The customer perception of project value scale: development and validation

IF 4 Q2 BUSINESS European Business Review Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1108/ebr-09-2022-0177
Eduardo André Cândido Da Silva, Flávio Santino Bizarrias, Renato Penha, Luciano Ferreira da Silva, Cristiane Drebes Pedron
{"title":"The customer perception of project value scale: development and validation","authors":"Eduardo André Cândido Da Silva, Flávio Santino Bizarrias, Renato Penha, Luciano Ferreira da Silva, Cristiane Drebes Pedron","doi":"10.1108/ebr-09-2022-0177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Despite the significant interest from researchers and practitioners, the literature on project value measurement from the perspective of the customer is non-existent. This study aims to address this gap by developing and validating a scale to measure project value through a customer lens called the customer perception of project value scale. Design/methodology/approach A list of items was initially generated based on 762 sample responses through a systematic review of the literature and with the participation of specialists. Exploratory and confirmatory factorial analyses and structural equation modelling were used to develop and validate the scale. Findings The authors formulated a four-dimension scale. The dimensions used to measure the second-order construct are customer centrality, process, delivery and cost-benefit. This was validated using a nomological structure. Research limitations/implications The non-consensual nature of what is value in projects restricts the results of this study to the context of a specific group of stakeholders only, that is, the consumers of the projects. The authors also see limitations in the absence of competing scales, which do not allow the comparison of the instrument with alternative measures. Practical implications This study allows project managers and other professionals to measure a project’s perceived value from the customer’s point of view and manage the improvement of this perception. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to propose a scale to measure project value, which advances the literature on project management and value and contributes to academic knowledge and practice by measuring project value from the customer standpoint.","PeriodicalId":47867,"journal":{"name":"European Business Review","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-09-2022-0177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Despite the significant interest from researchers and practitioners, the literature on project value measurement from the perspective of the customer is non-existent. This study aims to address this gap by developing and validating a scale to measure project value through a customer lens called the customer perception of project value scale. Design/methodology/approach A list of items was initially generated based on 762 sample responses through a systematic review of the literature and with the participation of specialists. Exploratory and confirmatory factorial analyses and structural equation modelling were used to develop and validate the scale. Findings The authors formulated a four-dimension scale. The dimensions used to measure the second-order construct are customer centrality, process, delivery and cost-benefit. This was validated using a nomological structure. Research limitations/implications The non-consensual nature of what is value in projects restricts the results of this study to the context of a specific group of stakeholders only, that is, the consumers of the projects. The authors also see limitations in the absence of competing scales, which do not allow the comparison of the instrument with alternative measures. Practical implications This study allows project managers and other professionals to measure a project’s perceived value from the customer’s point of view and manage the improvement of this perception. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to propose a scale to measure project value, which advances the literature on project management and value and contributes to academic knowledge and practice by measuring project value from the customer standpoint.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
客户对项目价值规模的感知:开发和验证
尽管研究人员和实践者对项目价值测量非常感兴趣,但从客户的角度进行项目价值测量的文献是不存在的。本研究旨在通过开发和验证一个尺度,通过客户视角衡量项目价值,即客户对项目价值尺度的感知,来解决这一差距。设计/方法/方法通过对文献的系统回顾和专家的参与,最初根据762个样本回复生成了项目清单。探索性和验证性因子分析和结构方程模型被用来开发和验证量表。作者制定了一个四维量表。用于测量二阶结构的维度是客户中心、流程、交付和成本效益。这是通过一个逻辑结构来验证的。项目价值的非协商一致性质限制了本研究的结果仅局限于特定利益相关者群体的背景下,即项目的消费者。作者还看到了缺乏竞争尺度的局限性,这使得无法将该工具与其他测量方法进行比较。本研究允许项目经理和其他专业人员从客户的角度衡量项目的感知价值,并管理这种感知的改进。据作者所知,这是第一个提出衡量项目价值的尺度的研究,它推进了项目管理和价值的文献,并有助于从客户的角度衡量项目价值的学术知识和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Articles should cover the key business disciplines - management, leadership, marketing, logistics, strategy, quality management, entrepreneurship, business ethics, international business, operations management, manufacturing, accounting and finance - specifically relating to experiences and reflections of interest to business and academia worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Does corporate green innovation unlock financial doors? The mediating role of environmental performance Challenges and strategies of gamification in family businesses: the moderating effects of supervision and engagement Empowering waqf (Islamic endowment) entrepreneurs: a study of the key motivational factors underlying waqf-based entrepreneurship in Indonesia Sustainability and software development projects: leadership, core self-evaluation and empowerment as critical success factors Identifying enablers for the successful deployment of prescriptive analytics – a multiple case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1