Market reaction to mandatory sustainability disclosures: evidence from Singapore

IF 3.9 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Applied Accounting Research Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1108/jaar-02-2023-0060
Jerry Chen
{"title":"Market reaction to mandatory sustainability disclosures: evidence from Singapore","authors":"Jerry Chen","doi":"10.1108/jaar-02-2023-0060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to investigate the equity market reaction to sustainability disclosure measures derived from firms' inaugural sustainability reports following the implementation of mandatory sustainability reporting in Singapore.Design/methodology/approachThis study explores the equity market reaction to first-time sustainability reports of mandatory adopters and compares the reactions between voluntary and mandatory adopters. To mitigate any imbalanced distribution effects, entropy balancing techniques are employed.FindingsThe author observes a significant equity market reaction when mandatory adopters adhere to a reporting framework and release sustainability reports as standalone documents. Additionally, the study indicates that government regulation amplifies the equity market reaction for companies that include a board statement within their sustainability reports and present them as standalone publications.Research limitations/implicationsThe lack of quantitative information disclosed in the first-time sustainability reports may restrict the generalizability of the findings.Practical implicationsThe findings provide valuable insights for organizations and managers to evaluate the market's response to sustainability disclosures and improve communication effectiveness with investors. Furthermore, the study has direct policy implications for global standard-setting organizations in sustainability reporting. The findings support the notion that investors value market-led and investor-focused sustainability disclosures.Originality/valueThe study contributes to the limited body of research that examines the capital market effects of mandatory sustainability disclosures. To the author’s knowledge, this is among a few studies to directly investigate the equity market reaction to mandatory sustainability disclosures at the firm level.","PeriodicalId":46321,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Accounting Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-02-2023-0060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to investigate the equity market reaction to sustainability disclosure measures derived from firms' inaugural sustainability reports following the implementation of mandatory sustainability reporting in Singapore.Design/methodology/approachThis study explores the equity market reaction to first-time sustainability reports of mandatory adopters and compares the reactions between voluntary and mandatory adopters. To mitigate any imbalanced distribution effects, entropy balancing techniques are employed.FindingsThe author observes a significant equity market reaction when mandatory adopters adhere to a reporting framework and release sustainability reports as standalone documents. Additionally, the study indicates that government regulation amplifies the equity market reaction for companies that include a board statement within their sustainability reports and present them as standalone publications.Research limitations/implicationsThe lack of quantitative information disclosed in the first-time sustainability reports may restrict the generalizability of the findings.Practical implicationsThe findings provide valuable insights for organizations and managers to evaluate the market's response to sustainability disclosures and improve communication effectiveness with investors. Furthermore, the study has direct policy implications for global standard-setting organizations in sustainability reporting. The findings support the notion that investors value market-led and investor-focused sustainability disclosures.Originality/valueThe study contributes to the limited body of research that examines the capital market effects of mandatory sustainability disclosures. To the author’s knowledge, this is among a few studies to directly investigate the equity market reaction to mandatory sustainability disclosures at the firm level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
市场对强制性可持续发展信息披露的反应:来自新加坡的证据
本研究旨在探讨新加坡实施强制性可持续发展报告后,股票市场对公司首份可持续发展报告所衍生的可持续发展披露措施的反应。本研究探讨了股票市场对强制性采用者首次发布可持续发展报告的反应,并比较了自愿采用者和强制性采用者的反应。为了减轻不平衡分布的影响,采用了熵平衡技术。当强制性采用者坚持报告框架并将可持续发展报告作为独立文件发布时,作者观察到显著的股票市场反应。此外,该研究表明,政府监管放大了在可持续发展报告中包含董事会声明并将其作为独立出版物呈现的公司的股票市场反应。研究限制/影响第一次可持续性报告中披露的数量信息的缺乏可能限制研究结果的普遍化。研究结果为组织和管理者评估市场对可持续发展信息披露的反应,提高与投资者的沟通效率提供了有价值的见解。此外,该研究对可持续发展报告的全球标准制定组织具有直接的政策意义。研究结果支持了投资者重视市场导向和以投资者为中心的可持续性披露的观点。原创性/价值本研究为检验强制性可持续性披露对资本市场的影响的有限研究做出了贡献。据作者所知,这是直接调查股票市场对公司层面强制性可持续性披露的反应的少数研究之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Accounting Research provides a forum for the publication of high quality manuscripts concerning issues relevant to the practice of accounting in a wide variety of contexts. The journal seeks to promote a research agenda that allows academics and practitioners to work together to provide sustainable outcomes in a practice setting. The journal is keen to encourage academic research articles which develop a forum for the discussion of real, practical problems and provide the expertise to allow solutions to these problems to be formed, while also contributing to our theoretical understanding of such issues.
期刊最新文献
Greenhouse gas assurance and carbon emission performance in light of the auditor’s reputation and the country’s development level A mixed methods study of influences on perceived budgeting accuracy in UK universities Corporate culture's influence on the transparency of financial reporting in Iran: an in-depth analysis of readability and tone Earnings quality among private firms: evidence from the ELITE context The impact of board gender diversity on firm performance: does critical mass matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1