The Public-Educational Musings of Benjamin Britten: Toward A Post-Critical Love For Classical Music

Lierin Buelens, Joris Vlieghe, Thomas De Baets, Wiebe Sieds Koopal
{"title":"The Public-Educational Musings of Benjamin Britten: Toward A Post-Critical Love For Classical Music","authors":"Lierin Buelens, Joris Vlieghe, Thomas De Baets, Wiebe Sieds Koopal","doi":"10.2979/pme.2023.a909309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: In this paper we discuss the musical work of classical composer Benjamin Britten as a lasting legacy for public music education. Our starting point is the contemporary urgency to rethink both public music education in general, and the public-educational significance of Western classical music in particular, in the face of the dual threats posed by anti-educational tendencies of “functionalization” and “hobbyfication.” Relating this situation to concerns already voiced by Britten in his time, we consider in what ways aspects of Britten’s musical work can be shown to reveal a highly original, post-critical answer to these threats. While his pedagogical musings remain riddled with ambiguities, which readily invite critical deconstruction, our paper argues for the more affirmative option of reconceptualizing these ambiguities as constitutive tensions of a public-educational love for (classical) music. To gauge the practical implications of such a post-critical music-educational love, we analyze the concrete case of the Aldeburgh Festival , perhaps Britten’s most full-fledged effort to reclaim music as a public affair. Thinking about this case, we reflect on how Britten’s legacy could lastingly impinge on the publicness of Western classical music, as well as on ongoing and future practices of public music education in general.","PeriodicalId":43479,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Music Education Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy of Music Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/pme.2023.a909309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: In this paper we discuss the musical work of classical composer Benjamin Britten as a lasting legacy for public music education. Our starting point is the contemporary urgency to rethink both public music education in general, and the public-educational significance of Western classical music in particular, in the face of the dual threats posed by anti-educational tendencies of “functionalization” and “hobbyfication.” Relating this situation to concerns already voiced by Britten in his time, we consider in what ways aspects of Britten’s musical work can be shown to reveal a highly original, post-critical answer to these threats. While his pedagogical musings remain riddled with ambiguities, which readily invite critical deconstruction, our paper argues for the more affirmative option of reconceptualizing these ambiguities as constitutive tensions of a public-educational love for (classical) music. To gauge the practical implications of such a post-critical music-educational love, we analyze the concrete case of the Aldeburgh Festival , perhaps Britten’s most full-fledged effort to reclaim music as a public affair. Thinking about this case, we reflect on how Britten’s legacy could lastingly impinge on the publicness of Western classical music, as well as on ongoing and future practices of public music education in general.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本杰明·布里顿的公共教育思考:走向对古典音乐的后批判之爱
摘要:本文讨论了古典作曲家本杰明·布里顿作为公共音乐教育永恒遗产的音乐作品。我们的出发点是,面对“功能化”和“业余化”的反教育倾向所构成的双重威胁,当代迫切需要重新思考公共音乐教育,特别是西方古典音乐的公共教育意义。将这种情况与布里顿在他的时代已经表达的担忧联系起来,我们考虑布里顿音乐作品的哪些方面可以显示出对这些威胁的高度原创,后批判的回答。虽然他的教学思想仍然充满了模糊性,这很容易引起批判性的解构,但我们的论文主张将这些模糊性重新概念化为公共教育对(古典)音乐的爱的构成性紧张的更肯定的选择。为了衡量这种后批判音乐教育之爱的实际含义,我们分析了奥尔德堡音乐节的具体案例,这可能是布里顿将音乐作为公共事务的最全面的努力。考虑到这个案例,我们反思布里顿的遗产如何能够持久地影响西方古典音乐的公共性,以及目前和未来的公共音乐教育实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Opening Up to the Unexpected: Reclaiming Emotion and Power in the Public Space of Music Education 中国音乐教育与国际音乐教育 [Chinese Music Education and International Music Education] by Jianhua Guan (review) Music for All or Partisan Advocacy? Exploring Socialized Epistemologies Musik–Vielfalt–Integration–Inklusion: Musikdidaktik für die eine Schule [Music–Diversity–Inclusion–Integration: A New Philosophy of Music Education for an Inclusive School] by Irmgard Merkt (review) Editorial Reflections on Philosophizing in Music Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1