Risky Business: Ivan Durrant Versus the National Gallery of Victoria

Christopher R. Marshall
{"title":"Risky Business: Ivan Durrant Versus the National Gallery of Victoria","authors":"Christopher R. Marshall","doi":"10.1080/14434318.2023.2215830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size AcknowledgementsAn early version of the article was presented at the AAANZ 2022 Conference for the session ‘Museums and Risk’. I would like to thank the other participants for their contributions as well as the anonymous readers for their most helpful suggestions. Thanks are also due to David Hurlston and to Ivan Durrant for generously responding to my questions.Notes1 For the historical significance of the Modern Masters exhibition, see Understanding Museums: Australian Museums and Museology (2011), ed. Des Griffin and Leon Paroissien, National Museum of Australia, https://nma.gov.au/research/understanding-museums/Issues_museology_introduction.html; especially Daniel Thomas, ‘Art Museums in Australia: A Personal Account’, https://nma.gov.au/research/understanding-museums/DThomas_2011.html; and Caroline Turner, ‘International Exhibitions’, https://nma.gov.au/research/understanding-museums/CTurner_2011.html; Joanna Mendelssohn, Catherine de Lorenzo, Alison Inglis and Catherine Speck, Australian Art Exhibitions: Opening Our Eyes (Melbourne: Thames and Hudson, 2018), 95.2 ‘Notes for the Prime Minister for the opening of the exhibition, Modern Masters: Manet to Matisse at the Art Gallery of New South Wales, Sydney, 9 April 1975’, available at https://pmtranscripts.pmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/original/00003691.pdf3 For the Australian Government’s role in indemnifying international loan exhibitions, see Jim Berryman, ‘Art and National Interest: The Diplomatic Origins of the “Blockbuster Exhibition” in Australia’, Journal of Australian Studies 37, no. 2 (2013): 163–66.4 For the Whitlam Government’s arts policy, see ibid., 163–64; and Mendelssohn et al., Australian Art Exhibitions, 46–52. For the 1973 acquisition of Jackson Pollock’s Blue Poles, see Lindsay Barrett, ‘The Work of Art in the Age of the Metropolitan Dailies’, in The Prime Minister’s Christmas Card: ‘Blue Poles’ and Cultural Politics in the Whitlam Era (Sydney: Power Publications, 2001), 13–44; and Terry Smith, ‘Putting Painting at Stake: Jackson Pollock’s Blue Poles’, in Jackson Pollock’s ‘Blue Poles’, ed. Anthony White, exhibition catalogue (Canberra: The National Gallery of Australia, 2002), 59–62.5 Maureen Gilchrist, ‘Great Day in Our History of Art’, The Age, Tuesday 27 May 1975; no author, ‘The Night the Modern Masters Came to Melbourne’, The Herald, May 27, 1975.6 Ibid.7 ‘And the Queue just goes on … and on … and on …’, The Herald, June 21, 1975.8 Greg McKenzie, ‘I’ll Kill the Cow on the Stage: Artist’, The Sun, May 25, 1975.9 ‘MONASH COW, TX 28/5/75, EX FILM NTV1639, 1.58’, ABC Research Archives; ‘Monash University Cancels Ivan Durrant Happening Planned for Alexander Theatre’, ABC Research Archives.10 A version of the footage is available online. The description reads: ‘Unedited version cow being slaughtered in paddock (actual shooting not included on ‘Current Affair’) cow being dumped on steps’. ‘Australia: Cow Killing an Angry Wave of Protest (1975)’, British Pathe, https://www.britishpathe.com/video/VLVA2GG9QNTKLPWC7HSJ0KE5O0BMR-AUSTRALIA-COW-KILLING-AN-ANGRY-WAVE-OF-PROTEST/query/durrant.11 The artist