Are open educational resources (OER) and practices (OEP) effective in improving learning achievement? A meta-analysis and research synthesis

IF 8.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1186/s41239-023-00424-3
Ahmed Tlili, Juan Garzón, Soheil Salha, Ronghuai Huang, Lin Xu, Daniel Burgos, Mouna Denden, Orna Farrell, Robert Farrow, Aras Bozkurt, Tel Amiel, Rory McGreal, Aída López-Serrano, David Wiley
{"title":"Are open educational resources (OER) and practices (OEP) effective in improving learning achievement? A meta-analysis and research synthesis","authors":"Ahmed Tlili, Juan Garzón, Soheil Salha, Ronghuai Huang, Lin Xu, Daniel Burgos, Mouna Denden, Orna Farrell, Robert Farrow, Aras Bozkurt, Tel Amiel, Rory McGreal, Aída López-Serrano, David Wiley","doi":"10.1186/s41239-023-00424-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract While several studies have investigated the various effects of open educational resources (OER) and open educational practices (OEP), few have focused on its connection to learning achievement. The related scientific literature is divided about the effects of OER and OEP with regards to their contribution to learning achievement. To address this tension, a meta-analysis and research synthesis of 25 studies ( N = 119,840 participants) was conducted to quantitatively investigate the effects of OER and OEP on students’ learning achievement. The analysis included course subject, level of education, intervention duration, sample size, geographical distribution, and research design as moderating variables of the obtained effects. The findings revealed that OER and OEP have a significant yet negligible ( g = 0.07, p < 0.001) effect. Additionally, the analysis found that the obtained effect can be moderated by several variables, including course subject, level of education and geographical distribution. The study findings can help various stakeholders (e.g., educators, instructional designers or policy makers) in understanding what might hinder OER and OEP effect on learning achievement, hence accommodating better learning outcomes and more effective interventions.","PeriodicalId":13871,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00424-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract While several studies have investigated the various effects of open educational resources (OER) and open educational practices (OEP), few have focused on its connection to learning achievement. The related scientific literature is divided about the effects of OER and OEP with regards to their contribution to learning achievement. To address this tension, a meta-analysis and research synthesis of 25 studies ( N = 119,840 participants) was conducted to quantitatively investigate the effects of OER and OEP on students’ learning achievement. The analysis included course subject, level of education, intervention duration, sample size, geographical distribution, and research design as moderating variables of the obtained effects. The findings revealed that OER and OEP have a significant yet negligible ( g = 0.07, p < 0.001) effect. Additionally, the analysis found that the obtained effect can be moderated by several variables, including course subject, level of education and geographical distribution. The study findings can help various stakeholders (e.g., educators, instructional designers or policy makers) in understanding what might hinder OER and OEP effect on learning achievement, hence accommodating better learning outcomes and more effective interventions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开放教育资源(OER)和实践(OEP)在提高学习成绩方面是否有效?荟萃分析和综合研究
虽然有一些研究调查了开放教育资源(OER)和开放教育实践(OEP)的各种影响,但很少有人关注其与学习成就的联系。关于OER和OEP对学习成就的贡献,相关的科学文献存在分歧。为了解决这种紧张关系,我们对25项研究(N = 119,840名参与者)进行了荟萃分析和研究综合,以定量调查OER和OEP对学生学习成绩的影响。分析包括课程科目、教育水平、干预持续时间、样本量、地理分布和研究设计作为获得效果的调节变量。结果显示OER和OEP有显著但可忽略的差异(g = 0.07, p <0.001)的效果。此外,分析发现,所获得的效果可以被几个变量调节,包括课程科目,教育水平和地理分布。研究结果可以帮助不同的利益相关者(如教育工作者、教学设计师或政策制定者)了解什么可能阻碍OER和OEP对学习成绩的影响,从而适应更好的学习成果和更有效的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
4.70%
发文量
59
审稿时长
76.7 days
期刊介绍: This journal seeks to foster the sharing of critical scholarly works and information exchange across diverse cultural perspectives in the fields of technology-enhanced and digital learning in higher education. It aims to advance scientific knowledge on the human and personal aspects of technology use in higher education, while keeping readers informed about the latest developments in applying digital technologies to learning, training, research, and management.
期刊最新文献
Mediation/moderation effects of engagement, foreign language enjoyment, and ambiguity tolerance in metaverse-based foreign language learning Comparison of generative AI performance on undergraduate and postgraduate written assessments in the biomedical sciences Simple techniques to bypass GenAI text detectors: implications for inclusive education Understanding college students’ test anxiety in asynchronous online courses: the mediating role of emotional engagement Rethinking assessment strategies to improve authentic representations of learning: using blogs as a creative assessment alternative to develop professional skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1