Navigating asymmetry in the Indian Ocean region: Oman in the US-India-China strategic triangle

IF 0.9 Q2 AREA STUDIES Journal of the Indian Ocean Region Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/19480881.2023.2261203
Mohammed Al-Hajri, Jonathan Fulton
{"title":"Navigating asymmetry in the Indian Ocean region: Oman in the US-India-China strategic triangle","authors":"Mohammed Al-Hajri, Jonathan Fulton","doi":"10.1080/19480881.2023.2261203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis paper analyzes the options available to small states in the Indian Ocean region (IOR) in an era of great power competition, using the case of Oman’s engagement with the strategic triangle of the United States, India, and China. Motivated primarily by concerns at the domestic and regional levels, Omani decision makers perceive good relations with each of the three powers to be important in addressing their most pressing concerns and have therefore avoided balancing or bandwagoning behavior. Instead, Oman has followed an omni-enmeshment approach whereby it uses these extra-regional relationships as a means of supporting their preferences for regional order while at the same time addressing domestic pressures.KEYWORDS: OmanOmni-enmeshmentIndo-PacificStrategic triangle Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The GCC consists of Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.Additional informationNotes on contributorsMohammed Al-HajriMohammed Al-Hajri is a PhD candidate at the Department of Politics, Birkbeck, University of London. His research interests include Arab-Asia studies, with a particular focus on Sino-GCC relations, the foreign policy of smaller Gulf states, International Political Economy, and port infrastructure politics. The PhD thesis discusses the dynamics of China-GCC relations and the impact of Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) on port infrastructure in the GCC region.Jonathan FultonJonathan Fulton is an associate professor of political science at Zayed University in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.","PeriodicalId":53974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Ocean Region","volume":"156 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Ocean Region","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19480881.2023.2261203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis paper analyzes the options available to small states in the Indian Ocean region (IOR) in an era of great power competition, using the case of Oman’s engagement with the strategic triangle of the United States, India, and China. Motivated primarily by concerns at the domestic and regional levels, Omani decision makers perceive good relations with each of the three powers to be important in addressing their most pressing concerns and have therefore avoided balancing or bandwagoning behavior. Instead, Oman has followed an omni-enmeshment approach whereby it uses these extra-regional relationships as a means of supporting their preferences for regional order while at the same time addressing domestic pressures.KEYWORDS: OmanOmni-enmeshmentIndo-PacificStrategic triangle Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The GCC consists of Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.Additional informationNotes on contributorsMohammed Al-HajriMohammed Al-Hajri is a PhD candidate at the Department of Politics, Birkbeck, University of London. His research interests include Arab-Asia studies, with a particular focus on Sino-GCC relations, the foreign policy of smaller Gulf states, International Political Economy, and port infrastructure politics. The PhD thesis discusses the dynamics of China-GCC relations and the impact of Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) on port infrastructure in the GCC region.Jonathan FultonJonathan Fulton is an associate professor of political science at Zayed University in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度洋地区的不对称导航:美印中战略三角中的阿曼
摘要本文以阿曼与美国、印度和中国的战略三角关系为例,分析了大国竞争时代印度洋地区小国的选择。出于对国内和区域两级关切的考虑,阿曼决策者认为与这三个大国的良好关系对于解决其最紧迫的关切非常重要,因此避免采取平衡或从众的行为。相反,阿曼采取了一种全面介入的做法,利用这些区域外关系作为支持其对区域秩序偏好的手段,同时解决国内压力。关键词:阿曼-中东-印度-太平洋战略三角披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。注1海湾合作委员会由巴林、科威特、阿曼、卡塔尔、沙特阿拉伯和阿拉伯联合酋长国组成。本文作者mohammed Al-Hajri是伦敦大学伯克贝克学院政治系的博士候选人。他的研究兴趣包括阿拉伯-亚洲研究,尤其关注中国与海湾合作委员会的关系、海湾小国的外交政策、国际政治经济学和港口基础设施政治。博士论文讨论了中国与海湾合作委员会关系的动态以及“一带一路”倡议对海湾合作委员会地区港口基础设施的影响。乔纳森·富尔顿(Jonathan Fulton)是阿拉伯联合酋长国阿布扎比扎耶德大学政治学副教授。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Legal implications of emerging technologies in maritime pollution monitoring and management Mapping maritime security in the Indian Ocean: changing contours and increasing complexities Searching for relevance: the evolving role of the Navy in India's military strategy The superpowers’ playground: Djibouti and geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific in the twenty first century India’s security imagination of the Bay of Bengal: aspiration, sub-optimality, and history
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1