quoted in ‘$100 Fine for Dumping a Dead Cow’, The Age, July 24, 1975.12 ‘Dead-Cow “Art” at Gallery’, The Sun, Tuesday, May 27, 1975.13 National Gallery of Victoria, Council of Trustees, 3 June 1975, Director’s Report, V(b) ‘Dropping of Dead Cow in front of Gallery’, Shaw Research Library, NGV.14 Magistrates’ Court, Melbourne. ‘Information for an offence punishable summarily and summons thereon’, 9 June 1975, artist’s collection.15 For Ivan Durrant’s severed hand happening of June 1975, see Ivan Durrant: Barrier Draw, exhibition catalogue, by David Hurlston with Rodney James and Barry Dickins, National Gallery of Victoria: Australia, May 1–October 25, 2020 (Melbourne: NGV Publications, 2020), 24–25; 68–69.16 Eva Dodd, ‘Art News’, Toorak Times, June 10, 1975.17 ‘$100 Fine for Dumping a Dead Cow’.18 Neil Howe, Parallel Realities: The Development of Performance Art in Australia (London: Thames and Hudson, 2017), 275–76.19 Graeme Sturgeon, ‘Private Ritual in Public, The Australian, August 2, 1975.20 Jeffrey Makin, ‘Intensive Care Art: It’s Sick’, The Sun, June 30, 1975.21 For this event and its ensuing controversy, see Ken Scarlett, Australian Sculptors (Melbourne: Thomas Nelson, 1980), 167–69; Charles Green, Peripheral Vision: Contemporary Australian Art 1970–1994 (Melbourne: Craftsman House, 1995), 12–13; Katherine Louise Gregory, ‘The Artist and the Museum: Contested Histories and Expanded Narratives in Australian Art and Museology 1975–2002’ (PhD diss., University of Melbourne, 2004), 18–24; and Mendelssohn et al., Australian Art Exhibitions, 78–80.22 Thursday 21 August 1975–‘Protest National Gallery of Victoria’, Shaw Research Library, NGV.23 For Mortensen’s 1975 Delicatessen installation and performance, see Anne Marsh, Body and Self: Performance Art in Australia, 1969–92 (Melbourne: Australian Video Art Archive (AVAA), Monash University, 1993), 8, as well as 23–24, 35 for commentary on the Pinacotheca Gallery, Richmond, another important early setting for performance art during this period.24 Kaldor Public Art Projects, Project 03: Gilbert & George, https://archive.kaldorartprojects.org.au/index.php/Detail/objects/26. For discussion, see Sophie Forbat, ed., Kaldor Public Art Projects, exhibition catalogue (Sydney: John Kaldor, Art Gallery of New South Wales, 2009), 86–99.25 Jennifer Phipps and Geoff Burke, eds., Performance, Documents, Film, Video, exhibition catalogue, National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne, August 28–September 28, 1975. For discussion, see Stephen Jones, ‘Video Art at the National Gallery of Victoria, 1973–78’, Art Journal 52 (2013), https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/essay/video-art-at-the-national-gallery-of-victoria-1973-78/; and Mendelssohn et al., Australian Art Exhibitions, 78–79.26 Daniel Thomas notes ‘its suggestion of protest against American cultural imperialism, and perhaps also of more diffuse anti-Americanism on account of the then recent Vietnam war quagmire’. Daniel Thomas, ‘Fleshly Moralities: Ivan Durrant in Melbourne’, Art Monthly Australia 172 (August 2004): 33.27 The artist also stressed that the dead cow happening had ‘nothing to do with Anti-Americanism’ in an interview with the author on 13 February 2023.28 The artist, quoted in Jill Bowen, ‘Ivan the Terrible: He’s at it Again’, Cleo, August 1976, 26.29 For the international context to institutional critique, see Blake Stimson, ‘What was Institutional