Nashwah Khadeeja, Amitesh Narayan, Shreekanth D Karnad, Vijaya Kumar K
{"title":"Predictive Validity of Parent-Reported PEDI-CAT Mobility and Gross Motor Function Measure in Children with Cerebral Palsy","authors":"Nashwah Khadeeja, Amitesh Narayan, Shreekanth D Karnad, Vijaya Kumar K","doi":"10.1615/critrevphysrehabilmed.2023049196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recent contemporary studies demonstrated strong correlation between Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) and parent-reported Mobility domain of Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory-Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT Mobility) in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP). Hence, a need arose to investigate the prospect of predicting GMFM-66 scores using PEDI-CAT Mobility domain scores to estimate a child’s gross motor function score. Objectives: To examine the predictability of GMFM-66 scores using PEDI-CAT Mobility scores in children with CP at Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels II and III. Methods: GMFM-66 and PEDI-CAT Mobility scales were administered to 24 children with CP at GMFCS levels II and III. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated and an association between the two scores was obtained. Regression analysis was done to predict GMFM-66 scores from the PEDI-CAT Mobility scores. Results: GMFM-66 scores and the PEDI-CAT Mobility scores showed strong positive correlation in children with CP [GMFCS level II (r = 0.876, p= 0.006); and GMFCS level III (r= 0.709, p<0.002)]. Regression analysis generated two equations for each level which were used to predict GMFM-66 scores from the PEDI-CAT Mobility scores. Conclusion: The association is strong between the two scores (GMFM-66 scores and PEDI-CAT Mobility scores). Hence, PEDI-CAT Mobility domain scores can be used to predict the corresponding GMFM-66 scores in children with CP at GMFCS levels II and III with moderate to high accuracy. Keywords: GMFM-66, PEDI-CAT Mobility, Cerebral Palsy, GMFCS","PeriodicalId":55870,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevphysrehabilmed.2023049196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Recent contemporary studies demonstrated strong correlation between Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) and parent-reported Mobility domain of Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory-Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT Mobility) in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP). Hence, a need arose to investigate the prospect of predicting GMFM-66 scores using PEDI-CAT Mobility domain scores to estimate a child’s gross motor function score. Objectives: To examine the predictability of GMFM-66 scores using PEDI-CAT Mobility scores in children with CP at Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels II and III. Methods: GMFM-66 and PEDI-CAT Mobility scales were administered to 24 children with CP at GMFCS levels II and III. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated and an association between the two scores was obtained. Regression analysis was done to predict GMFM-66 scores from the PEDI-CAT Mobility scores. Results: GMFM-66 scores and the PEDI-CAT Mobility scores showed strong positive correlation in children with CP [GMFCS level II (r = 0.876, p= 0.006); and GMFCS level III (r= 0.709, p<0.002)]. Regression analysis generated two equations for each level which were used to predict GMFM-66 scores from the PEDI-CAT Mobility scores. Conclusion: The association is strong between the two scores (GMFM-66 scores and PEDI-CAT Mobility scores). Hence, PEDI-CAT Mobility domain scores can be used to predict the corresponding GMFM-66 scores in children with CP at GMFCS levels II and III with moderate to high accuracy. Keywords: GMFM-66, PEDI-CAT Mobility, Cerebral Palsy, GMFCS
期刊介绍:
Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine encompasses all healing technologies other than those based on altering body chemistry (drugs) or integrity (surgery). The journal provides reviews of well-established diagnostic methods, clinical modalities and techniques and physical and rehabilitation medicine. The journal appears quarterly and includes from one to four articles that summarize and evaluate the current status of an important topic in the field of physical and rehabilitation medicine. Topics and authors are chosen by members of our distinguished Editorial Board, all of whom are leading practitioners, researchers, and active contributors to the literature in their area of expertise.