Validation of the six-minute walking distance measured by FeetMe® insoles

Andrey Mostovov, Damien Jacobs, Leila Farid, Paul Dhellin, Guillaume Baille
{"title":"Validation of the six-minute walking distance measured by FeetMe® insoles","authors":"Andrey Mostovov, Damien Jacobs, Leila Farid, Paul Dhellin, Guillaume Baille","doi":"10.1186/s44247-023-00038-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The six-minute walk test (6MWT) is widely used to assess functional capacity in patients with various diseases. Use of wearable devices can make this test more accurate and easier to administer, and may even enhance it by providing additional information. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of FeetMe® insoles for assessing the total six-minute walking distance (6MWD) by comparing the FeetMe® estimates and those obtained by a rater to the ground truth measured with a surveyor’s wheel. Results Data were analyzed from healthy volunteers who performed the 6MWT on 10-m and 30-m tracks while wearing FeetMe® insoles ( n = 32), and being simultaneously assessed by a rater ( n = 33) and followed by an investigator with a surveyor’s wheel. The mean average error (MAE) of the estimates was below 13 m on both tracks for FeetMe®, whereas it ranged from 16.24 m to 38.88 m on the 30-m and 10-m tracks for the rater. Conclusion The FeetMe® insoles provided a more accurate estimate and showed greater agreement with the ground truth than the rater, and the accuracy of the FeetMe® estimates did not vary according to the track length. We conclude that the FeetMe insoles are a valid solution for measuring the 6MWD.","PeriodicalId":72426,"journal":{"name":"BMC digital health","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44247-023-00038-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Background The six-minute walk test (6MWT) is widely used to assess functional capacity in patients with various diseases. Use of wearable devices can make this test more accurate and easier to administer, and may even enhance it by providing additional information. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of FeetMe® insoles for assessing the total six-minute walking distance (6MWD) by comparing the FeetMe® estimates and those obtained by a rater to the ground truth measured with a surveyor’s wheel. Results Data were analyzed from healthy volunteers who performed the 6MWT on 10-m and 30-m tracks while wearing FeetMe® insoles ( n = 32), and being simultaneously assessed by a rater ( n = 33) and followed by an investigator with a surveyor’s wheel. The mean average error (MAE) of the estimates was below 13 m on both tracks for FeetMe®, whereas it ranged from 16.24 m to 38.88 m on the 30-m and 10-m tracks for the rater. Conclusion The FeetMe® insoles provided a more accurate estimate and showed greater agreement with the ground truth than the rater, and the accuracy of the FeetMe® estimates did not vary according to the track length. We conclude that the FeetMe insoles are a valid solution for measuring the 6MWD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证由FeetMe®鞋垫测量的6分钟步行距离
摘要背景6分钟步行试验(6MWT)被广泛用于评估各种疾病患者的功能能力。使用可穿戴设备可以使这项测试更准确,更容易管理,甚至可以通过提供额外的信息来增强它。本研究的目的是通过比较FeetMe®估计值和评估者获得的估计值与测量轮测量的地面真实值,来评估FeetMe®鞋垫评估总6分钟步行距离(6MWD)的有效性。结果分析了健康志愿者的数据,这些志愿者穿着FeetMe®鞋垫在10米和30米的轨道上进行6MWT (n = 32),同时由评估师(n = 33)进行评估,并由带测量轮的调查员进行跟踪。FeetMe®在两条轨道上的平均误差(MAE)均低于13 m,而在30米和10米轨道上的平均误差在16.24 m至38.88 m之间。结论:与rater相比,FeetMe®鞋垫提供了更准确的估计,与地面事实更一致,并且FeetMe®估计的准确性不随轨道长度而变化。我们得出结论,FeetMe鞋垫是测量6MWD的有效解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Potential sources of inaccuracy in the Apple watch series 4 energy expenditure estimation algorithm during wheelchair propulsion From an idea to the marketplace: identifying and addressing ethical and regulatory considerations across the digital health product-development lifecycle Efficacy of digital interventions on physical activity promotion in individuals with noncommunicable diseases: an overview of systematic reviews Software symptomcheckR: an R package for analyzing and visualizing symptom checker triage performance Introduction and content analysis of "Nurse's voice" WhatsApp group during COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1