Students’ perceptions and experiences of remote learning amid covid-19 pandemic in Ghana

Pub Date : 2023-11-04 DOI:10.1142/s1013702524500070
Rockson Kumi, Jonathan Quartey, Samuel Koranteng Kwakye, Emmanuella Dufie Oppong
{"title":"Students’ perceptions and experiences of remote learning amid covid-19 pandemic in Ghana","authors":"Rockson Kumi, Jonathan Quartey, Samuel Koranteng Kwakye, Emmanuella Dufie Oppong","doi":"10.1142/s1013702524500070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on students, instructors, and educational organisations all around the world. Remote learning was an emergency response by most universities in Ghana during this pandemic to ensure the continuation of their academic calendar. Conducting this study among Ghanaian undergraduate students is crucial because factors like socioeconomic status, technological resources, and individual learning preferences can significantly impact their experience and the perception of remote learning, which may differ from studies conducted elsewhere. Objective: To determine the perceptions and experiences of remote learning among allied health sciences students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 218 second, third, and final year Allied Health Sciences students in the University of Ghana. A questionnaire was used to obtain data concerning health professions students’ perception and experience of remote learning. The readiness of students in respect to the emergency remote learning, attitudes towards remote learning, perception of remote learning, satisfaction, and the level of anxiety was calculated using mean and mean percentages. Kruskal–Wallis test was used to analyse differences between programmes of study and the perceptions and experiences of remote learning. Results: One hundred and fifteen (53.1%) of the participants had moderate perceptions of independence and responsibility in their learning experiences while 80 (36.7%) students reported that their satisfaction levels regarding remote learning was high. Seventy-seven (38.4%) students reported that they had a burden of anxiety. There was no statistically significant difference between anxiety level and programme of study. Conclusion: Ghana Allied Health Sciences students had positive perceptions and experiences towards remote learning. They could adapt to the new teaching method with appropriate technology integration. Despite a number of students who were anxious about using remote learning. Adequate support towards transitioning into the use of technology may be a good consideration.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1013702524500070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on students, instructors, and educational organisations all around the world. Remote learning was an emergency response by most universities in Ghana during this pandemic to ensure the continuation of their academic calendar. Conducting this study among Ghanaian undergraduate students is crucial because factors like socioeconomic status, technological resources, and individual learning preferences can significantly impact their experience and the perception of remote learning, which may differ from studies conducted elsewhere. Objective: To determine the perceptions and experiences of remote learning among allied health sciences students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 218 second, third, and final year Allied Health Sciences students in the University of Ghana. A questionnaire was used to obtain data concerning health professions students’ perception and experience of remote learning. The readiness of students in respect to the emergency remote learning, attitudes towards remote learning, perception of remote learning, satisfaction, and the level of anxiety was calculated using mean and mean percentages. Kruskal–Wallis test was used to analyse differences between programmes of study and the perceptions and experiences of remote learning. Results: One hundred and fifteen (53.1%) of the participants had moderate perceptions of independence and responsibility in their learning experiences while 80 (36.7%) students reported that their satisfaction levels regarding remote learning was high. Seventy-seven (38.4%) students reported that they had a burden of anxiety. There was no statistically significant difference between anxiety level and programme of study. Conclusion: Ghana Allied Health Sciences students had positive perceptions and experiences towards remote learning. They could adapt to the new teaching method with appropriate technology integration. Despite a number of students who were anxious about using remote learning. Adequate support towards transitioning into the use of technology may be a good consideration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
covid-19大流行期间加纳学生对远程学习的看法和经验
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行对世界各地的学生、教师和教育机构产生了重大影响。远程学习是加纳大多数大学在本次大流行期间采取的紧急应对措施,以确保其学历得以延续。在加纳本科生中进行这项研究至关重要,因为社会经济地位、技术资源和个人学习偏好等因素会显著影响他们的体验和对远程学习的看法,这可能与其他地方进行的研究不同。目的:了解2019冠状病毒病疫情期间卫生专业学生远程学习的认知和体验。方法:这项横断面研究涉及218名加纳大学联合健康科学专业二年级、三年级和最后一年级的学生。采用问卷调查法了解卫生专业学生对远程学习的感知和体验情况。学生对紧急远程学习的准备程度、对远程学习的态度、对远程学习的感知、满意度和焦虑水平采用平均百分比和平均百分比进行计算。Kruskal-Wallis测试用于分析学习计划与远程学习的感知和体验之间的差异。结果:115名(53.1%)学生在学习过程中具有中等程度的独立性和责任感,80名(36.7%)学生对远程学习的满意度较高。77名(38.4%)学生报告有焦虑负担。焦虑水平和学习计划之间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:加纳联合健康科学专业学生对远程学习有积极的认知和体验。通过适当的技术整合,他们能够适应新的教学方法。尽管许多学生对使用远程学习感到焦虑。适当地支持过渡到使用技术可能是一个很好的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1