Critique?’, in Alexander Alberro and Blake Stimson, eds., Institutional Critique: An Anthology of Artists’ Writings (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009), 20–42. For institutional critique in relation to more contemporary practices, see Janet Marstine, Critical Practice: Artists, Museums, Ethics (Routledge: London, 2017), 6–13.30 For discussion, see Green, Peripheral Vision, 31; Catherine Speck and Joanna Mendelssohn, ‘The 1970s: Curators Framing the Avant-Garde in Writing and Rewriting Art History’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Art 17, no. 1 (2017): 106.31 Alberro and Stimson, Institutional Critique, 8, 170–99. For Art & Language’s relationship with Australian art and criticism during this period, see Heather Barker and Charles Green, ‘The Provincialism Problem: Terry Smith and Centre-Periphery Art History’, Journal of Art Historiography 3 (2010): 3–17.32 Rodney James, ‘Blood Red: Ivan Durrant’s Social Conscience’, Ivan Durrant: Barrier Draw, 66–85.33 Geoff Robertson, ‘Cow Slaughter’, ABC News, May 26, 1975, ABC Research Archives.34 Zombies of the Stratosphere, directed by Fred C. Brannon, Los Angeles, CA: Republic Pictures, 1952, https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0045352/.35 ‘Protesters Arrested after Gluing Themselves to Picasso Painting at NGV in Melbourne’, ABC News, October 10, 2022, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-10-09/protesters-glue-themselves-to-picasso-painting-ngv-in-melbourne/101516560; ‘Extinction Rebellion Activists Glue onto Picasso Painting at the NGV’, Extinction Rebellion Australia, October 10, 2022, https://ausrebellion.earth/news/extinction-rebellion-activists-glue-on-to-picasso-painting-at-the-ngv/.36 ‘Alas Poor Daisy, I Knew Her Well’, The Age, May 27, 1975.37 Roy Grounds, Frederick Romberg and Robin Boyd, The National Art Gallery and Cultural Centre (Melbourne: J. Creffield Pty Ltd, 1960); for discussion see Christopher R. Marshall, ‘Between Beauty and Power: Henry Moore’s Draped Seated Woman as an Emblem of the National Gallery of Victoria’s Modernity, 1959–68’, Art Journal 46 (2006): 42–43, https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/essay/between-beauty-and-power-henry-moores-draped-seated-woman-as-an-emblem-of-the-national-gallery-of-victorias-modernity-1959-68/.38 A connection also noted in Philip Goad, ‘An Oriental Palazzo: Roy Grounds and the National Gallery of Victoria’, Backlogue 3 (1993): 76.39 Marshall, ‘Between Beauty and Power’, 36–49, 72–73.40 Christopher R. Marshall, ‘Monumental Sculpture and Institutional Identity at the National Gallery of Victoria: From Here to Eternity, and Back’, in Interesting Times: New Roles for Collections, Museums Australian National Conference Proceedings 2010 (Canberra: Museums Australia, 2011), 105–07, https://www.amaga.org.au/sites/default/files/uploaded-content/website-content/Conferences/2010/ma2010_conference_papers.pdf.41 Mary Eagle, ‘Hopping in for his Chop’, The Age, March 30, 1978.42 Paul Heinrichs, ‘A $6000 Stake in “Meat”’, The Age, May 31, 1978.43 Ivan Durrant: Barrier Draw, 72–76.44 Paul Heinrichs, ‘Art Tastes Meet the Market’, The Age, March 21, 1978.45 Ivan Durrant, interview with the author, February 13, 2023.46 Ivan Durrant: Barrier Draw, 25.47 Brian Blackwell, ‘Horror Art Movie Seen by Kids: Shock Scenes as igeons haHcked to Death’, The Truth, June 2, 1979.48 Bill Hitchings, ‘“Revenge” heory on Slashed Painting’, The