On heartbreak, livelihoods and art: affect and crip desire in art making assemblages

Kimberlee Collins, Chelsea Temple Jones, Carla Rice
{"title":"On heartbreak, livelihoods and art: affect and crip desire in art making assemblages","authors":"Kimberlee Collins, Chelsea Temple Jones, Carla Rice","doi":"10.1080/1600910x.2023.2250926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis article explores the affective dimensions of disabled, D/deaf, mad, and neurodiverse artists’ work through a livelihoods framework informed by the social and tacit dimensions of heartbreak. Heartbreak emerged during interviews with twenty artists in Canada in 2020, during a time of significant state-based policy changes that impacted disabled people’s livelihoods in the province of Ontario. Taken together, the artists’ stories form a rhizomatic cartography that takes crip wisdom and desire as significant elements of artmaking amid wider relational assemblages of affect. Drawing on Deleuzian and Guattarian concepts of desire and Puar’s difference-in/as-assemblage, researchers assert that although crip artmaking is not without joy, heartbreak is embedded in the politically aesthetic work of cultural production.KEYWORDS: Disabilitycrip artsdesireassemblagesaffectheartbreakrhizomatic cartography Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 We wish to thank a reviewer for their suggestion that we open the interpretation to include cripping health conventions.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.Notes on contributorsKimberlee CollinsKimberlee Collins is a PhD candidate at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto. Her research emerges at the intersections of critical disability studies, climate justice and posthumanism to explore emotional responses to climate change and environmental degradation.Chelsea Temple JonesChelsea Temple Jones is an Associate Professor of Child and Youth Studies at Brock University. Dr. Jones' qualitative research focuses on disabled children's childhood studies and takes intellectual disability as a cultural phenomenon.Carla RiceCarla Rice is Professor and Tier I Canada Research Chair in Feminist Studies and Social Practice in the College of Social and Applied Human Sciences at the University of Guelph, Canada. She is founder of the Re•Vision Centre for Art and Social Justice and Principal Investigator of Bodies in Translation: Activist Art, Technology and Access to Life.","PeriodicalId":42670,"journal":{"name":"Distinktion-Journal of Social Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Distinktion-Journal of Social Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910x.2023.2250926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis article explores the affective dimensions of disabled, D/deaf, mad, and neurodiverse artists’ work through a livelihoods framework informed by the social and tacit dimensions of heartbreak. Heartbreak emerged during interviews with twenty artists in Canada in 2020, during a time of significant state-based policy changes that impacted disabled people’s livelihoods in the province of Ontario. Taken together, the artists’ stories form a rhizomatic cartography that takes crip wisdom and desire as significant elements of artmaking amid wider relational assemblages of affect. Drawing on Deleuzian and Guattarian concepts of desire and Puar’s difference-in/as-assemblage, researchers assert that although crip artmaking is not without joy, heartbreak is embedded in the politically aesthetic work of cultural production.KEYWORDS: Disabilitycrip artsdesireassemblagesaffectheartbreakrhizomatic cartography Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 We wish to thank a reviewer for their suggestion that we open the interpretation to include cripping health conventions.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.Notes on contributorsKimberlee CollinsKimberlee Collins is a PhD candidate at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto. Her research emerges at the intersections of critical disability studies, climate justice and posthumanism to explore emotional responses to climate change and environmental degradation.Chelsea Temple JonesChelsea Temple Jones is an Associate Professor of Child and Youth Studies at Brock University. Dr. Jones' qualitative research focuses on disabled children's childhood studies and takes intellectual disability as a cultural phenomenon.Carla RiceCarla Rice is Professor and Tier I Canada Research Chair in Feminist Studies and Social Practice in the College of Social and Applied Human Sciences at the University of Guelph, Canada. She is founder of the Re•Vision Centre for Art and Social Justice and Principal Investigator of Bodies in Translation: Activist Art, Technology and Access to Life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论心碎、生计与艺术:艺术创作组合中的情感与欲望
摘要本文通过心碎的社会和隐性维度为基础的生计框架,探讨了残疾人、聋人、疯子和神经多样性艺术家作品的情感维度。2020年,在加拿大对20位艺术家的采访中,心碎出现了,当时安大略省的国家政策发生了重大变化,影响了残疾人的生计。这些艺术家的故事合在一起,形成了一幅根茎状的地图,在更广泛的情感关系组合中,将拙劣的智慧和欲望作为艺术创作的重要元素。研究人员借鉴德勒兹和瓜达尔关于欲望的概念,以及普瓦尔的“作为组合的差异”(difference in/as- assembly),断言尽管蹩脚的艺术创作并非没有快乐,但心碎却嵌入了文化生产的政治美学作品中。关键词:残障,残肢艺术,期望重组,影响心碎,根茎制图披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。注1:我们要感谢一位审稿人的建议,他建议我们在解释中增加有关卫生公约的内容。本研究得到了加拿大社会科学与人文研究理事会的支持。作者简介:skimberlee Collins,多伦多大学达拉拉纳公共卫生学院博士研究生。她的研究出现在关键的残疾研究,气候正义和后人文主义的交叉点,探索对气候变化和环境退化的情感反应。切尔西·邓波儿·琼斯切尔西·邓波儿·琼斯是布鲁克大学儿童与青年研究的副教授。Jones博士的定性研究侧重于残疾儿童的童年研究,将智障作为一种文化现象。卡拉·赖斯(Carla Rice),加拿大圭尔夫大学社会与应用人文科学学院教授,女性主义研究与社会实践加拿大一级研究主席。她是Re•视觉艺术与社会正义中心的创始人,也是《翻译中的身体:激进主义艺术、技术和生活途径》的首席研究员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Special issue: the elements of theorizing The end (and persistence) of subjectivity: Lukács with Adorno, Adorno with Lukács Totality and incoherence: for a shared project of novel theory and black studies Thinking hegemony otherwise – an educational critique of Mouffe’s agonism (Re)search results: search engines and the logic of efficiency in scholarship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1