The Impact of Applying Scientific Learning with Conventional Learning on Creativity and Physical Education Learning Outcomes of High School Students

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.46328/ijemst.3832
Mesnan Mesnan, Nimrot Manalu, Amir Supriadi
{"title":"The Impact of Applying Scientific Learning with Conventional Learning on Creativity and Physical Education Learning Outcomes of High School Students","authors":"Mesnan Mesnan, Nimrot Manalu, Amir Supriadi","doi":"10.46328/ijemst.3832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to see the influence of scientific and conventional learning on the creativity and learning outcomes of physical education students in high school. This experimental research uses test instrument techniques for learning outcomes and questionnaires for creativity, with a 2x2 factorial ANOVA research design. The number of samples was 50 people for the scientific learning group and 40 for the conventional learning group, and the sampling technique used cluster random sampling. Before carrying out an analysis of variance (ANOVA), first carry out the analysis requirements, namely the normality test and homogeneity test. Next, the two-way ANOVA test was used at a significance level of α of 0.05 and continued with the Scheffe test at a significance level of α = 0.05. The research results show that 1). There are differences in the influence of conventional and scientific learning on creativity; 2). There are differences in the effect of conventional learning and scientific learning on physical education learning outcomes; 3). There are differences in the influence of conventional and scientific learning on creativity and physical education learning outcomes; 4). There is an interaction between the influence of conventional learning and scientific learning on creativity and physical education learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":44518,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to see the influence of scientific and conventional learning on the creativity and learning outcomes of physical education students in high school. This experimental research uses test instrument techniques for learning outcomes and questionnaires for creativity, with a 2x2 factorial ANOVA research design. The number of samples was 50 people for the scientific learning group and 40 for the conventional learning group, and the sampling technique used cluster random sampling. Before carrying out an analysis of variance (ANOVA), first carry out the analysis requirements, namely the normality test and homogeneity test. Next, the two-way ANOVA test was used at a significance level of α of 0.05 and continued with the Scheffe test at a significance level of α = 0.05. The research results show that 1). There are differences in the influence of conventional and scientific learning on creativity; 2). There are differences in the effect of conventional learning and scientific learning on physical education learning outcomes; 3). There are differences in the influence of conventional and scientific learning on creativity and physical education learning outcomes; 4). There is an interaction between the influence of conventional learning and scientific learning on creativity and physical education learning outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学学习与传统学习相结合对高中生创造力和体育学习成果的影响
本研究旨在了解科学学习和传统学习对高中体育学生创造力和学习成果的影响。本实验研究采用学习成果测试仪器技术和创造力问卷,采用2x2因子方差分析研究设计。科学学习组为50人,传统学习组为40人,抽样方法采用整群随机抽样。在进行方差分析(ANOVA)之前,首先要进行分析要求,即正态性检验和齐性检验。其次,在显著性水平为α = 0.05的情况下,采用双因素方差分析检验,在显著性水平为α = 0.05的情况下继续采用Scheffe检验。研究结果表明:1)传统学习与科学学习对创造力的影响存在差异;2)常规学习与科学学习对体育学习成果的影响存在差异;3)传统学习与科学学习对创造力和体育学习成果的影响存在差异;(4)传统学习和科学学习对创造力和体育学习成果的影响存在交互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
23.10%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
The Degree of Special Education Teachers’ Employment of Electronic Educational Games in Teaching Disabled Students Focus on the Assessment Concerns of In-service and Pre-service Mathematics Teachers Stereotypes and Views of Science among Elementary Students: Gender and Grade Differences Systematic Review: Trends in Intelligent Tutoring Systems in Mathematics Teaching and Learning Computational Thinking Research in Mathematics Learning in the Last Decade: A Bibliometric Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1