Herald, June 18, 1979.49 Ibid.; Marsali MacKinnon, ‘Art Slashing to be Probed’, The Sun, June 19, 1979.50 Ibid.51 ‘Angry Artist Grieves’, The Age, October 3, 1979.52 ‘Artist Durrant Sues Gallery’, The Sun, October 4, 1979.53 Ivan Durrant, letter to Robert Lindsay, September 14, 1986, Ivan Durrant artist file, Shaw Research Library, NGV.54 Documentation for this proposal can be found in the artist’s file at the Shaw Research Library, NGV, for discussion of which, see Thomas, ‘Fleshly Moralities’, 34.55 Ivan Durrant: Barrier Draw, exhibition catalogue, by David Hurlston with Rodney James and Barry Dickins, National Gallery of Victoria: Australia, May 1–October 25, 2020 (Melbourne: NGV Publications, 2020).56 Durrant quoted in Bowen, ‘Ivan the Terrible’, 26. The quote was made in relation to Ivan Durrant’s severed hand happening of June 1975.","PeriodicalId":29864,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Art","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14434318.2023.2215830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size AcknowledgementsAn early version of the article was presented at the AAANZ 2022 Conference for the session ‘Museums and Risk’. I would like to thank the other participants for their contributions as well as the anonymous readers for their most helpful suggestions. Thanks are also due to David Hurlston and to Ivan Durrant for generously responding to my questions.Notes1 For the historical significance of the Modern Masters exhibition, see Understanding Museums: Australian Museums and Museology (2011), ed. Des Griffin and Leon Paroissien, National Museum of Australia, https://nma.gov.au/research/understanding-museums/Issues_museology_introduction.html; especially Daniel Thomas, ‘Art Museums in Australia: A Personal Account’, https://nma.gov.au/research/understanding-museums/DThomas_2011.html; and Caroline Turner, ‘International Exhibitions’, https://nma.gov.au/research/understanding-museums/CTurner_2011.html; Joanna Mendelssohn, Catherine de Lorenzo, Alison Inglis and Catherine Speck, Australian Art Exhibitions: Opening Our Eyes (Melbourne: Thames and Hudson, 2018), 95.2 ‘Notes for the Prime Minister for the opening of the exhibition, Modern Masters: Manet to Matisse at the Art Gallery of New South Wales, Sydney, 9 April 1975’, available at https://pmtranscripts.pmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/original/00003691.pdf3 For the Australian Government’s role in indemnifying international loan exhibitions, see Jim Berryman, ‘Art and National Interest: The Diplomatic Origins of the “Blockbuster Exhibition” in Australia’, Journal of Australian Studies 37, no. 2 (2013): 163–66.4 For the Whitlam Government’s arts policy, see ibid., 163–64; and Mendelssohn et al., Australian Art Exhibitions, 46–52. For the 1973 acquisition of Jackson Pollock’s Blue Poles, see Lindsay Barrett, ‘The Work of Art in the Age of the Metropolitan Dailies’, in The Prime Minister’s Christmas Card: ‘Blue Poles’ and Cultural Politics in the Whitlam Era (Sydney: Power Publications, 2001), 13–44; and Terry Smith, ‘Putting Painting at Stake: Jackson Pollock’s Blue Poles’, in Jackson Pollock’s ‘Blue Poles’, ed. Anthony White, exhibition catalogue (Canberra: The National Gallery of Australia, 2002), 59–62.5 Maureen Gilchrist, ‘Great Day in Our History of Art’, The Age, Tuesday 27 May 1975; no author, ‘The Night the Modern Masters Came to Melbourne’, The Herald, May 