing or rejecting others’ beliefs based on their grounding in empirical reality, Dickens suggests there is distinct moral value in maintaining and cultivating other’s beliefs—even the most ungrounded beliefs—rather than reflexively exploding them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小多莉特和信仰的结构
摘要本文探讨了《小多莉特》中艾米·多莉特在亚瑟王的“悲惨故事”中被称为“消失点”的著名隐喻。结合透视绘画、信仰和“代表性思维”的理论,它表明查尔斯·狄更斯的消失点的隐喻产生了一个关于一个人如何与他人的信仰接触的更广泛的伦理争论。狄更斯认为,与其基于经验现实简单地赞同或拒绝他人的信仰,还不如坚持和培养他人的信仰——即使是最没有根据的信仰——而不是反射性地推翻它们,这是一种独特的道德价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Literature and Theology, a quarterly peer-review journal, provides a critical non-confessional forum for both textual analysis and theoretical speculation, encouraging explorations of how religion is embedded in culture. Contributions should address questions pertinent to both literary study and theology broadly understood, and be consistent with the Journal"s overall aim: to engage with and reshape traditional discourses within the studies of literature and religion, and their cognate fields - biblical criticism, literary criticism, philosophy, politics, culture studies, gender studies, artistic theory/practice, and contemporary critical theory/practice.
期刊最新文献
Fears and joys of writing in the fiction of Roberto Bolaño Unfinished forgiveness: dynamics of Igbo cosmology and Christian theology in Chigozie Obioma’s An Orchestra of Minorities The ethico-religiousness of Atwood’s “God’s Gardeners” vis-à-vis Kierkegaard’s thought The Charge of God: Laudato Si’ read through Chesterton, Wordsworth, and Hopkins Correction to: Feminist Storytelling and the Problem of White Feminism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1