The role of the dispute about the nature of content- figurae in structural semantics in semiotics’ history: Hjelmslev, Jakobson, and Eco

Q2 Arts and Humanities Acta Linguistica Hafniensia Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/03740463.2023.2241281
Andrea Picciuolo Aresta
{"title":"The role of the dispute about the nature of content- <i>figurae</i> in structural semantics in semiotics’ history: Hjelmslev, Jakobson, and Eco","authors":"Andrea Picciuolo Aresta","doi":"10.1080/03740463.2023.2241281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The debate on the semantic analysis of both lexical and grammatical forms has been salient since the early days of the institutionalisation of semiotics, as fundamental to the theoretical and methodological curriculum of this disciplinary domain. In this debate, the concept of content-figurae, or semantic traits, plays a major role. The well-established sources for this concept and the corresponding method of analysis are the works of Hjelmslev and Jakobson, mediated through Umberto Eco’s thinking. In Eco’s framework, the idea of content-figurae is interpreted as that of ‘semantic primitives, and on that ground, its epistemological foundation and methodological efficacy are refuted. In this article, I try to relate Eco’s semiotic position to Hjelmslev’s and Jakobsons’s positions in linguistic (grammatical) semantics, discussing their principles of semantic analysis of grammatical forms from the perspective of the institutionalisation of semiotics as a disciplinary domain.","PeriodicalId":35105,"journal":{"name":"Acta Linguistica Hafniensia","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Linguistica Hafniensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2023.2241281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The debate on the semantic analysis of both lexical and grammatical forms has been salient since the early days of the institutionalisation of semiotics, as fundamental to the theoretical and methodological curriculum of this disciplinary domain. In this debate, the concept of content-figurae, or semantic traits, plays a major role. The well-established sources for this concept and the corresponding method of analysis are the works of Hjelmslev and Jakobson, mediated through Umberto Eco’s thinking. In Eco’s framework, the idea of content-figurae is interpreted as that of ‘semantic primitives, and on that ground, its epistemological foundation and methodological efficacy are refuted. In this article, I try to relate Eco’s semiotic position to Hjelmslev’s and Jakobsons’s positions in linguistic (grammatical) semantics, discussing their principles of semantic analysis of grammatical forms from the perspective of the institutionalisation of semiotics as a disciplinary domain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结构语义学中关于内容-形象本质的争论在符号学历史中的作用:海姆斯列夫、雅各布森和艾柯
自符号学制度化的早期以来,关于词汇和语法形式的语义分析的争论一直很突出,这是该学科领域理论和方法论课程的基础。在这场争论中,内容-形象或语义特征的概念起着重要作用。这一概念和相应的分析方法的成熟来源是Hjelmslev和Jakobson的作品,通过翁贝托·艾柯的思想进行中介。在艾柯的框架中,物象的概念被解释为“语义原语”的概念,在此基础上,其认识论基础和方法论功效被驳斥。在本文中,我试图将艾柯的符号学立场与耶尔姆斯列夫和雅各布森在语言(语法)语义学上的立场联系起来,从符号学作为一个学科领域的制度化的角度讨论他们对语法形式的语义分析原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Boundary-crossing situations and the use of deictic verbs in Finnish and Estonian expressions of non-actual motion Are discourse-initial action-guiding verbless speech acts elliptical? Bulletin du Cercle linguistique de Copenhague 2023 The use of case forms in Modern Danish – an empirical study Schematicity vs. lexicality: typological differences between Danish and Spanish
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1