Correlation of eGFR values estimated by different equations based on creatinine and cystatin-C in patients on hemodialysis treatment at Teaching Hospital Karapitiya, Galle, Sri Lanka

Udani A. Wanniarachchi, Sachinthi S. Amarasiri, Anoja P. Attanayake
{"title":"Correlation of eGFR values estimated by different equations based on creatinine and cystatin-C in patients on hemodialysis treatment at Teaching Hospital Karapitiya, Galle, Sri Lanka","authors":"Udani A. Wanniarachchi, Sachinthi S. Amarasiri, Anoja P. Attanayake","doi":"10.4038/cjs.v52i4.8093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study was to compare eGFR values estimated from different equations based on creatinine and cystatin-C in patients on hemodialysis treatment. eGFR values were calculated using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology equations based on Creatinine (CKD-EPICr) and cystatin-C values alone (CKDEPI Cys C) and by their combination (CKD-EPICr-Cys C), using 40 pre-dialysis samples. No significant differences in renal function parameters and eGFR were observed, either between male (55%) and female (45%) patients or within different age groups (p>0.05). Certain levels of agreement (p>0.05) were observed between the equations, except for the values derived from CKD-EPICys C and CKD-EPICr-Cys C (p = 0.022). Significant positive correlations were observed between all selected equations. The highest correlation was observed between CKD-EPICr and MDRD (r = 0.998, p = 0.000), whereas the lowest correlation was found between MDRD and CKD-EPICys C (r = 0.552, p = 0.000). The present findings revealed that MDRD and CKD-EPICr equations are suitable for the calculation of eGFR in routine local clinical settings for the assessment of progression of kidney impairment in patients with CKD on hemodialysis treatment. However, the use of CKD-EPICr-Cys C rather than the CKD-EPICys C is recommended as a confirmatory tool where necessary.","PeriodicalId":9894,"journal":{"name":"Ceylon Journal of Science","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceylon Journal of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/cjs.v52i4.8093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study was to compare eGFR values estimated from different equations based on creatinine and cystatin-C in patients on hemodialysis treatment. eGFR values were calculated using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology equations based on Creatinine (CKD-EPICr) and cystatin-C values alone (CKDEPI Cys C) and by their combination (CKD-EPICr-Cys C), using 40 pre-dialysis samples. No significant differences in renal function parameters and eGFR were observed, either between male (55%) and female (45%) patients or within different age groups (p>0.05). Certain levels of agreement (p>0.05) were observed between the equations, except for the values derived from CKD-EPICys C and CKD-EPICr-Cys C (p = 0.022). Significant positive correlations were observed between all selected equations. The highest correlation was observed between CKD-EPICr and MDRD (r = 0.998, p = 0.000), whereas the lowest correlation was found between MDRD and CKD-EPICys C (r = 0.552, p = 0.000). The present findings revealed that MDRD and CKD-EPICr equations are suitable for the calculation of eGFR in routine local clinical settings for the assessment of progression of kidney impairment in patients with CKD on hemodialysis treatment. However, the use of CKD-EPICr-Cys C rather than the CKD-EPICys C is recommended as a confirmatory tool where necessary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯里兰卡加勒卡拉皮提亚教学医院血液透析患者基于肌酐和胱抑素c的不同方程估计的eGFR值的相关性
本研究旨在比较血液透析治疗患者中基于肌酐和胱抑素c的不同方程估计的eGFR值。使用肾脏疾病饮食改变(MDRD)、基于肌酐(CKD-EPICr)和胱抑素-C值的慢性肾脏疾病流行病学方程(CKDEPI Cys C)和它们的组合(CKD-EPICr-Cys C)计算eGFR值,使用40个透析前样本。在男性(55%)和女性(45%)患者之间以及不同年龄组之间,肾功能参数和eGFR均无显著差异(p>0.05)。除了CKD-EPICys C和CKD-EPICr-Cys C得出的值(p = 0.022)外,两个方程之间存在一定程度的一致性(p>0.05)。所有选择的方程之间均观察到显著的正相关。CKD-EPICr与MDRD相关性最高(r = 0.998, p = 0.000),而MDRD与CKD-EPICys C相关性最低(r = 0.552, p = 0.000)。目前的研究结果表明,MDRD和CKD- epicr方程适用于计算eGFR,用于评估接受血液透析治疗的CKD患者肾脏损害的进展。然而,在必要时,推荐使用CKD-EPICr-Cys C而不是CKD-EPICys C作为确认工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
An in-vitro gastric digestion model with peristalsis function for the analysis of the food gastric digestion Physico-chemical, textural and consumers’ acceptability of biscuits made from composite flour of wheat, fermented soybean-hull and date-pulp Incidence, Characterization and Pathogenicity of Seed-Borne Fungi of Lentil (Lens culinaris L.) in Pakistan Optimization of chemical treatments on the mechanical properties of banana leaves Urea cocrystals: the fertilizer industry’s next big thing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1