Do (gendered) ageism and ethnic minorities explain workplace bullying?

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR International Journal of Manpower Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1108/ijm-10-2022-0492
Krista Jaakson, Mariya Dedova
{"title":"Do (gendered) ageism and ethnic minorities explain workplace bullying?","authors":"Krista Jaakson, Mariya Dedova","doi":"10.1108/ijm-10-2022-0492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to answer two research questions: first, to what extent can workplace bullying be explained by ageism? And second, does the likelihood of workplace bullying increase when age interacts with gender and ethnic minority? Design/methodology/approach The authors report results from a survey carried out in 11 organizations in Estonia ( N = 1,614) using the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised (Einarsen et al. , 2009). Findings The results show that ageism does not explain bullying in Estonia. As in some earlier studies, older age correlates negatively with negative acts, and women report less work-related bullying than men. These findings were unexpected because Estonia's post-socialist background and the highest gender wage gap in Europe suggested otherwise. However, there is gendered ageism in work-related bullying such that older women report more negative acts in their workplace. Respondents from ethnic minority groups do not experience more bullying in general, nor in combination with age. Surprisingly, managers reported both person- and work-related bullying more than employees with no subordinates. Originality/value The study contributes to intersectionality literature with a view to workplace bullying in post-socialist study context.","PeriodicalId":47915,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Manpower","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Manpower","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-10-2022-0492","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to answer two research questions: first, to what extent can workplace bullying be explained by ageism? And second, does the likelihood of workplace bullying increase when age interacts with gender and ethnic minority? Design/methodology/approach The authors report results from a survey carried out in 11 organizations in Estonia ( N = 1,614) using the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised (Einarsen et al. , 2009). Findings The results show that ageism does not explain bullying in Estonia. As in some earlier studies, older age correlates negatively with negative acts, and women report less work-related bullying than men. These findings were unexpected because Estonia's post-socialist background and the highest gender wage gap in Europe suggested otherwise. However, there is gendered ageism in work-related bullying such that older women report more negative acts in their workplace. Respondents from ethnic minority groups do not experience more bullying in general, nor in combination with age. Surprisingly, managers reported both person- and work-related bullying more than employees with no subordinates. Originality/value The study contributes to intersectionality literature with a view to workplace bullying in post-socialist study context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(性别)年龄歧视和少数民族能解释职场欺凌吗?
本研究旨在回答两个研究问题:第一,职场欺凌在多大程度上可以用年龄歧视来解释?其次,当年龄与性别和少数民族相互作用时,职场欺凌的可能性是否会增加?设计/方法/方法作者报告了爱沙尼亚11个组织(N = 1,614)使用负面行为问卷-修订版(Einarsen et al., 2009)进行的调查结果。研究结果表明,年龄歧视不能解释爱沙尼亚的欺凌行为。正如一些早期的研究一样,年龄越大与负面行为呈负相关,女性报告的与工作有关的欺凌行为比男性少。这些发现出乎意料,因为爱沙尼亚的后社会主义背景和欧洲最大的性别工资差距表明情况并非如此。然而,在与工作有关的欺凌行为中存在性别年龄歧视,因此年长女性在工作场所报告的负面行为更多。来自少数民族群体的受访者总体上没有遭受更多的欺凌,也没有与年龄相结合。令人惊讶的是,与没有下属的员工相比,管理者报告的个人和工作相关的欺凌行为更多。原创性/价值本研究为后社会主义研究背景下的职场欺凌研究提供了交叉性文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
11.40%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ■Employee welfare ■Human aspects during the introduction of technology ■Human resource recruitment, retention and development ■National and international aspects of HR planning ■Objectives of human resource planning and forecasting requirements ■The working environment
期刊最新文献
Intersectional analysis of the labour market impacts of COVID on women with young children and in low-skilled jobs Intellectual capital as a driver of value creation in Serbian entrepreneurial firms Tax incentives for jobs: bang for the buck or wasted resources? Employment discrimination against transgender women in England Impact of green self-managed teams on firm’s performance: a moderating serial mediation model from an emerging market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1