Faculties of the Soul and Descartes’s Rejection of Substantial Forms

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5840/acpq2023974286
Adam Wood
{"title":"Faculties of the Soul and Descartes’s Rejection of Substantial Forms","authors":"Adam Wood","doi":"10.5840/acpq2023974286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a 1642 letter to Regius, Descartes elaborates several reasons for rejecting Aristotelian substantial forms including that (1) they are explanatorily impotent, (2) they are explanatorily unnecessary, and (3) they threaten the incorporeality and immortality of the human soul. Various ideas have already been proposed as to why Descartes thought Aristotelian substantial forms are susceptible to these criticisms. Here I suggest one further such idea, centered on the ways Descartes and medieval scholastics thought substantial forms—and souls in particular—are related to their powers.","PeriodicalId":44497,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq2023974286","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a 1642 letter to Regius, Descartes elaborates several reasons for rejecting Aristotelian substantial forms including that (1) they are explanatorily impotent, (2) they are explanatorily unnecessary, and (3) they threaten the incorporeality and immortality of the human soul. Various ideas have already been proposed as to why Descartes thought Aristotelian substantial forms are susceptible to these criticisms. Here I suggest one further such idea, centered on the ways Descartes and medieval scholastics thought substantial forms—and souls in particular—are related to their powers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灵魂的官能与笛卡儿对实体形式的否定
在1642年给雷吉斯的一封信中,笛卡尔阐述了几个拒绝亚里士多德实体形式的理由,包括:(1)它们在解释上是无能的,(2)它们在解释上是不必要的,(3)它们威胁到人类灵魂的非物质性和不朽性。关于为什么笛卡尔认为亚里士多德的实体形式容易受到这些批评,已经提出了各种各样的观点。在此,我进一步提出一个这样的观点,以笛卡尔和中世纪经院哲学家认为实体形式——尤其是灵魂——与它们的力量有关的方式为中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Atonement and the Death of Christ: An Exegetical, Historical, and Philosophical Exploration Warranted Catholic Belief in advance Newman the Fallibilist in advance A Transcategorial Conception of Dynamis and Energeia in advance A Correction to Dillard’s Reading of Geach’s Temporality Argument for Non-Materialism in advance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1