Systematic Review: Analysis of Coding Vulnerabilities across Languages

Shreyas Sakharkar
{"title":"Systematic Review: Analysis of Coding Vulnerabilities across Languages","authors":"Shreyas Sakharkar","doi":"10.4236/jis.2023.144019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The boom of coding languages in the 1950s revolutionized how our digital world was construed and accessed. The languages invented then, including Fortran, are still in use today due to their versatility and ability to underpin a large majority of the older portions of our digital world and applications. Fortran, or Formula Translation, was a programming language implemented by IBM that shortened the apparatus of coding and the efficacy of the language syntax. Fortran marked the beginning of a new era of efficient programming by reducing the number of statements needed to operate a machine several-fold. Since then, dozens more languages have come into regular practice and have been increasingly diversified over the years. Some modern languages include Python, Java, JavaScript, C, C++, and PHP. These languages significantly improved efficiency and also have a broad range of uses. Python is mainly used for website/software development, data analysis, task automation, image processing, and graphic design applications. On the other hand, Java is primarily used as a client-side programming language. Expanding the coding languages allowed for increasing accessibility but also opened up applications to pertinent security issues. These security issues have varied by prevalence and language. Previous research has narrowed its focus on individual languages, failing to evaluate the security. This research paper investigates the severity and frequency of coding vulnerabilities comparatively across different languages and contextualizes their uses in a systematic literature review.","PeriodicalId":57259,"journal":{"name":"信息安全(英文)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"信息安全(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jis.2023.144019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The boom of coding languages in the 1950s revolutionized how our digital world was construed and accessed. The languages invented then, including Fortran, are still in use today due to their versatility and ability to underpin a large majority of the older portions of our digital world and applications. Fortran, or Formula Translation, was a programming language implemented by IBM that shortened the apparatus of coding and the efficacy of the language syntax. Fortran marked the beginning of a new era of efficient programming by reducing the number of statements needed to operate a machine several-fold. Since then, dozens more languages have come into regular practice and have been increasingly diversified over the years. Some modern languages include Python, Java, JavaScript, C, C++, and PHP. These languages significantly improved efficiency and also have a broad range of uses. Python is mainly used for website/software development, data analysis, task automation, image processing, and graphic design applications. On the other hand, Java is primarily used as a client-side programming language. Expanding the coding languages allowed for increasing accessibility but also opened up applications to pertinent security issues. These security issues have varied by prevalence and language. Previous research has narrowed its focus on individual languages, failing to evaluate the security. This research paper investigates the severity and frequency of coding vulnerabilities comparatively across different languages and contextualizes their uses in a systematic literature review.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统回顾:跨语言编码漏洞分析
20世纪50年代编码语言的繁荣彻底改变了我们对数字世界的理解和访问方式。当时发明的语言,包括Fortran,至今仍在使用,因为它们的多功能性和支撑我们数字世界和应用程序的大部分旧部分的能力。Fortran,即公式翻译,是一种由IBM实现的编程语言,它缩短了编码设备和语言语法的有效性。Fortran将操作机器所需的语句数量减少了几倍,标志着高效编程新时代的开始。从那时起,数十种语言进入了常规实践,并且多年来越来越多样化。一些现代语言包括Python、Java、JavaScript、C、c++和PHP。这些语言显著地提高了效率,并且具有广泛的用途。Python主要用于网站/软件开发、数据分析、任务自动化、图像处理和平面设计应用程序。另一方面,Java主要用作客户端编程语言。扩展编码语言可以增加可访问性,但也使应用程序面临相关的安全问题。这些安全问题因流行程度和语言而异。之前的研究只关注单个语言,没有对安全性进行评估。本文对不同语言中编码漏洞的严重程度和频率进行了比较研究,并对其使用进行了系统的文献综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
211
期刊最新文献
Secure Web Application Technologies Implementation through Hardening Security Headers Using Automated Threat Modelling Techniques Research and Practice on High Availability Scheme of Unified Identity Authentication System Based on CAS in Colleges and Universities Learning with Errors Public Key Cryptosystem with Its Security User Station Security Protection Method Based on Random Domain Name Detection and Active Defense Towards a New Model for the Production of Civil Status Records Using Blockchain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1