Towards a Mobile 3D Documentation Solution. Video-Based Photogrammetry and iPhone 12 Pro as Fieldwork Documentation Tools

Nikolai Paukkonen
{"title":"Towards a Mobile 3D Documentation Solution. Video-Based Photogrammetry and iPhone 12 Pro as Fieldwork Documentation Tools","authors":"Nikolai Paukkonen","doi":"10.5334/jcaa.135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New affordable equipment suitable for 3D fieldwork documentation has appeared during the last years. Both photogrammetry and laser scanning are becoming affordable for archaeologists, who often work with limited resources and tight time constraints. This paper compares two such approaches and their workflows. Photogrammetry based on a video captured by a DJI Osmo Pocket gimbal camera and iPhone 12 Pro LiDAR scans are performed on a Finnish Early modern period archaeological project. A reference point cloud was created using a heavier terrestrial laser scanner. By comparing the acquisition processes and the accuracy and precision of the results, the potential of these new documentation methods can be evaluated. In addition to their precision and geometric accuracy, the methods are also compared in terms of ease of use and time constraints. The results demonstrate that although these technologies are still far from perfect, they provide a glimpse into the future of 3D field documentation. Archaeologists can achieve sufficiently precise 3D documentation for distinct phases of excavation in an Early Modern period site without requiring an extravagant budget or special skills. However, the results indicate that the quality may not be adequate for fieldwork projects requiring more precise data, such as Neolithic period excavations.","PeriodicalId":32632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New affordable equipment suitable for 3D fieldwork documentation has appeared during the last years. Both photogrammetry and laser scanning are becoming affordable for archaeologists, who often work with limited resources and tight time constraints. This paper compares two such approaches and their workflows. Photogrammetry based on a video captured by a DJI Osmo Pocket gimbal camera and iPhone 12 Pro LiDAR scans are performed on a Finnish Early modern period archaeological project. A reference point cloud was created using a heavier terrestrial laser scanner. By comparing the acquisition processes and the accuracy and precision of the results, the potential of these new documentation methods can be evaluated. In addition to their precision and geometric accuracy, the methods are also compared in terms of ease of use and time constraints. The results demonstrate that although these technologies are still far from perfect, they provide a glimpse into the future of 3D field documentation. Archaeologists can achieve sufficiently precise 3D documentation for distinct phases of excavation in an Early Modern period site without requiring an extravagant budget or special skills. However, the results indicate that the quality may not be adequate for fieldwork projects requiring more precise data, such as Neolithic period excavations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
迈向移动3D文档解决方案。基于视频的摄影测量和iPhone 12 Pro作为实地工作文档工具
在过去的几年中,出现了适合3D现场工作文档的新型经济实惠的设备。对于考古学家来说,摄影测量和激光扫描都是负担得起的,他们经常在有限的资源和紧迫的时间限制下工作。本文比较了这两种方法及其工作流程。在芬兰的一个早期现代考古项目中,基于大疆Osmo Pocket万向相机拍摄的视频和iPhone 12 Pro激光雷达扫描进行摄影测量。参考点云是用较重的地面激光扫描仪创建的。通过比较采集过程和结果的准确性和精密度,可以评估这些新的记录方法的潜力。除了精度和几何精度外,还比较了这些方法的易用性和时间限制。结果表明,尽管这些技术还远远不够完美,但它们为3D现场文档的未来提供了一瞥。考古学家可以在不需要巨额预算或特殊技能的情况下,对早期现代遗址的不同挖掘阶段进行足够精确的3D记录。然而,结果表明,对于需要更精确数据的实地工作项目,例如新石器时代的挖掘,质量可能不足够。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Open-Access Archaeological Predictive Modeling Using Zonal Statistics: A Case Study from Zanzibar, Tanzania Architecture Reality and Perception: The Multicultural Nature of Egyptian Domestic Architecture in the Roman Period Geographic Information Systems in Archaeology: A Systematic Review Automatic Normalization of Temporal Expressions Executable Map Paper (EMaP) for Archaeological LiDAR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1