Deviations from the Mandatory Adoption of IFRS in Europe? Why Non-Adoption Does Not Mean Non-Compliance

IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE European Accounting Review Pub Date : 2023-05-09 DOI:10.1080/09638180.2023.2197248
Christopher Nobes, Christian Stadler
{"title":"Deviations from the Mandatory Adoption of IFRS in Europe? Why Non-Adoption Does Not Mean Non-Compliance","authors":"Christopher Nobes, Christian Stadler","doi":"10.1080/09638180.2023.2197248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using Worldscope data, Pownall and Wieczynska (2018) [Deviations from the mandatory adoption of IFRS in the European Union: Implementation, enforcement, incentives, and compliance. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(2), 1029–1066] show that there was extensive non-adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) by European listed firms in 2005–2012. They also suggest that much of this non-adoption is illegal. This would constitute a serious failing by European firms, auditors and regulators. However, in this note we show that there is no non-compliance with mandatory requirements to use IFRS in Germany and the UK in various years including 2012 and 2020. We also find no non-compliance in Austria and Portugal, two countries with less highly regarded enforcement. The reasons for legitimate non-adoption vary by country and by year. Our analysis is based on hand-collected data and it documents that the Worldscope database contains many errors in various fields. Therefore, we provide researchers with a hand-collected database for German and UK firms for the period 2005–2020, which can be used to supplement Worldscope. The database includes information on country of incorporation, whether consolidated financial statements are prepared, the accounting standards applied, and whether the firm is listed on an EU-regulated market. We use the database to provide some evidence on voluntary adoption of IFRS.","PeriodicalId":11764,"journal":{"name":"European Accounting Review","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2023.2197248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using Worldscope data, Pownall and Wieczynska (2018) [Deviations from the mandatory adoption of IFRS in the European Union: Implementation, enforcement, incentives, and compliance. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(2), 1029–1066] show that there was extensive non-adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) by European listed firms in 2005–2012. They also suggest that much of this non-adoption is illegal. This would constitute a serious failing by European firms, auditors and regulators. However, in this note we show that there is no non-compliance with mandatory requirements to use IFRS in Germany and the UK in various years including 2012 and 2020. We also find no non-compliance in Austria and Portugal, two countries with less highly regarded enforcement. The reasons for legitimate non-adoption vary by country and by year. Our analysis is based on hand-collected data and it documents that the Worldscope database contains many errors in various fields. Therefore, we provide researchers with a hand-collected database for German and UK firms for the period 2005–2020, which can be used to supplement Worldscope. The database includes information on country of incorporation, whether consolidated financial statements are prepared, the accounting standards applied, and whether the firm is listed on an EU-regulated market. We use the database to provide some evidence on voluntary adoption of IFRS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲强制采用国际财务报告准则的偏差?为什么不收养不代表不遵守
Pownall和Wieczynska(2018)[欧盟强制采用国际财务报告准则的偏差:实施、执行、激励和合规性。]当代会计研究,35(2),1029-1066]表明,2005-2012年,欧洲上市公司普遍不采用国际财务报告准则(IFRS)。他们还表示,这种不收养的行为在很大程度上是非法的。这将构成欧洲公司、审计机构和监管机构的严重失败。然而,在本说明中,我们表明,在包括2012年和2020年在内的各个年份,德国和英国没有不遵守使用国际财务报告准则的强制性要求。在奥地利和葡萄牙,我们也没有发现不遵守规定的情况,这两个国家的执法程度较低。合法不收养的原因因国家和年份而异。我们的分析是基于手工收集的数据,它证明了Worldscope数据库在各个领域都存在许多错误。因此,我们为研究人员提供了一个手工收集的德国和英国公司2005-2020年期间的数据库,可以用来补充Worldscope。该数据库包括公司所在国、是否编制合并财务报表、采用的会计标准以及公司是否在欧盟管制的市场上上市等信息。我们使用该数据库为自愿采用国际财务报告准则提供一些证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Accounting Review
European Accounting Review BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Devoted to the advancement of accounting knowledge, it provides a forum for the publication of high quality accounting research manuscripts. The journal acknowledges its European origins and the distinctive variety of the European accounting research community. Conscious of these origins, European Accounting Review emphasises openness and flexibility, not only regarding the substantive issues of accounting research, but also with respect to paradigms, methodologies and styles of conducting that research. Though European Accounting Review is a truly international journal, it also holds a unique position as it is the only accounting journal to provide a European forum for the reporting of accounting research.
期刊最新文献
Tax Employee Careers and Corporate Tax Outcomes* Relational Work and Accounting: What Venture Capital Analysts Do with Accounting and Other Information in Situations of Uncertainty Regional Social Capital and Non-GAAP Earnings Disclosure Moving beyond Beyond Budgeting: A Case Study of the Dynamic Interrelationships between Budgets and Forecasts Climate Disasters and Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts: Evidence from the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1