“Marriage fraud” or social constraint? Reasons for understanding tongzhi and tongqi in mixed‐orientation marriages in China

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Sociology Compass Pub Date : 2023-09-13 DOI:10.1111/soc4.13143
Changhui Song, Runze Ding, Hui Xie
{"title":"“Marriage fraud” or social constraint? Reasons for understanding <i>tongzhi</i> and <i>tongqi</i> in mixed‐orientation marriages in China","authors":"Changhui Song, Runze Ding, Hui Xie","doi":"10.1111/soc4.13143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This qualitative study was conducted in the context of ongoing debates on “marriage fraud” to explore the underlying social structural and individual reasons for entering mixed‐orientation marriages affecting men who have sex with men ( tongzhi in Chinese) and non‐complicit women ( tongqi ) who married tongzhi in China. Using a phenomenological approach, sixty‐eight (34 tongzhi and 34 tongqi, unpaired) semi‐structured interviews were conducted through in‐person interviews or WeChat audio interviews between 2018 and 2019 in China. Guided by thematic analysis, three themes explaining the shared pressure from the societal, family, and individual levels that drove individuals' decisions about whom they partnered with, and when and how they entered marriage among tongzhi and tongqi : marriage normativity, filial piety, and conformity with conventional marriage. The findings showed that marital decisions for tongzhi and tongqi were constrained by the similar social power of marriage normativity, filial piety, and heteronormativity in China. Some marriages fell within the scope of marriage fraud, but most of them fell within the scope of performing conventional marriages. This phenomenon was beyond simple explanations of marriage fraud. Future studies need to investigate multi‐level constraints concerning family relations for sexual minorities in China on a large scale.","PeriodicalId":47997,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Compass","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This qualitative study was conducted in the context of ongoing debates on “marriage fraud” to explore the underlying social structural and individual reasons for entering mixed‐orientation marriages affecting men who have sex with men ( tongzhi in Chinese) and non‐complicit women ( tongqi ) who married tongzhi in China. Using a phenomenological approach, sixty‐eight (34 tongzhi and 34 tongqi, unpaired) semi‐structured interviews were conducted through in‐person interviews or WeChat audio interviews between 2018 and 2019 in China. Guided by thematic analysis, three themes explaining the shared pressure from the societal, family, and individual levels that drove individuals' decisions about whom they partnered with, and when and how they entered marriage among tongzhi and tongqi : marriage normativity, filial piety, and conformity with conventional marriage. The findings showed that marital decisions for tongzhi and tongqi were constrained by the similar social power of marriage normativity, filial piety, and heteronormativity in China. Some marriages fell within the scope of marriage fraud, but most of them fell within the scope of performing conventional marriages. This phenomenon was beyond simple explanations of marriage fraud. Future studies need to investigate multi‐level constraints concerning family relations for sexual minorities in China on a large scale.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“婚姻欺诈”还是社会约束?理解中国混合取向婚姻中的“同妻”和“同妻”的原因
摘要本定性研究是在“婚姻欺诈”争论不断的背景下进行的,旨在探讨影响中国男同性恋者(中文称为“同妻”)和与同妻结婚的非同谋女性(“同妻”)进入混合取向婚姻的潜在社会结构和个人原因。采用现象学方法,在2018年至2019年期间,通过面对面访谈或微信音频访谈,在中国进行了68次(34名同妻和34名同妻,未配对)半结构化访谈。在主题分析的指导下,三个主题解释了来自社会、家庭和个人层面的共同压力,这些压力驱动了“同妻”和“同妻”之间的个人决定他们的伴侣,以及他们何时和如何进入婚姻的决定:婚姻规范、孝道和对传统婚姻的遵从。研究结果表明,在中国,“同妻”和“同妻”的婚姻决策受到婚姻规范、孝道和异性恋规范等类似社会力量的制约。有些婚姻属于婚姻欺诈的范围,但大多数属于履行传统婚姻的范围。这种现象超出了对婚姻欺诈的简单解释。未来的研究需要在更大的尺度上对中国性少数群体的家庭关系进行多层次的约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociology Compass
Sociology Compass SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
102
期刊最新文献
Critical Challenges to the Sociology of Work: From a Perspective of Russian Labor Studies Visual Analysis and the Contentious Politics of the Radical Right Caring Technologies: Confronting Invisible Work in Digital Capitalism Unlocking the Potential of the Decolonial Approach in Migration Studies Everyday Conversations About Economic Inequality: A Research Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1