27, 1975.6 Ibid.7 ‘And the Queue just goes on … and on … and on …’, The Herald, June 21, 1975.8 Greg McKenzie, ‘I’ll Kill the Cow on the Stage: Artist’, The Sun, May 25, 1975.9 ‘MONASH COW, TX 28/5/75, EX FILM NTV1639, 1.58’, ABC Research Archives; ‘Monash University Cancels Ivan Durrant Happening Planned for Alexander Theatre’, ABC Research Archives.10 A version of the footage is available online. The description reads: ‘Unedited version cow being slaughtered in paddock (actual shooting not included on ‘Current Affair’) cow being dumped on steps’. ‘Australia: Cow Killing an Angry Wave of Protest (1975)’, British Pathe, https://www.britishpathe.com/video/VLVA2GG9QNTKLPWC7HSJ0KE5O0BMR-AUSTRALIA-COW-KILLING-AN-ANGRY-WAVE-OF-PROTEST/query/durrant.11 The artist quoted in ‘$100 Fine for Dumping a Dead Cow’, The Age, July 24, 1975.12 ‘Dead-Cow “Art” at Gallery’, The Sun, Tuesday, May 27, 1975.13 National Gallery of Victoria, Council of Trustees, 3 June 1975, Director’s Report, V(b) ‘Dropping of Dead Cow in front of Gallery’, Shaw Research Library, NGV.14 Magistrates’ Court, Melbourne. ‘Information for an offence punishable summarily and summons thereon’, 9 June 1975, artist’s collection.15 For Ivan Durrant’s severed hand happening of June 1975, see Ivan Durrant: Barrier Draw, exhibition catalogue, by David Hurlston with Rodney James and Barry Dickins, National Gallery of Victoria: Australia, May 1–October 25, 2020 (Melbourne: NGV Publications, 2020), 24–25; 68–69.16 Eva Dodd, ‘Art News’, Toorak Times, June 10, 1975.17 ‘$100 Fine for Dumping a Dead Cow’.18 Neil Howe, Parallel Realities: The Development of Performance Art in Australia (London: Thames and Hudson, 2017), 275–76.19 Graeme Sturgeon, ‘Private Ritual in Public, The Australian, August 2, 1975.20 Jeffrey Makin, ‘Intensive Care Art: It’s Sick’, The Sun, June 30, 1975.21 For this event and its ensuing controversy, see Ken Scarlett, Australian Sculptors (Melbourne: Thomas Nelson, 1980), 167–69; Charles Green, Peripheral Vision: Contemporary Australian Art 1970–1994 (Melbourne: Craftsman House, 1995), 12–13; Katherine Louise Gregory, ‘The Artist and the Museum: Contested Histories and Expanded Narratives in Australian Art and Museology 1975–2002’ (PhD diss., University of Melbourne, 2004), 18–24; and Mendelssohn et al., Australian Art Exhibitions, 78–80.22 Thursday 21 August 1975–‘Protest National Gallery of Victoria’, Shaw Research Library, NGV.23 For Mortensen’s 1975 Delicatessen installation and performance, see Anne Marsh, Body and Self: Performance Art in Australia, 1969–92 (Melbourne: Australian Video Art Archive (AVAA), Monash University, 1993), 8, as well as 23–24, 35 for commentary on the Pinacotheca Gallery, Richmond, another important early setting for performance art during this period.24 Kaldor Public Art Projects, Project 03: Gilbert & George, https://archive.kaldorartprojects.org.au/index.php/Detail/objects/26. For discussion, see Sophie Forbat, ed., Kaldor Public Art Projects, exhibition catalogue (Sydney: John Kaldor, Art Gallery of New South Wales, 2009), 86–99.25 Jennifer Phipps and Geoff Burke, eds., Performance, Documents, Film, Video, exhibition catalogue, National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne, August 28–September 28, 1975. For discussion, see Stephen Jones, ‘Video Art at the National Gallery of Victoria, 1973–78’, Art Journal 52 (2013), https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/essay/video-art-at-the-national-gallery-of-victoria-1973-78/; and