Re-evaluation of local anesthesia transtympanic electrical auditory brainstem response in cochlear implant candidacy

Daniel Polterauer, Giacomo Mandruzzato, Maike Neuling, Marek Polak, Joachim Müller, John Martin Hempel
{"title":"Re-evaluation of local anesthesia transtympanic electrical auditory brainstem response in cochlear implant candidacy","authors":"Daniel Polterauer, Giacomo Mandruzzato, Maike Neuling, Marek Polak, Joachim Müller, John Martin Hempel","doi":"10.1515/cdbme-2023-1183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: The trans-tympanic electrically evoked auditory brainstem response measurement in local anesthesia (= LA-TT-EABR) has been shown as a useful tool in doubtful CI candidacy to objectively evaluate the excitability of the auditory pathway up to the brainstem. Previous studies in this matter were of relatively low subjects number. To update the knowledge of the reliability of LA-TTEABR, we re-evaluated the latest results from a bigger subjects dataset from our clinic and follow up regarding hearing sensation post-operatively. Methods: LA-TT-EABR was performed, as described in previous publications, with a trans-tympanic golf-club electrode in the round window niche for pre-operative stimulation in local anesthesia and with an evoked potential device for EABR recording. Hearing sensations were monitored in the implanted CI subjects. Results: 39 of 40 planned subjects were included in this study. In 22 subjects, a positive LA-TT-EABR was recorded. In 11 subjects, the response was insecure. In 6 subjects, no response was recorded. One subject was excluded because of pain during the paracentesis. Among them, 19 were implanted with a CI, and 18 had hearing sensations with a hearing prosthesis post-operative. The sensitivity and specificity of LA-TTEABR in estimating the excitability of the auditory nerve preoperatively are both 100%. Conclusion: LA-TT-EABR was shown as a reliable pre-operative test to objectively evaluate the auditory brainstem response. In addition to LA-TT-EABR, an analysis of the auditory cortex using LA-TT-EALR may provide correlation and confirmation of LA-TT-EABR results and additional information about cortical reorganization after long deafness.","PeriodicalId":10739,"journal":{"name":"Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2023-1183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: The trans-tympanic electrically evoked auditory brainstem response measurement in local anesthesia (= LA-TT-EABR) has been shown as a useful tool in doubtful CI candidacy to objectively evaluate the excitability of the auditory pathway up to the brainstem. Previous studies in this matter were of relatively low subjects number. To update the knowledge of the reliability of LA-TTEABR, we re-evaluated the latest results from a bigger subjects dataset from our clinic and follow up regarding hearing sensation post-operatively. Methods: LA-TT-EABR was performed, as described in previous publications, with a trans-tympanic golf-club electrode in the round window niche for pre-operative stimulation in local anesthesia and with an evoked potential device for EABR recording. Hearing sensations were monitored in the implanted CI subjects. Results: 39 of 40 planned subjects were included in this study. In 22 subjects, a positive LA-TT-EABR was recorded. In 11 subjects, the response was insecure. In 6 subjects, no response was recorded. One subject was excluded because of pain during the paracentesis. Among them, 19 were implanted with a CI, and 18 had hearing sensations with a hearing prosthesis post-operative. The sensitivity and specificity of LA-TTEABR in estimating the excitability of the auditory nerve preoperatively are both 100%. Conclusion: LA-TT-EABR was shown as a reliable pre-operative test to objectively evaluate the auditory brainstem response. In addition to LA-TT-EABR, an analysis of the auditory cortex using LA-TT-EALR may provide correlation and confirmation of LA-TT-EABR results and additional information about cortical reorganization after long deafness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部麻醉经鼓室脑干电听反应在人工耳蜗候选中的再评价
摘要:局部麻醉下的跨鼓室电诱发听觉脑干反应测量(= LA-TT-EABR)已被证明是一种有用的工具,可以客观地评估到脑干的听觉通路的兴奋性。以往关于这方面的研究,受试者数量相对较少。为了更新对LA-TTEABR可靠性的认识,我们重新评估了来自我们诊所的更大受试者数据集的最新结果,并随访了术后听力感觉。方法:LA-TT-EABR,如之前的出版物所述,在局部麻醉下,在圆窗位置使用一个跨鼓室高尔夫球棒电极进行术前刺激,并使用诱发电位装置进行EABR记录。对植入CI的受试者进行听力监测。结果:40名计划受试者中有39人纳入本研究。22例受试者LA-TT-EABR阳性。在11名受试者中,他们的反应是不安全的。6名受试者无反应记录。1名受试者因穿刺时疼痛而被排除。其中19例植入人工耳蜗,18例术后使用助听器恢复听力。LA-TTEABR在术前估计听神经兴奋性的敏感性和特异性均为100%。结论:LA-TT-EABR是一种客观评价听脑反应的可靠的术前检查。除了LA-TT-EABR之外,使用LA-TT-EALR对听觉皮层进行分析可能会提供LA-TT-EABR结果的相关性和确认,以及长期耳聋后皮层重组的额外信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
239
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Stability of cell adhesion noise analysis for the detection of cancer cell lines Consideration of Kv ion channels as firstorder systems Photovoltaic Stimulation Induces Overdrive Suppression in Embryonic Chicken Cardiomyocytes Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Water Level Tank and Human Fluid Flow ECG Beat classification: Impact of linear dependent samples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1