Beyond research as a dirty word? Searching for ethical and reflexive ways of doing research with and for migrant communities

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Migration Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1093/migration/mnad027
Tara Fiorito
{"title":"Beyond research as a dirty word? Searching for ethical and reflexive ways of doing research with and for migrant communities","authors":"Tara Fiorito","doi":"10.1093/migration/mnad027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract What do “white” migration researchers, such as myself, need to learn from over-researched (undocumented) migrant youth and indigenous communities that consider research a dirty word? And how do such assertions not lead to an impasse, but can actually enable scholars to conduct ethical and reflexive research that directly engages and benefits migrant communities throughout the research process? These are the central questions I seek to take up in this article by critically reflecting on my engaged research with undocumented migrant youth (activists) in Los Angeles and the Netherlands. Building on epistemological and ethical considerations and practices from participatory action research, co-creative research, and arts-based research, this article argues for four essential shifts in our modes of knowledge production, which are then empirically illustrated through a critical examination of my own research. These four shifts are: (1) a move from epistemic violence and injustice to epistemic justice, (2) a move from damage-centred to desire-based research, (3) a move from singular to comprehensive narratives, and (4) a move from extractavist to engaged research.","PeriodicalId":46309,"journal":{"name":"Migration Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Migration Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnad027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract What do “white” migration researchers, such as myself, need to learn from over-researched (undocumented) migrant youth and indigenous communities that consider research a dirty word? And how do such assertions not lead to an impasse, but can actually enable scholars to conduct ethical and reflexive research that directly engages and benefits migrant communities throughout the research process? These are the central questions I seek to take up in this article by critically reflecting on my engaged research with undocumented migrant youth (activists) in Los Angeles and the Netherlands. Building on epistemological and ethical considerations and practices from participatory action research, co-creative research, and arts-based research, this article argues for four essential shifts in our modes of knowledge production, which are then empirically illustrated through a critical examination of my own research. These four shifts are: (1) a move from epistemic violence and injustice to epistemic justice, (2) a move from damage-centred to desire-based research, (3) a move from singular to comprehensive narratives, and (4) a move from extractavist to engaged research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越“研究”这个肮脏的词?寻找与移民社区一起进行研究的道德和反思的方法
像我这样的“白人”移民研究人员需要从过度研究(无证)的移民青年和认为研究是一个肮脏的词的土著社区中学到什么?这些断言如何不会导致僵局,而实际上使学者能够在整个研究过程中进行直接参与并使移民社区受益的伦理和反思研究?这些是我在这篇文章中试图通过批判性地反思我对洛杉矶和荷兰的无证移民青年(活动家)的研究来解决的核心问题。本文以参与性行动研究、共同创造研究和艺术研究的认识论和伦理考虑和实践为基础,论证了我们的知识生产模式的四个基本转变,然后通过对我自己研究的批判性检查进行实证说明。这四个转变是:(1)从认识暴力和不公正转向认识正义,(2)从以伤害为中心的研究转向以欲望为基础的研究,(3)从单一叙述转向全面叙述,(4)从提取主义研究转向参与式研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Migration Studies
Migration Studies DEMOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Migration shapes human society and inspires ground-breaking research efforts across many different academic disciplines and policy areas. Migration Studies contributes to the consolidation of this field of scholarship, developing the core concepts that link different disciplinary perspectives on migration. To this end, the journal welcomes full-length articles, research notes, and reviews of books, films and other media from those working across the social sciences in all parts of the world. Priority is given to methodological, comparative and theoretical advances. The journal also publishes occasional special issues.
期刊最新文献
Immigrants’ subjective well-being in Europe: Variation by regional attitudes towards immigrants Reflexive reciprocity under an ethics of care: Reflections from the field for refugee studies Determinants of return migration of Estonian young adults in transnational mobility Exploring urban co-presence and migrant integration on Beirut’s seafront Winners and losers from occupational segregation across Europe: the role of gender and migration status
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1