Mendelssohn et al., Australian Art Exhibitions, 78–79.26 Daniel Thomas notes ‘its suggestion of protest against American cultural imperialism, and perhaps also of more diffuse anti-Americanism on account of the then recent Vietnam war quagmire’. Daniel Thomas, ‘Fleshly Moralities: Ivan Durrant in Melbourne’, Art Monthly Australia 172 (August 2004): 33.27 The artist also stressed that the dead cow happening had ‘nothing to do with Anti-Americanism’ in an interview with the author on 13 February 2023.28 The artist, quoted in Jill Bowen, ‘Ivan the Terrible: He’s at it Again’, Cleo, August 1976, 26.29 For the international context to institutional critique, see Blake Stimson, ‘What was Institutional Critique?’, in Alexander Alberro and Blake Stimson, eds., Institutional Critique: An Anthology of Artists’ Writings (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009), 20–42. For institutional critique in relation to more contemporary practices, see Janet Marstine, Critical Practice: Artists, Museums, Ethics (Routledge: London, 2017), 6–13.30 For discussion, see Green, Peripheral Vision, 31; Catherine Speck and Joanna Mendelssohn, ‘The 1970s: Curators Framing the Avant-Garde in Writing and Rewriting Art History’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Art 17, no. 1 (2017): 106.31 Alberro and Stimson, Institutional Critique, 8, 170–99. For Art & Language’s relationship with Australian art and criticism during this period, see Heather Barker and Charles Green, ‘The Provincialism Problem: Terry Smith and Centre-Periphery Art History’, Journal of Art Historiography 3 (2010): 3–17.32 Rodney James, ‘Blood Red: Ivan Durrant’s Social Conscience’, Ivan Durrant: Barrier Draw, 66–85.33 Geoff Robertson, ‘Cow Slaughter’, ABC News, May 26, 1975, ABC Research Archives.34 Zombies of the Stratosphere, directed by Fred C. Brannon, Los Angeles, CA: Republic Pictures, 1952, https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0045352/.35 ‘Protesters Arrested after Gluing Themselves to Picasso Painting at NGV in Melbourne’, ABC News, October 10, 2022, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-10-09/protesters-glue-themselves-to-picasso-painting-ngv-in-melbourne/101516560; ‘Extinction Rebellion Activists Glue onto Picasso Painting at the NGV’, Extinction Rebellion Australia, October 10, 2022, https://ausrebellion.earth/news/extinction-rebellion-activists-glue-on-to-picasso-painting-at-the-ngv/.36 ‘Alas Poor Daisy, I Knew Her Well’, The Age, May 27, 1975.37 Roy Grounds, Frederick Romberg and Robin Boyd, The National Art Gallery and Cultural Centre (Melbourne: J. Creffield Pty Ltd, 1960); for discussion see Christopher R. Marshall, ‘Between Beauty and Power: Henry Moore’s Draped Seated Woman as an Emblem of the National Gallery of Victoria’s Modernity, 1959–68’, Art Journal 46 (2006): 42–43, https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/essay/between-beauty-and-power-henry-moores-draped-seated-woman-as-an-emblem-of-the-national-gallery-of-victorias-modernity-1959-68/.38 A connection also noted in Philip Goad, ‘An Oriental Palazzo: Roy Grounds and the National Gallery of Victoria’, Backlogue 3 (1993): 76.39 Marshall, ‘Between Beauty and Power’, 36–49, 72–73.40 Christopher R. Marshall, ‘Monumental Sculpture and Institutional Identity at the National Gallery of Victoria: From Here to Eternity, and Back’, in Interesting Times: