Between strong and weak copyright: their impacts on the Korean music industry

IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q2 CULTURAL STUDIES International Journal of Cultural Policy Pub Date : 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1080/10286632.2023.2268105
Jimmyn Parc
{"title":"Between strong and weak copyright: their impacts on the Korean music industry","authors":"Jimmyn Parc","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2023.2268105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTA common perception is that a strong copyright regime protects cultural diversity and creativity; thus, it should be well developed, implemented, and respected. However, this belief may be different for certain industries or countries. In other words, strong copyright may not bring about a positive impact as expected whereas weak copyright can bring about positive impacts contrary to one’s expectations, which is different from the conventional belief on copyright. This paper explores this issue with the Korea music industry. Although this industry has recently enjoyed global popularity with K-pop, it was lesser-developed as it endured many difficulties over several decades. By comparing and analyzing these two contrasting periods, the case of the Korean music industry demonstrates that both weak and strong copyright has helped with its development. This interesting case can provide meaningful implications regarding the practice and development of copyright and its impact on the growth of the music industry, particularly in the era of digitization.KEYWORDS: K-popKorean music industrycopyrightweak copyrightdigitization AcknowledgmentsThe author of this article would like to express his gratitude to Ute Röschenthaler (Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz) and Alexander Peukert (Goethe University Frankfurt) for their constructive comments and efforts to open a wonderful workshop on copyright, where this paper was presented.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1. Article 1, Chapter I of the law states as follows: This law aims to protect the authors of scholarly or artistic works, with the purpose of promoting the advancement of national [Korean] culture.2. Article 46, Chapter II of the law states as follows: With regard to the copyright of foreigners, except for provisions in treaties, the provisions of this law apply. However, in cases where there are no treaty provisions regarding copyright protection, the protection under this law shall be granted to the first publisher of the work within the country.3. Neighboring rights, also known as related rights or rights neighboring to copyright, were created for those who are not technically authors such as performing artists, producers of phonograms, and those involved in radio and television broadcasting. The scope can be different by country.4. See the section ‘Crucial changes in the history of Korea’s copyright law.’Additional informationFundingThis study was supported by the University of Malaya [IF057-2021], and it was financially supported in part by the Institute of Communication Research, Seoul National University.Notes on contributorsJimmyn ParcJimmyn Parc is an associate professor at the Department of East Asian Studies, University of Malaya, Malaysia and a researcher at the Institute of Communication Research, Seoul National University, Korea.","PeriodicalId":51520,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","volume":"194 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2023.2268105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTA common perception is that a strong copyright regime protects cultural diversity and creativity; thus, it should be well developed, implemented, and respected. However, this belief may be different for certain industries or countries. In other words, strong copyright may not bring about a positive impact as expected whereas weak copyright can bring about positive impacts contrary to one’s expectations, which is different from the conventional belief on copyright. This paper explores this issue with the Korea music industry. Although this industry has recently enjoyed global popularity with K-pop, it was lesser-developed as it endured many difficulties over several decades. By comparing and analyzing these two contrasting periods, the case of the Korean music industry demonstrates that both weak and strong copyright has helped with its development. This interesting case can provide meaningful implications regarding the practice and development of copyright and its impact on the growth of the music industry, particularly in the era of digitization.KEYWORDS: K-popKorean music industrycopyrightweak copyrightdigitization AcknowledgmentsThe author of this article would like to express his gratitude to Ute Röschenthaler (Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz) and Alexander Peukert (Goethe University Frankfurt) for their constructive comments and efforts to open a wonderful workshop on copyright, where this paper was presented.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1. Article 1, Chapter I of the law states as follows: This law aims to protect the authors of scholarly or artistic works, with the purpose of promoting the advancement of national [Korean] culture.2. Article 46, Chapter II of the law states as follows: With regard to the copyright of foreigners, except for provisions in treaties, the provisions of this law apply. However, in cases where there are no treaty provisions regarding copyright protection, the protection under this law shall be granted to the first publisher of the work within the country.3. Neighboring rights, also known as related rights or rights neighboring to copyright, were created for those who are not technically authors such as performing artists, producers of phonograms, and those involved in radio and television broadcasting. The scope can be different by country.4. See the section ‘Crucial changes in the history of Korea’s copyright law.’Additional informationFundingThis study was supported by the University of Malaya [IF057-2021], and it was financially supported in part by the Institute of Communication Research, Seoul National University.Notes on contributorsJimmyn ParcJimmyn Parc is an associate professor at the Department of East Asian Studies, University of Malaya, Malaysia and a researcher at the Institute of Communication Research, Seoul National University, Korea.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
版权的强弱:对韩国音乐产业的影响
摘要:人们普遍认为,强有力的版权制度可以保护文化多样性和创造力;因此,它应该得到很好的发展、实施和尊重。然而,对于某些行业或国家来说,这种信念可能有所不同。换句话说,强版权可能不会带来预期的积极影响,而弱版权可能会带来与预期相反的积极影响,这与传统的版权观念不同。本文以韩国音乐产业为例,探讨了这一问题。虽然这个行业最近因K-pop而受到全球欢迎,但由于几十年来经历了许多困难,它的发展程度较低。通过对这两个截然不同的时期的比较和分析,韩国音乐产业的案例表明,无论是弱版权还是强版权都有助于其发展。这个有趣的案例可以为版权的实践和发展及其对音乐产业增长的影响提供有意义的启示,特别是在数字化时代。本文作者在此感谢Ute Röschenthaler(美因茨约翰内斯·古腾堡大学)和Alexander Peukert(法兰克福歌德大学)的建设性意见和努力,他们为本文举办了一个精彩的版权研讨会。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。该法第一章第1条规定:本法旨在保护学术或艺术作品的作者,以促进民族文化的进步。著作权法第二章第46条规定:外国人的著作权,除条约另有规定外,适用本法规定。但是,在条约没有关于版权保护的规定的情况下,本法的保护适用于该作品在国内的第一个出版者。邻接权,也被称为相关权或与版权相邻的权利,是为那些在技术上不是作者的人创造的,如表演艺术家、录音制品制作者以及参与广播和电视广播的人。范围因国家而异。请参阅“韩国版权法历史上的重大变化”一节。本研究得到了马来亚大学[IF057-2021]的支持,首尔国立大学传播研究所也提供了部分资金支持。作者简介jimmyn Parc,马来西亚马来亚大学东亚研究系副教授,韩国首尔国立大学传播研究所研究员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
The road to censorship: the case of digital audiovisual industries in India Inverse relationships between cultural sustainability and human rights: the counterintuitive cases of Nigerian Avu Udu dance and white-power music Rethinking ‘collective effervescence,’ post-COVID-19: what Japanese punks can teach us about crowd control Entrepreneurship at the edge? The characteristics and role of creative entrepreneurs in peripheral regions Creative and cultural hub sustainability: from theory to practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1