Racial Disparities in Family Income, Assets, and Liabilities: A Century After the 1921 Tulsa Massacre

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Family and Economic Issues Pub Date : 2023-11-04 DOI:10.1007/s10834-023-09938-4
William A. Darity, Raffi E. García, Lauren Russell, Jorge N. Zumaeta
{"title":"Racial Disparities in Family Income, Assets, and Liabilities: A Century After the 1921 Tulsa Massacre","authors":"William A. Darity, Raffi E. García, Lauren Russell, Jorge N. Zumaeta","doi":"10.1007/s10834-023-09938-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper examines the financial health of racial-ethnic groups in Tulsa, Oklahoma, nearly a century after the 1921 Tulsa Massacre. We use data from the Tulsa National Asset Scorecard for Communities of Color (NASCC) survey to assess the financial health of two demographic groups that were historically the victims of racial violence - Native Americans and Black Americans. Specifically, we investigate financial outcomes a century after these groups made significant economic gains during the Tulsa oil boom in the early 1900 s and were subsequently victimized by racial violence. We find that Black households have statistically significantly less wealth and income than Whites in Tulsa. Our decomposition analysis shows household demographic differences between Blacks and Whites largely do not explain these wealth and income gaps, suggestive of historical discrimination. While in the case of the Native American tribes and Whites, the findings generally show no statistical significance. Compared to other NASCC-surveyed cities that did not experience destruction to the level of the Tulsa Massacre, the Black-White wealth and income gaps and the unexplained portion of the decompositions are the largest in Tulsa. Our results provisionally suggest that past exposure to racial violence can have long-term effects on the economic outcomes of the affected groups decades later.","PeriodicalId":39675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","volume":"23 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-023-09938-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the financial health of racial-ethnic groups in Tulsa, Oklahoma, nearly a century after the 1921 Tulsa Massacre. We use data from the Tulsa National Asset Scorecard for Communities of Color (NASCC) survey to assess the financial health of two demographic groups that were historically the victims of racial violence - Native Americans and Black Americans. Specifically, we investigate financial outcomes a century after these groups made significant economic gains during the Tulsa oil boom in the early 1900 s and were subsequently victimized by racial violence. We find that Black households have statistically significantly less wealth and income than Whites in Tulsa. Our decomposition analysis shows household demographic differences between Blacks and Whites largely do not explain these wealth and income gaps, suggestive of historical discrimination. While in the case of the Native American tribes and Whites, the findings generally show no statistical significance. Compared to other NASCC-surveyed cities that did not experience destruction to the level of the Tulsa Massacre, the Black-White wealth and income gaps and the unexplained portion of the decompositions are the largest in Tulsa. Our results provisionally suggest that past exposure to racial violence can have long-term effects on the economic outcomes of the affected groups decades later.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭收入、资产和负债中的种族差异:1921年塔尔萨大屠杀后的一个世纪
摘要:本文考察了1921年塔尔萨大屠杀发生近一个世纪后,俄克拉荷马州塔尔萨市各种族群体的财务状况。我们使用塔尔萨有色人种社区国家资产记分卡(NASCC)调查的数据来评估两个历史上曾遭受种族暴力的人口群体——美国原住民和美国黑人的财务健康状况。具体来说,我们调查了这些群体在20世纪初塔尔萨石油繁荣时期取得重大经济收益后一个世纪的财务结果,随后成为种族暴力的受害者。我们发现,在塔尔萨,黑人家庭的财富和收入在统计上明显低于白人。我们的分解分析显示,黑人和白人之间的家庭人口统计差异在很大程度上不能解释这些财富和收入差距,这暗示了历史上的歧视。而在美洲土著部落和白人的情况下,研究结果通常没有统计学意义。与nascc调查的其他没有经历像塔尔萨大屠杀那样严重破坏的城市相比,黑人和白人的财富和收入差距以及无法解释的分解部分在塔尔萨是最大的。我们的研究结果暂时表明,过去遭受的种族暴力会对受影响群体几十年后的经济结果产生长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Family and Economic Issues
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Journal of Family and Economic Issues is an interdisciplinary publication that explores the intricate relationship between the family and its economic environment. Peer-reviewed contributions address important issues in family management, household labor and productivity, relationships between economic and non-economic issues including health and healthcare, as well as interrelations between external settings and family life, including family policy, work, and community. The journal features the following types of submissions: original research, critical reviews, brief communications, invited letters to the editor, and reviews of significant books on the field.
期刊最新文献
Gendered Relationship of Childbearing with Earnings Accumulated by Midlife in Two Nordic Welfare States German Parents Attaining Intrapersonal Work-Family Balance While Implementing the 50/50-Split-Model with Their Partners Hide and Seek with Finances: Financial Infidelity and Financial Snooping in Relationships Status Seeking and Work-Family Conflicts: How the Pursuit of Wealth and Success Threatens Family Peace in 26 Countries The Will to Sustain Through Shocks, Wars and Crises: How the History of a Country Influences the Behaviour of the Family CEO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1