Resilience of racialized segregation is an ecological factor: Baltimore case study

Q1 Engineering Buildings & cities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5334/bc.317
Steward T. A. Pickett, J. Morgan Grove, Christopher G. Boone, Geoffrey L. Buckley
{"title":"Resilience of racialized segregation is an ecological factor: Baltimore case study","authors":"Steward T. A. Pickett, J. Morgan Grove, Christopher G. Boone, Geoffrey L. Buckley","doi":"10.5334/bc.317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Segregation by racialized categories is common to cities across the world and its social effects are well studied. However, the environmental effects—the ecology of segregation—have received less attention. Racialized segregation persists through time and is associated with environmental hazards or lack of amenities. The environmental burdens of racial segregation are increasingly documented and this paper synthesizes the dynamics of segregation and the dynamics of ecological conditions associated with it. The ‘adaptive cycle of resilience,’ an important social–ecological theory, is applied and used to facilitate synthesis. The well-documented history of racial segregation in the US city of Baltimore, Maryland, is used to illustrate the systemic mechanisms that adapt segregation to changing social conditions, and hence maintain its ecological impacts. The adaptive cycle serves as a useful tool in evaluating and addressing the ecology of segregation and can thus advance urban ecology on a new horizon. Practice relevance The adaptive cycle of resilience demonstrates that persistent racial segregation in cities results from an intentional but flexible system that includes many seemingly banal practices. These include planning, zoning, patterns of investment, influence of the real estate industry, distribution of amenities and disamenities, and access to civic power and influence. The adaptive cycle shows that the persistence of segregation is not ‘natural’ or inevitable. Rather, segregation persists as a result of racialized policies and practices that exclude certain groups from civic goods and processes. Acknowledging that cycles of segregation have been, and are being, institutionally maintained identifies a system that may be disrupted by community action, policy adjustment, and planning practice.","PeriodicalId":93168,"journal":{"name":"Buildings & cities","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buildings & cities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Segregation by racialized categories is common to cities across the world and its social effects are well studied. However, the environmental effects—the ecology of segregation—have received less attention. Racialized segregation persists through time and is associated with environmental hazards or lack of amenities. The environmental burdens of racial segregation are increasingly documented and this paper synthesizes the dynamics of segregation and the dynamics of ecological conditions associated with it. The ‘adaptive cycle of resilience,’ an important social–ecological theory, is applied and used to facilitate synthesis. The well-documented history of racial segregation in the US city of Baltimore, Maryland, is used to illustrate the systemic mechanisms that adapt segregation to changing social conditions, and hence maintain its ecological impacts. The adaptive cycle serves as a useful tool in evaluating and addressing the ecology of segregation and can thus advance urban ecology on a new horizon. Practice relevance The adaptive cycle of resilience demonstrates that persistent racial segregation in cities results from an intentional but flexible system that includes many seemingly banal practices. These include planning, zoning, patterns of investment, influence of the real estate industry, distribution of amenities and disamenities, and access to civic power and influence. The adaptive cycle shows that the persistence of segregation is not ‘natural’ or inevitable. Rather, segregation persists as a result of racialized policies and practices that exclude certain groups from civic goods and processes. Acknowledging that cycles of segregation have been, and are being, institutionally maintained identifies a system that may be disrupted by community action, policy adjustment, and planning practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种族隔离的恢复力是一个生态因素:巴尔的摩案例研究
种族分类的隔离在世界各地的城市都很常见,其社会影响也得到了很好的研究。然而,隔离生态的环境效应却很少受到重视。种族隔离随着时间的推移而持续存在,并与环境危害或缺乏便利设施有关。种族隔离的环境负担越来越多地被记录下来,本文综合了种族隔离的动态和与之相关的生态条件的动态。弹性的适应周期;一个重要的社会生态学理论,被应用并用于促进综合。本文以美国马里兰州巴尔的摩市的种族隔离历史为例,阐述了使种族隔离适应不断变化的社会条件,从而保持其生态影响的系统机制。适应性循环是评估和解决隔离生态的有用工具,因此可以将城市生态推向一个新的水平。弹性的适应循环表明,城市中持续的种族隔离是由一个有意识但灵活的系统造成的,其中包括许多看似平庸的做法。这些因素包括规划、分区、投资模式、房地产行业的影响、便利和不便利的分布,以及公民权力和影响力的获取。适应性循环表明,隔离的持续存在并不是“自然的”。还是不可避免的。相反,种族隔离的持续存在是种族化的政策和做法的结果,这些政策和做法将某些群体排除在公民福利和进程之外。承认隔离的循环过去和现在都是制度上维持的,可以确定一个可能被社区行动、政策调整和规划实践所破坏的系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Social values and social infrastructures: a multi-perspective approach to place Non-domestic building stock: linking dynamics and spatial distributions Assessing the social values of historic shopping arcades: building biographies The feeling of comfort in residential settings I: a qualitative model Policy tensions in demolition: Dutch social housing and circularity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1