New Roles for Collections, Museums Australian National Conference Proceedings 2010 (Canberra: Museums Australia, 2011), 105–07, https://www.amaga.org.au/sites/default/files/uploaded-content/website-content/Conferences/2010/ma2010_conference_papers.pdf.41 Mary Eagle, ‘Hopping in for his Chop’, The Age, March 30, 1978.42 Paul Heinrichs, ‘A $6000 Stake in “Meat”’, The Age, May 31, 1978.43 Ivan Durrant: Barrier Draw, 72–76.44 Paul Heinrichs, ‘Art Tastes Meet the Market’, The Age, March 21, 1978.45 Ivan Durrant, interview with the author, February 13, 2023.46 Ivan Durrant: Barrier Draw, 25.47 Brian Blackwell, ‘Horror Art Movie Seen by Kids: Shock Scenes as igeons haHcked to Death’, The Truth, June 2, 1979.48 Bill Hitchings, ‘“Revenge” heory on Slashed Painting’, The Herald, June 18, 1979.49 Ibid.; Marsali MacKinnon, ‘Art Slashing to be Probed’, The Sun, June 19, 1979.50 Ibid.51 ‘Angry Artist Grieves’, The Age, October 3, 1979.52 ‘Artist Durrant Sues Gallery’, The Sun, October 4, 1979.53 Ivan Durrant, letter to Robert Lindsay, September 14, 1986, Ivan Durrant artist file, Shaw Research Library, NGV.54 Documentation for this proposal can be found in the artist’s file at the Shaw Research Library, NGV, for discussion of which, see Thomas, ‘Fleshly Moralities’, 34.55 Ivan Durrant: Barrier Draw, exhibition catalogue, by David Hurlston with Rodney James and Barry Dickins, National Gallery of Victoria: Australia, May 1–October 25, 2020 (Melbourne: NGV Publications, 2020).56 Durrant quoted in Bowen, ‘Ivan the Terrible’, 26. The quote was made in relation to Ivan Durrant’s severed hand happening of June 1975.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冒险的生意:伊凡·杜兰特对维多利亚国家美术馆
本文的早期版本已在AAANZ 2022年会议的“博物馆与风险”会议上发布。我要感谢其他与会者的贡献,以及匿名读者提供的最有帮助的建议。还要感谢David Hurlston和Ivan Durrant慷慨地回答了我的问题。注1“现代大师”展览的历史意义,见《了解博物馆:澳大利亚博物馆与博物馆学》(2011),Des Griffin和Leon Paroissien主编,澳大利亚国家博物馆,https://nma.gov.au/research/understanding-museums/Issues_museology_introduction.html;尤其是丹尼尔·托马斯,“澳大利亚艺术博物馆:个人账户”,https://nma.gov.au/research/understanding-museums/DThomas_2011.html;卡罗琳·特纳,“国际展览”,https://nma.gov.au/research/understanding-museums/CTurner_2011.html;乔安娜·门德尔松、凯瑟琳·德·洛伦佐、艾莉森·英格利斯和凯瑟琳·斯佩克,澳大利亚艺术展:打开我们的眼睛(墨尔本:泰晤士和哈德逊,2018),95.2《总理开幕致辞》,《现代大师:《马奈到马蒂斯,在新南威尔士美术馆,悉尼,1975年4月9日》,可在https://pmtranscripts.pmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/original/00003691.pdf3上查阅。关于澳大利亚政府在保护国际出借展览方面的作用,见Jim Berryman,《艺术与国家利益:澳大利亚“轰动展览”的外交起源》,《澳大利亚研究杂志》第37期。惠特拉姆政府的艺术政策,见同上,163-64;和门德尔松等人,澳大利亚艺术展览,46-52。关于1973年获得的杰克逊·波洛克的《蓝柱》,见《总理的圣诞贺卡:惠特拉姆时代的“蓝柱”和文化政治》(悉尼:Power Publications, 2001), 13-44页,林赛·巴雷特,“大都会日报时代的艺术作品”;和特里·史密斯,“将绘画置于危险之中:杰克逊·波洛克的蓝杆”,杰克逊·波洛克的“蓝杆”,安东尼·怀特编辑,展览目录(堪培拉:澳大利亚国家美术馆,2002年),59-62.5莫林·吉尔克里斯特,“我们艺术史上伟大的一天”,时代杂志,1975年5月27日星期二;无作者,“现代大师来到墨尔本的夜晚”,《先驱报》,1975.6,同上7,《先驱报》,1975.6,6月21日,格雷格·麦肯齐,“我要在舞台上杀死那头牛:艺术家”,《太阳报》,1975.9,“莫纳什牛,德克萨斯州28/5/75,EX FILM NTV1639, 1.58”,ABC研究档案馆;“莫纳什大学取消了原定在亚历山大剧院上演的伊万·达兰特的演出”,ABC研究档案。描述是这样写的:“未经编辑的版本,奶牛在围场被屠杀(真实的枪击事件没有出现在《时事》中),奶牛被扔在台阶上。”澳大利亚:牛杀死一个愤怒的抗议浪潮(1975)“英国代,https://www.britishpathe.com/video/VLVA2GG9QNTKLPWC7HSJ0KE5O0BMR-AUSTRALIA-COW-KILLING-AN-ANGRY-WAVE-OF-PROTEST/query/durrant.11艺术家引用的100美元的罚款,倾销死牛”,年龄,7月24日,1975.12“Dead-Cow“艺术”在画廊”,太阳,星期二,5月27日1975.13维多利亚国家美术馆,受托人委员会,1975年6月3日,导演的报告,V (b)的下降的死牛的画廊”,肖研究图书馆,NGV.14裁判法院,墨尔本。1975年6月9日,《关于立即应受惩罚的罪行的资料和传票》,艺术家收藏关于1975年6月伊万·杜兰特的断手,见展览目录,大卫·赫尔斯顿与罗德尼·詹姆斯和巴里·迪金斯合著,澳大利亚维多利亚国家美术馆,2020年5月1日至10月25日(墨尔本:NGV出版社,2020年),24-25页;68-69.16 Eva Dodd,“艺术新闻”,Toorak Times, 1975年6月10日。