The concept of decentralization through time and disciplines: a quantitative exploration

IF 3 2区 计算机科学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS EPJ Data Science Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00418-1
Gabriele Di Bona, Alberto Bracci, Nicola Perra, Vito Latora, Andrea Baronchelli
{"title":"The concept of decentralization through time and disciplines: a quantitative exploration","authors":"Gabriele Di Bona, Alberto Bracci, Nicola Perra, Vito Latora, Andrea Baronchelli","doi":"10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00418-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Decentralization is a pervasive concept found across disciplines, including Economics, Political Science, and Computer Science, where it is used in distinct yet interrelated ways. Here, we develop and publicly release a general pipeline to investigate the scholarly history of the term, analysing $425{,}144$ <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"> <mml:mn>425</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>144</mml:mn> </mml:math> academic publications that refer to (de)centralization . We find that the fraction of papers on the topic has been exponentially increasing since the 1950s. In 2021, 1 author in 154 mentioned (de)centralization in the title or abstract of an article. Using both semantic information and citation patterns, we cluster papers in fields and characterize the knowledge flows between them. Our analysis reveals that the topic has independently emerged in the different fields, with small cross-disciplinary contamination. Moreover, we show how Blockchain has become the most influential field about 10 years ago, while Governance dominated before the 1990s. In summary, our findings provide a quantitative assessment of the evolution of a key yet elusive concept, which has undergone cycles of rise and fall within different fields. Our pipeline offers a powerful tool to analyze the evolution of any scholarly term in the academic literature, providing insights into the interplay between collective and independent discoveries in science.","PeriodicalId":11887,"journal":{"name":"EPJ Data Science","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPJ Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00418-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Decentralization is a pervasive concept found across disciplines, including Economics, Political Science, and Computer Science, where it is used in distinct yet interrelated ways. Here, we develop and publicly release a general pipeline to investigate the scholarly history of the term, analysing $425{,}144$ 425 , 144 academic publications that refer to (de)centralization . We find that the fraction of papers on the topic has been exponentially increasing since the 1950s. In 2021, 1 author in 154 mentioned (de)centralization in the title or abstract of an article. Using both semantic information and citation patterns, we cluster papers in fields and characterize the knowledge flows between them. Our analysis reveals that the topic has independently emerged in the different fields, with small cross-disciplinary contamination. Moreover, we show how Blockchain has become the most influential field about 10 years ago, while Governance dominated before the 1990s. In summary, our findings provide a quantitative assessment of the evolution of a key yet elusive concept, which has undergone cycles of rise and fall within different fields. Our pipeline offers a powerful tool to analyze the evolution of any scholarly term in the academic literature, providing insights into the interplay between collective and independent discoveries in science.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
时间和学科的分权概念:定量探索
分权是一个广泛存在于各个学科的概念,包括经济学、政治学和计算机科学,它以不同但相互关联的方式被使用。在这里,我们开发并公开发布了一个通用的管道来调查这个术语的学术历史,分析$425{,}$425,144学术出版物提到(去)中心化。我们发现,自20世纪50年代以来,关于这一主题的论文比例呈指数级增长。2021年,154位作者中有1位在文章标题或摘要中提到(去)中心化。利用语义信息和引文模式,对不同领域的论文进行聚类,并对它们之间的知识流动进行表征。我们的分析表明,该主题在不同领域独立出现,交叉学科污染较小。此外,我们展示了区块链如何在大约10年前成为最有影响力的领域,而治理在20世纪90年代之前占据主导地位。总之,我们的研究结果为一个关键但难以捉摸的概念的演变提供了定量评估,该概念在不同领域经历了兴衰周期。我们的管道提供了一个强大的工具来分析学术文献中任何学术术语的演变,提供对科学中集体发现和独立发现之间相互作用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EPJ Data Science
EPJ Data Science MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
53
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EPJ Data Science covers a broad range of research areas and applications and particularly encourages contributions from techno-socio-economic systems, where it comprises those research lines that now regard the digital “tracks” of human beings as first-order objects for scientific investigation. Topics include, but are not limited to, human behavior, social interaction (including animal societies), economic and financial systems, management and business networks, socio-technical infrastructure, health and environmental systems, the science of science, as well as general risk and crisis scenario forecasting up to and including policy advice.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of home detection algorithms using smartphone GPS data What relational event models can reveal: Commentary on Thomas Grund’s “Dynamics of Denunciation: The Limits of a Scandal” On the duration of face-to-face contacts Computational social science with confidence Public perception of generative AI on Twitter: an empirical study based on occupation and usage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1