Scientific Article Writing: Will ChatGPT Help?

Q1 Arts and Humanities Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii Pub Date : 2023-09-13 DOI:10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-8-9-24-47
I. M. Zashikhina
{"title":"Scientific Article Writing: Will ChatGPT Help?","authors":"I. M. Zashikhina","doi":"10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-8-9-24-47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of artificial intelligence language services has raised hopes related to facilitating the task of publication activity. Members of the academic community wondered whether chatbots could optimize the process of scientific writing. ChatGPT, a language model capable of, among other things, generating scholarly texts, received particular attention. The cases of writing academic papers using ChatGPT have led to a number of publications analyzing the pros and cons of using this neural network. In this paper, we investigate the possibility of using ChatGPT to write an introduction to a scientific paper on a topical issue of the Arctic governance. A set of queries to ChatGPT network, based on the logic of the commonly accepted in academia publication format IMRAD, has being developed. This format is characterized by structural and functional elements, which served as a logical basis for the queries. The responses received from ChatGPT were analyzed for their compliance with the requirements for a scientific article, according to the IMRAD publication format. The result of the analysis showed that ChatGPT is not able to meet the requirements for publishing a scientific article in the modern scientific publication discourse.","PeriodicalId":37083,"journal":{"name":"Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-8-9-24-47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence of artificial intelligence language services has raised hopes related to facilitating the task of publication activity. Members of the academic community wondered whether chatbots could optimize the process of scientific writing. ChatGPT, a language model capable of, among other things, generating scholarly texts, received particular attention. The cases of writing academic papers using ChatGPT have led to a number of publications analyzing the pros and cons of using this neural network. In this paper, we investigate the possibility of using ChatGPT to write an introduction to a scientific paper on a topical issue of the Arctic governance. A set of queries to ChatGPT network, based on the logic of the commonly accepted in academia publication format IMRAD, has being developed. This format is characterized by structural and functional elements, which served as a logical basis for the queries. The responses received from ChatGPT were analyzed for their compliance with the requirements for a scientific article, according to the IMRAD publication format. The result of the analysis showed that ChatGPT is not able to meet the requirements for publishing a scientific article in the modern scientific publication discourse.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学文章写作:聊天技术会有帮助吗?
人工智能语言服务的出现为促进出版活动的任务带来了希望。学术界的成员想知道聊天机器人是否可以优化科学写作的过程。ChatGPT,一种能够生成学术文本的语言模型,受到了特别的关注。使用ChatGPT撰写学术论文的案例已经导致许多出版物分析了使用这种神经网络的利弊。在本文中,我们研究了使用ChatGPT撰写关于北极治理主题问题的科学论文的介绍的可能性。基于学术界普遍接受的出版物格式IMRAD的逻辑,开发了一套对ChatGPT网络的查询。这种格式的特点是结构和功能元素,它们作为查询的逻辑基础。根据IMRAD的出版格式,我们分析了从ChatGPT收到的回复是否符合科学文章的要求。分析结果表明,ChatGPT不能满足现代科学出版话语中发表科学文章的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii
Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
期刊最新文献
Mechanisms for Activating the Personal Potential of Students in the Context of Digitalization of University Education Russia’s State Policy on the Development of Science at Universities: Lessons from the 90s Image of Higher Educational Institutions: Features of Perception by Graduating Class Students The ADDIE Model in Instructional Design: NUST MISIS Case Study Online Education after the Pandemic: Student Problems and Opportunities Research Using Big Data Tools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1