Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Receiving a Second Rescue Valve During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Structural Heart Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.shj.2023.100231
Henrik Bjursten MD, PhD , Sasha Koul MD, PhD , Pétur Pétursson MD, PhD , Jacob Odenstedt MD, PhD , Henrik Hagström MD , Jenny Backes MD , Niels Erik Nielsen MD, PhD , Andreas Rück MD, PhD , Jan Johansson MD , Stefan James MD, PhD , Magnus Settergren MD, PhD , Matthias Götberg MD, PhD , Troels Yndigen MD
{"title":"Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Receiving a Second Rescue Valve During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation","authors":"Henrik Bjursten MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sasha Koul MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Pétur Pétursson MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jacob Odenstedt MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Henrik Hagström MD ,&nbsp;Jenny Backes MD ,&nbsp;Niels Erik Nielsen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Andreas Rück MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jan Johansson MD ,&nbsp;Stefan James MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Magnus Settergren MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Matthias Götberg MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Troels Yndigen MD","doi":"10.1016/j.shj.2023.100231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a safe procedure. However, complications occur, including uncommon complications such as valve malposition, which requires the implantation of an additional rescue valve (rescue-AV). The aim was to study the occurrence and outcomes of rescue-AV in a nationwide registry.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Swedish national TAVI registry was used as the primary data source, where all 6706 TAVI procedures from 2016 to 2021 were retrieved. Nontransfemoral access and planned valve-in-valve were excluded. In total, 79 patients were identified as having had a rescue-AV, and additional detailed data were collected for these patients. This dataset was analyzed for any characteristics that could predispose patients to a rescue-AV. The outcome of patients receiving rescue-AV also was studied.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 5948 patients in the study, 1.3% had a rescue-AV. There were few differences between patients receiving 1 valve and rescue-AV patients. For patients receiving a rescue-AV, the 30-day mortality was 15.2% compared to 1.6% in the control group. A poor outcome after rescue-AV was often associated with a second complication; for example, stroke, need for emergency surgery, or heart failure. Among the patients with rescue-AV who survived at least 30 days, landmark analyses showed similar survival rates compared to the control group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Among TAVI patients in a nationwide register, rescue-AV occurred in 1.3% of patients. The 30-day mortality in patients receiving rescue-AV was high, but long-term outcome among 30-day survivors was similar to the control group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36053,"journal":{"name":"Structural Heart","volume":"8 2","pages":"Article 100231"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2474870623001252/pdfft?md5=d8e7317bcc2e227b6226a3cbf035db7d&pid=1-s2.0-S2474870623001252-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2474870623001252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a safe procedure. However, complications occur, including uncommon complications such as valve malposition, which requires the implantation of an additional rescue valve (rescue-AV). The aim was to study the occurrence and outcomes of rescue-AV in a nationwide registry.

Methods

The Swedish national TAVI registry was used as the primary data source, where all 6706 TAVI procedures from 2016 to 2021 were retrieved. Nontransfemoral access and planned valve-in-valve were excluded. In total, 79 patients were identified as having had a rescue-AV, and additional detailed data were collected for these patients. This dataset was analyzed for any characteristics that could predispose patients to a rescue-AV. The outcome of patients receiving rescue-AV also was studied.

Results

Of the 5948 patients in the study, 1.3% had a rescue-AV. There were few differences between patients receiving 1 valve and rescue-AV patients. For patients receiving a rescue-AV, the 30-day mortality was 15.2% compared to 1.6% in the control group. A poor outcome after rescue-AV was often associated with a second complication; for example, stroke, need for emergency surgery, or heart failure. Among the patients with rescue-AV who survived at least 30 days, landmark analyses showed similar survival rates compared to the control group.

Conclusions

Among TAVI patients in a nationwide register, rescue-AV occurred in 1.3% of patients. The 30-day mortality in patients receiving rescue-AV was high, but long-term outcome among 30-day survivors was similar to the control group.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在经导管主动脉瓣植入术中接受第二个救援瓣膜的患者的特征和预后
背景导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)已成为一种安全的手术。然而,并发症也时有发生,包括瓣膜错位等不常见的并发症,这就需要植入额外的救援瓣膜(救援瓣膜)。瑞典国家 TAVI 登记处作为主要数据来源,检索了 2016 年至 2021 年的 6706 例 TAVI 手术。非经股动脉入路和计划中的瓣内瓣膜被排除在外。总共有 79 名患者被确定为进行了抢救性瓣膜置换术,并收集了这些患者的其他详细数据。我们对该数据集进行了分析,以找出可能导致患者接受抢救性 AV 的任何特征。结果 在研究的 5948 名患者中,有 1.3% 的患者接受了抢救性 AV。接受单瓣手术的患者与接受抢救性单瓣手术的患者之间几乎没有差异。接受抢救性 AV 的患者 30 天死亡率为 15.2%,而对照组为 1.6%。抢救性人工瓣膜术后的不良预后往往与第二种并发症有关,例如中风、需要紧急手术或心力衰竭。在至少存活 30 天的抢救-AV 患者中,地标分析显示其存活率与对照组相似。接受抢救-AV的患者30天死亡率较高,但30天存活患者的长期预后与对照组相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Structural Heart
Structural Heart Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
期刊最新文献
Moderate Aortic Stenosis—Advanced Imaging, Risk Assessment, and Treatment Strategies The Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement-Conduction Study: The Value of the His-Ventricular Interval in Risk Stratification for Post-TAVR Atrioventricular-Block Large Field-of-View Intravascular Ultrasound for Mitral and Tricuspid Valve-in-Valve Guidance: A Pilot Study Quantitative Aortography Analysis of JenaValve’s Trilogy Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation System in Patients With Aortic Regurgitation or Stenosis A Novel Risk Score Facilitates Femoral Artery Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Passage-Puncture Score
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1