An Empirical Analysis of the Impacts of Investment Incentives on Provincial Economic Growth in Turkey

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES Ekonomika Regiona-Economy of Region Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-3-22
H. Yanıkkaya, K. Altay
{"title":"An Empirical Analysis of the Impacts of Investment Incentives on Provincial Economic Growth in Turkey","authors":"H. Yanıkkaya, K. Altay","doi":"10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-3-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are significant differences between governments in the context of the objectives of incentive policies. However, they are generally focused on macroeconomic purposes such as eliminating regional inequalities and increasing investment level, employment, industrialisation and therefore raising economic growth. In Turkey, The New Investment Incentive System, which has been implemented since 2012, essentially aimed to mitigate interregional inequalities. This study investigates the impact of investment incentives on provincial per capita growth of 81 provinces for the years 2004-2017. Our data are also available for capital types and sectoral levels. The dynamic panel data estimates show that while the impact of the number of incentive certificates on provincial growth is significantly positive, there is no effect of fixed investment and employment on provincial growth. Moreover, given the significantly positive estimated coefficients on all three measures of investment incentives for the energy and manufacturing sectors, we conclude that incentives raise provincial growth for these two sectors. However, investment incentives in services, mining and agriculture sectors have no impact on regional growth. Results of the analysis of investment incentives by investor type imply that while investment incentives provided to domestic firms have no effect on growth, incentives for firms owned by foreigners have positive effects. Our study thus makes important contributions to the literature by considering both province-level incentive measures and five main sectors, namely energy, manufacturing, services, mining and agriculture in the sectoral analysis.","PeriodicalId":51978,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomika Regiona-Economy of Region","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomika Regiona-Economy of Region","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-3-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are significant differences between governments in the context of the objectives of incentive policies. However, they are generally focused on macroeconomic purposes such as eliminating regional inequalities and increasing investment level, employment, industrialisation and therefore raising economic growth. In Turkey, The New Investment Incentive System, which has been implemented since 2012, essentially aimed to mitigate interregional inequalities. This study investigates the impact of investment incentives on provincial per capita growth of 81 provinces for the years 2004-2017. Our data are also available for capital types and sectoral levels. The dynamic panel data estimates show that while the impact of the number of incentive certificates on provincial growth is significantly positive, there is no effect of fixed investment and employment on provincial growth. Moreover, given the significantly positive estimated coefficients on all three measures of investment incentives for the energy and manufacturing sectors, we conclude that incentives raise provincial growth for these two sectors. However, investment incentives in services, mining and agriculture sectors have no impact on regional growth. Results of the analysis of investment incentives by investor type imply that while investment incentives provided to domestic firms have no effect on growth, incentives for firms owned by foreigners have positive effects. Our study thus makes important contributions to the literature by considering both province-level incentive measures and five main sectors, namely energy, manufacturing, services, mining and agriculture in the sectoral analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投资激励对土耳其省级经济增长影响的实证分析
各国政府在激励政策目标方面存在显著差异。然而,它们通常侧重于宏观经济目的,如消除区域不平等,提高投资水平,就业,工业化,从而提高经济增长。在土耳其,自2012年以来实施的新投资激励制度的主要目的是减轻地区间的不平等。本文研究了2004-2017年81个省份的投资激励对省级人均经济增长的影响。我们还提供了资本类型和行业水平的数据。动态面板数据估计表明,虽然激励证书数量对省级增长的影响显著为正,但固定投资和就业对省级增长没有影响。此外,考虑到能源和制造业投资激励的所有三项措施的估计系数都显着为正,我们得出结论,激励措施提高了这两个行业的省级增长。然而,服务业、采矿业和农业部门的投资激励措施对区域增长没有影响。按投资者类型对投资激励的分析结果表明,提供给国内企业的投资激励对增长没有影响,而提供给外资企业的投资激励对增长有积极影响。因此,我们的研究在部门分析中考虑了省级激励措施和五个主要部门,即能源、制造业、服务业、采矿业和农业,对文献做出了重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Regional Economic Conditions on Place Branding Results: The Survival Analysis Approach Sustainable Rural Development: A New Perspective on the Assessment in the Context of Spatial Localisation Assessment of the Consistency of Regional and Municipal Strategic Planning Documents Stakeholder Approach to the Regional Sustainable Development: Empirical Study Creative Reindustrialisation of the Second-Tier Cities in the Digital Transformation Era: A Study Using SciVal Tools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1