17“倾倒一头死牛罚款100美元”尼尔·豪,平行现实:澳大利亚行为艺术的发展(伦敦:泰晤士和哈德逊,2017),275-76.19格雷姆·斯特金,“公共场合的私人仪式”,《澳大利亚人报》,1975年8月2日。20杰弗里·马金,“重症护理艺术:病了”,《太阳报》,1975年6月30日。查尔斯·格林,《周边视觉:当代澳大利亚艺术1970-1994》(墨尔本:Craftsman House, 1995), 12-13;凯瑟琳·路易斯·格雷戈里,《艺术家和博物馆:1975-2002年澳大利亚艺术和博物馆学中有争议的历史和扩展叙事》(博士论文)。,墨尔本大学,2004),18-24;和门德尔松等人,澳大利亚艺术展览,78-80.22星期四1975年8月21日-“抗议维多利亚国家美术馆”,肖研究图书馆,NGV。 23莫滕森1975年的熟食店装置和表演,见安妮·马什,《身体与自我:澳大利亚的行为艺术,1969-92》(墨尔本:澳大利亚视频艺术档案馆,莫纳什大学,1993),8,以及对里士满Pinacotheca画廊的评论,这是这一时期行为艺术的另一个重要的早期背景卡尔多公共艺术项目,项目03:吉尔伯特和乔治,https://archive.kaldorartprojects.org.au/index.php/Detail/objects/26。关于讨论,见Sophie Forbat主编,Kaldor公共艺术项目,展览目录(悉尼:John Kaldor, Art Gallery of New South Wales, 2009), 86-99.25,表演,文献,电影,录像,展览目录,维多利亚国家美术馆,墨尔本,1975年8月28日至9月28日。参见Stephen Jones,“维多利亚国家美术馆的录像艺术,1973-78”,Art Journal 52 (2013), https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/essay/video-art-at-the-national-gallery-of-victoria-1973-78/;和Mendelssohn等人,澳大利亚艺术展览,78-79.26丹尼尔·托马斯指出“它暗示了对美国文化帝国主义的抗议,也可能是由于当时越南战争的泥潭而更广泛的反美主义”。丹尼尔·托马斯,“肉体的道德:墨尔本的伊万·杜兰特”,澳大利亚艺术月刊172(2004年8月):33.27这位艺术家在2023年2月13日对作者的采访中也强调,死牛的发生“与反美主义无关”。这位艺术家引用于吉尔·鲍恩,“伊凡雷帝:他又来了”,克莱奥,1976年8月,26.29。,见亚历山大·阿尔伯罗和布莱克·斯廷森主编。,《制度批判:艺术家作品选集》(马萨诸塞州剑桥:麻省理工学院出版社,2009),第20-42页。关于与更当代实践相关的制度批判,见Janet Marstine,批判实践:艺术家,博物馆,伦理(Routledge: London, 2017), 6-13.30。凯瑟琳·斯佩克和乔安娜·门德尔松,“20世纪70年代:策展人在写作和重写艺术史中构建前卫”,《澳大利亚和新西兰艺术杂志》,第17期。艾伯洛和史汀生:《制度批判》,第8期,170-99。关于艺术与语言在这一时期与澳大利亚艺术和批评的关系,见Heather Barker和Charles Green,“地方主义问题:特里·史密斯和中心边缘艺术史”,《艺术史杂志》3(2010):3 - 17.32。Rodney James,“血色:Ivan Durrant的社会良知”,Ivan Durrant:34《平流层僵尸》,由弗雷德·c·布兰农执导,洛杉矶,加州:共和影业,1952年,https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0045352/.35“在墨尔本NGV,把自己粘在毕加索画作上被捕的抗议者”,ABC新闻,2022年10月10日,https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-10-09/protesters-glue-themselves-to-picasso-painting-ngv-in-melbourne/101516560;“灭绝叛乱活动家在NGV的毕加索画作上粘贴”,灭绝叛乱澳大利亚,2022年10月10日,https://ausrebellion.earth/news/extinction-rebellion-activists-glue-on-to-picasso-painting-at-the-ngv/.36“唉,可怜的黛西,我很了解她”,时代,1975年5月27日。罗伊·Grounds,弗雷德里克·隆伯格和罗宾·博伊德,国家艺术画廊和文化中心(墨尔本:J. Creffield Pty Ltd, 1960);参见Christopher R. Marshall,《在美与权力之间:亨利·摩尔的披着斗篷的坐着的女人作为维多利亚现代性国家美术馆的象征,1959-68》,Art Journal 46 (2006): 42-43, https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/essay/between-beauty-and-power-henry-moores-draped-seated-woman-as-an-emblem-of-the-national-gallery-of-victorias-modernity-1959-68/.38 Philip Goad,《东方宫殿》中也提到了这种联系:马歇尔,“在美与权力之间”,36-49,72-73.40克里斯托弗·r·马歇尔,“维多利亚国家美术馆的纪念性雕塑和机构认同:从这里到永恒,再回来”,《有趣的时代:藏品的新角色》,2010年澳大利亚国家博物馆会议文集(堪培拉:澳大利亚博物馆,2011年),105-07,https://www.amaga.org.au/sites/default/files/uploaded-content/website-content/Conferences/2010/ma2010_conference_papers.pdf.41玛丽·伊格尔,“为他的剁手而跳”,时代杂志,1978.3.42保罗·海因里希斯,“6000美元的“肉”股票”,时代杂志,1978.5.43伊凡·杜兰特:障碍绘画,72-76.44保罗·海因里希斯,“艺术品味满足市场”,时代杂志,1978.3.21 45伊凡·杜兰特,对作者的采访,2023.2.13 46伊凡·杜兰特:障碍绘画,25岁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Responses to Charles Esche, The First Exhibition of the Twenty-First Century—Lumbung 1 (Documenta Fifteen), What Happened, and What It Might Mean Two Years On Three Projects Peripheral to Documentas 7, 8 and IX The First Exhibition of the Twenty-First Century—Lumbung 1 (Documenta Fifteen), What Happened, and What It Might Mean Two Years On Defunct Infrastructure: On the 60th Venice Biennale, Stranieri Ovunque–Foreigners Everywhere Unorchestrated Symphony: documenta fifteen as a Site of Resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1