Description of patient characteristics and medication adherence among medication access mobile application users and nonusers: a single-center questionnaire-based cross-sectional study

Ghadah Assiri, Dalal Alabdulkarim, Asrar Alanazi, Sarah Altamimi, Nadin Lafi Alanazi, Wael Khawagi
{"title":"Description of patient characteristics and medication adherence among medication access mobile application users and nonusers: a single-center questionnaire-based cross-sectional study","authors":"Ghadah Assiri, Dalal Alabdulkarim, Asrar Alanazi, Sarah Altamimi, Nadin Lafi Alanazi, Wael Khawagi","doi":"10.1186/s44247-023-00039-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background In this study, we aimed to describe patient characteristics and medication adherence among medication access mobile application users and nonusers. Methods This was a cross-sectional study of a randomly selected sample of patients who refilled their medications either through the mobile application ‘MNG-HA Care’ or by phone call to a government-funded multispecialty hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected through an online survey and filed either via WhatsApp or by phone call. Medication adherence was assessed using the five-item Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5). Results A total of 280 respondents were recruited, and their mean age was 48.8 years (standard deviation (SD): 17.8). More than 75% of application users and nonusers were younger (18–64 years) and lived in urban areas, 58% were male, 37.5% held a bachelor’s degree, and 40% were unemployed. The number of respondents who accessed the mobile application (mobile application users) was 212, and 64.2% of them were adherent to their medications. Sixty-eight of the respondents used a phone call for refills (mobile application nonusers), and 77.9% of them were adherent to their medications. The most common self-reported reasons for using the application were to book an appointment and to request a medication refill. The most common self-reported reasons for not using the application were respondents’ lack of knowledge about the availability of the application and preference for speaking directly to the health care provider. Adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that medication adherence was not associated with application use (Odds Ratio (OR): 0.65; 95% CI: 0.33–1.29). However, male patients had significantly higher adherence than females (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.31 to 5.51), and employed patients had significantly lower adherence than unemployed patients (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.81). Conclusions Providing patients with access to their medication list through a mobile application alone did not significantly impact medication adherence. Further research is needed to explore the potential benefits of incorporating additional features, such as medication instructions and reminders within mobile applications, to improve medication adherence.","PeriodicalId":72426,"journal":{"name":"BMC digital health","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44247-023-00039-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background In this study, we aimed to describe patient characteristics and medication adherence among medication access mobile application users and nonusers. Methods This was a cross-sectional study of a randomly selected sample of patients who refilled their medications either through the mobile application ‘MNG-HA Care’ or by phone call to a government-funded multispecialty hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected through an online survey and filed either via WhatsApp or by phone call. Medication adherence was assessed using the five-item Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5). Results A total of 280 respondents were recruited, and their mean age was 48.8 years (standard deviation (SD): 17.8). More than 75% of application users and nonusers were younger (18–64 years) and lived in urban areas, 58% were male, 37.5% held a bachelor’s degree, and 40% were unemployed. The number of respondents who accessed the mobile application (mobile application users) was 212, and 64.2% of them were adherent to their medications. Sixty-eight of the respondents used a phone call for refills (mobile application nonusers), and 77.9% of them were adherent to their medications. The most common self-reported reasons for using the application were to book an appointment and to request a medication refill. The most common self-reported reasons for not using the application were respondents’ lack of knowledge about the availability of the application and preference for speaking directly to the health care provider. Adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that medication adherence was not associated with application use (Odds Ratio (OR): 0.65; 95% CI: 0.33–1.29). However, male patients had significantly higher adherence than females (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.31 to 5.51), and employed patients had significantly lower adherence than unemployed patients (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.81). Conclusions Providing patients with access to their medication list through a mobile application alone did not significantly impact medication adherence. Further research is needed to explore the potential benefits of incorporating additional features, such as medication instructions and reminders within mobile applications, to improve medication adherence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在药物访问移动应用程序用户和非用户中描述患者特征和药物依从性:一项基于单中心问卷的横断面研究
摘要背景在本研究中,我们旨在描述药物获取移动应用程序用户和非用户的患者特征和药物依从性。这是一项横断面研究,随机选择患者样本,通过移动应用程序“MNG-HA Care”或通过电话向沙特阿拉伯利雅得政府资助的多专科医院补充药物。数据通过在线调查收集,并通过WhatsApp或电话提交。用药依从性采用5项用药依从性报告量表(MARS-5)进行评估。结果共纳入调查对象280人,平均年龄48.8岁(标准差:17.8)。超过75%的应用程序用户和非用户是年轻人(18-64岁),居住在城市地区,58%是男性,37.5%拥有学士学位,40%失业。访问移动应用程序(移动应用程序用户)的受访者人数为212人,其中64.2%的人坚持服药。68名受访者使用电话补药(不使用移动应用程序),77.9%的人坚持服药。使用该应用程序的最常见的自我报告原因是预约和请求药物补充。自我报告的不使用该应用程序的最常见原因是受访者对该应用程序的可用性缺乏了解,并且倾向于直接与卫生保健提供者交谈。调整后的多因素logistic回归分析显示,药物依从性与应用程序使用无关(优势比(OR): 0.65;95% ci: 0.33-1.29)。然而,男性患者的依从性明显高于女性(OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.31至5.51),就职患者的依从性明显低于未就职患者(OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17至0.81)。结论仅通过移动应用程序向患者提供药物清单对药物依从性没有显著影响。需要进一步的研究来探索在移动应用程序中加入额外功能的潜在好处,例如药物说明和提醒,以提高药物依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Potential sources of inaccuracy in the Apple watch series 4 energy expenditure estimation algorithm during wheelchair propulsion From an idea to the marketplace: identifying and addressing ethical and regulatory considerations across the digital health product-development lifecycle Efficacy of digital interventions on physical activity promotion in individuals with noncommunicable diseases: an overview of systematic reviews Software symptomcheckR: an R package for analyzing and visualizing symptom checker triage performance Introduction and content analysis of "Nurse's voice" WhatsApp group during COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1