Understanding coordination in humanitarian action: insights from the activities–resources–actors model

Laetitia Tosi, Justine Marty
{"title":"Understanding coordination in humanitarian action: insights from the activities–resources–actors model","authors":"Laetitia Tosi, Justine Marty","doi":"10.1108/ijdi-04-2023-0101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to propose an analytical tool based on the activities–resources–actors (ARA) model to understand the coordination mechanisms in humanitarian action. The tool identifies the phases of humanitarian action and analyzes the underlying mechanisms that facilitate coordination among organizations. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a literature review to develop analytical grids and theoretical propositions based on the ARA model. Findings The ARA model is a useful tool for understanding coordination mechanisms in humanitarian action. The study identifies key elements of interaction systems and characterizes the phases of humanitarian action. Effective coordination among organizations is essential for successful aid delivery. The study provides four theoretical propositions. Research limitations/implications Future research could validate the propositions formulated in this study through case studies. Practical implications The analytical grids proposed in this study can be used by humanitarian organizations to improve their coordination mechanisms and aid delivery processes. Social implications Effective humanitarian action can help alleviate the suffering of individuals affected by crises and contribute to the overall well-being of communities. The analytical tool proposed in this study can improve the effectiveness of humanitarian action and ultimately benefit society. Originality/value This paper presents an original approach by leveraging the ARA model to develop an analytical tool for humanitarian action, which is useful for both practitioners and researchers. In addition, the paper attempts to overcome the siloed vision of humanitarian action by highlighting “emergency-development” aspect.","PeriodicalId":37830,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Development Issues","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Development Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijdi-04-2023-0101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to propose an analytical tool based on the activities–resources–actors (ARA) model to understand the coordination mechanisms in humanitarian action. The tool identifies the phases of humanitarian action and analyzes the underlying mechanisms that facilitate coordination among organizations. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a literature review to develop analytical grids and theoretical propositions based on the ARA model. Findings The ARA model is a useful tool for understanding coordination mechanisms in humanitarian action. The study identifies key elements of interaction systems and characterizes the phases of humanitarian action. Effective coordination among organizations is essential for successful aid delivery. The study provides four theoretical propositions. Research limitations/implications Future research could validate the propositions formulated in this study through case studies. Practical implications The analytical grids proposed in this study can be used by humanitarian organizations to improve their coordination mechanisms and aid delivery processes. Social implications Effective humanitarian action can help alleviate the suffering of individuals affected by crises and contribute to the overall well-being of communities. The analytical tool proposed in this study can improve the effectiveness of humanitarian action and ultimately benefit society. Originality/value This paper presents an original approach by leveraging the ARA model to develop an analytical tool for humanitarian action, which is useful for both practitioners and researchers. In addition, the paper attempts to overcome the siloed vision of humanitarian action by highlighting “emergency-development” aspect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解人道主义行动中的协调:来自活动-资源-行动者模式的见解
本研究旨在提出一种基于活动-资源-行动者(ARA)模型的分析工具来理解人道主义行动中的协调机制。该工具确定了人道主义行动的各个阶段,并分析了促进各组织之间协调的基本机制。设计/方法/方法本研究通过文献综述,在ARA模型的基础上建立分析网格和理论命题。ARA模型是理解人道主义行动协调机制的有用工具。这项研究确定了相互作用系统的关键要素,并描述了人道主义行动的各个阶段。各组织之间的有效协调对于成功提供援助至关重要。本研究提供了四个理论命题。未来的研究可以通过案例研究来验证本研究中提出的命题。本研究提出的分析网格可被人道主义组织用于改善其协调机制和援助交付过程。有效的人道主义行动可以帮助减轻受危机影响的个人的痛苦,促进社区的全面福祉。本研究提出的分析工具可以提高人道主义行动的有效性,最终造福社会。本文提出了一种利用ARA模型开发人道主义行动分析工具的原创方法,这对实践者和研究人员都很有用。此外,该文件还试图通过强调"紧急发展"方面来克服人道主义行动的孤立观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Development Issues
International Journal of Development Issues Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Development Issues (IJDI) publishes scholarly research on important development issues, with a particular focus on development dynamism and a leaning towards inter-disciplinary research. IJDI welcomes papers that are empirically oriented but such work should have solid methodological foundations based on realism and pragmatism rather than on idealism. Critical analysis of development issues from both the heteredox viewpoint and the neo-liberalist viewpoint, in orthodox tradition, are equally encouraged. The journal publishes authoritative, intelligent articles and research of direct relevance to those investigating and/or working within areas closely associated with development processes. Special consideration is given to research papers that consider development issues from either a socio-economic, political, historical or sociological, anthropological, ecological and technological standpoint.
期刊最新文献
Accurate targeting in social assistance programs in Southern Madagascar Impact of government expenditure on unemployment in Asian countries: does institutional quality matter? Estimating vulnerability to income and multidimensional poverty: a new methodological approach Natural resource rent's effect on Ethiopian inequality and manufacturing's moderating role: evidence from dynamic simulated ARDL model Trade, gender equality and institutional quality: Evidence from the gravitational approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1