Hematological scoring system and its correlation with blood culture, C-reactive protein, and micro-erythrocyte sedimentation rate in early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis

MohammadJaseem Hassan, Nawal Amir, Murad Ahmad, Kafil Akhtar
{"title":"Hematological scoring system and its correlation with blood culture, C-reactive protein, and micro-erythrocyte sedimentation rate in early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis","authors":"MohammadJaseem Hassan, Nawal Amir, Murad Ahmad, Kafil Akhtar","doi":"10.4103/joah.joah_39_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Neonatal sepsis is a major health problem in our country. The cause for most of the deaths is not a failure to treat the infection, instead, it is the failure to treat it on time. Sepsis is usually identified by a gold-standard blood culture test. However, there is a need for a simple and cost-effective diagnostic tool with quick results.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 70 neonates with clinical suspicion of sepsis were included in our study. The hematological parameters such as total leukocyte count(TLC), absolute neutrophil count (ANC), platelet count, immature neutrophil count, immature to total neutrophil ratio (I:T), immature to mature neutrophil ratio (I:M), toxic granules, and cytoplasmic vacuolation in neutrophil were correlated with C-reactive protein (CRP), blood culture and micro-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (micro-ESR). The performance of these hematological parameters was evaluated with the help of hematological scoring system (HSS).RESULTS: Among the hematological parameters, TLC has high sensitivity (77.8%) and specificity (72.1%), ANC has the least sensitivity (44.4%) but the highest specificity (96.7%), platelet count has high sensitivity (88.9%) but low specificity (44.3%), I:T and I:M ratio have the highest sensitivity (88.9% both), specificity (71.1% and 88.5%, respectively) and negative predictive value (91.3% and 92.8% respectively). ANC and I:M ratios have the highest positive predictive value (89.3% and 82.5%, respectively) in predicting the early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.CONCLUSION: HSS along with CRP and micro-ESR can be used as a screening tool in neonates with clinical suspicion of sepsis as they are simple to perform, and can be done even in rural parts of the country.","PeriodicalId":36501,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Hematology","volume":"283 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joah.joah_39_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neonatal sepsis is a major health problem in our country. The cause for most of the deaths is not a failure to treat the infection, instead, it is the failure to treat it on time. Sepsis is usually identified by a gold-standard blood culture test. However, there is a need for a simple and cost-effective diagnostic tool with quick results.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 70 neonates with clinical suspicion of sepsis were included in our study. The hematological parameters such as total leukocyte count(TLC), absolute neutrophil count (ANC), platelet count, immature neutrophil count, immature to total neutrophil ratio (I:T), immature to mature neutrophil ratio (I:M), toxic granules, and cytoplasmic vacuolation in neutrophil were correlated with C-reactive protein (CRP), blood culture and micro-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (micro-ESR). The performance of these hematological parameters was evaluated with the help of hematological scoring system (HSS).RESULTS: Among the hematological parameters, TLC has high sensitivity (77.8%) and specificity (72.1%), ANC has the least sensitivity (44.4%) but the highest specificity (96.7%), platelet count has high sensitivity (88.9%) but low specificity (44.3%), I:T and I:M ratio have the highest sensitivity (88.9% both), specificity (71.1% and 88.5%, respectively) and negative predictive value (91.3% and 92.8% respectively). ANC and I:M ratios have the highest positive predictive value (89.3% and 82.5%, respectively) in predicting the early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.CONCLUSION: HSS along with CRP and micro-ESR can be used as a screening tool in neonates with clinical suspicion of sepsis as they are simple to perform, and can be done even in rural parts of the country.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血液学评分系统及其与血培养、c反应蛋白、微红细胞沉降率的相关性在新生儿败血症早期诊断中的意义
背景:新生儿脓毒症是我国的一个主要健康问题。大多数死亡的原因不是没有治疗感染,而是没有及时治疗。脓毒症通常通过金标准血培养试验来确定。然而,需要一种简单、经济、快速的诊断工具。材料与方法:本研究共纳入70例临床怀疑为脓毒症的新生儿。血液学参数如总白细胞计数(TLC)、绝对中性粒细胞计数(ANC)、血小板计数、未成熟中性粒细胞计数、未成熟与总中性粒细胞比值(I:T)、未成熟与成熟中性粒细胞比值(I:M)、毒性颗粒、中性粒细胞胞浆空泡化与c反应蛋白(CRP)、血培养和微红细胞沉降率(micro-ESR)相关。采用血液学评分系统(HSS)对各血液学指标进行评价。结果:血液学参数中,TLC具有较高的敏感性(77.8%)和特异性(72.1%),ANC敏感性最低(44.4%)但特异性最高(96.7%),血小板计数具有较高的敏感性(88.9%)但特异性较低(44.3%),I:T和I:M比值具有最高的敏感性(均为88.9%),特异性分别为71.1%和88.5%,阴性预测值分别为91.3%和92.8%。ANC和I:M比值在预测新生儿脓毒症早期诊断方面具有最高的阳性预测值(分别为89.3%和82.5%)。结论:HSS联合CRP和micro-ESR操作简单,可作为临床怀疑有脓毒症的新生儿的筛查工具,即使在农村地区也可应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Hematology
Journal of Applied Hematology Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hydroxymethylbilane Synthase Gene Mutation: The Hidden Driver of Abdominal Pain and Neurological Symptoms in Acute Intermittent Porphyria Reticulocyte Hemoglobin Content: Advancing the Frontiers in Iron-deficiency Anemia Diagnosis and Management Plasmablastic lymphoma in Epstein–Barr virus-negative patient Plasmablastic lymphoma in Epstein–Barr virus-negative patient Do we need local guidelines for the diagnosis and management of immune thrombocytopenia in Iraq?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1