A79 PA-rticipating in Simulation: Developing a novel teaching programme mapped to the physician associate curriculum, using simulation and interactive workshops to cover core conditions and non-technical skills

Emma Higgie, Hannah Parker, Natalia Zucca
{"title":"A79 PA-rticipating in Simulation: Developing a novel teaching programme mapped to the physician associate curriculum, using simulation and interactive workshops to cover core conditions and non-technical skills","authors":"Emma Higgie, Hannah Parker, Natalia Zucca","doi":"10.54531/pesj4909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physician Associates (PAs) are an increasingly prevalent member of the medical team, with approximately 3000 working within UK health organizations [1]. The role offers continuity and stability to the multi-disciplinary team, addressing the issue of foundation doctors rotating 4-monthly and the impact of this on day-to-day ward work, speciality specific skills and knowledge. Due to their disparate, and sometimes non-medical, backgrounds, qualified PAs have varied exposure to the recognition and management of specific medical emergencies. They also have limited opportunity for simulation experience during their training. At present, there is no national PA teaching programme once qualified (as a Foundation doctor would have), yet PAs are still expected to continue their personal and professional development, in addition to completing a re-certification exam to remain registered. We developed an innovative PA teaching programme, combining simulation scenarios with interactive workshops, with all sessions linked to the PA Competence and Curriculum Framework [2], mirroring the set-up of the Foundation doctor teaching programme. Each session aimed to develop knowledge and confidence, whilst also offering opportunities to develop non-technical skills such as teamwork, communication, handover and breaking bad news. Simulation sessions focused on assessment and management of a simulated patient with an acute medical problem whereas workshops allowed case discussion of topics such as endocrine emergencies, resuscitation decisions and dementia & delirium. Written feedback and Likert scales were used to evaluate the sessions. To date, 7 sessions have been run, with average attendance of 8.5 PAs of the 12 PAs working within the Trust. 100% of attendees agreed the scenarios have been useful and provided more confidence to deal with conditions covered. Written feedback praised the ‘transferable nature’ of topics discussed, relevant to PAs working across multiple secondary care specialties. Introducing this educational programme has been beneficial for the PAs. PAs within our trust have noted the benefits to their practice, allowing them to develop improved clinical assessment skills alongside widening their knowledge base outside of their current specialty. This supports personal and professional development, as well as providing exposure to multiple secondary care settings. We aim to repeat the same simulation scenarios after 4 months to evaluate if knowledge has been retained by adding an extra level of complexity when the scenarios are repeated. We will also look to share our learning and scenarios with other local trusts, with the potential to create a regional PA teaching programme within the South West. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.","PeriodicalId":93766,"journal":{"name":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","volume":"2000 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/pesj4909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physician Associates (PAs) are an increasingly prevalent member of the medical team, with approximately 3000 working within UK health organizations [1]. The role offers continuity and stability to the multi-disciplinary team, addressing the issue of foundation doctors rotating 4-monthly and the impact of this on day-to-day ward work, speciality specific skills and knowledge. Due to their disparate, and sometimes non-medical, backgrounds, qualified PAs have varied exposure to the recognition and management of specific medical emergencies. They also have limited opportunity for simulation experience during their training. At present, there is no national PA teaching programme once qualified (as a Foundation doctor would have), yet PAs are still expected to continue their personal and professional development, in addition to completing a re-certification exam to remain registered. We developed an innovative PA teaching programme, combining simulation scenarios with interactive workshops, with all sessions linked to the PA Competence and Curriculum Framework [2], mirroring the set-up of the Foundation doctor teaching programme. Each session aimed to develop knowledge and confidence, whilst also offering opportunities to develop non-technical skills such as teamwork, communication, handover and breaking bad news. Simulation sessions focused on assessment and management of a simulated patient with an acute medical problem whereas workshops allowed case discussion of topics such as endocrine emergencies, resuscitation decisions and dementia & delirium. Written feedback and Likert scales were used to evaluate the sessions. To date, 7 sessions have been run, with average attendance of 8.5 PAs of the 12 PAs working within the Trust. 100% of attendees agreed the scenarios have been useful and provided more confidence to deal with conditions covered. Written feedback praised the ‘transferable nature’ of topics discussed, relevant to PAs working across multiple secondary care specialties. Introducing this educational programme has been beneficial for the PAs. PAs within our trust have noted the benefits to their practice, allowing them to develop improved clinical assessment skills alongside widening their knowledge base outside of their current specialty. This supports personal and professional development, as well as providing exposure to multiple secondary care settings. We aim to repeat the same simulation scenarios after 4 months to evaluate if knowledge has been retained by adding an extra level of complexity when the scenarios are repeated. We will also look to share our learning and scenarios with other local trusts, with the potential to create a regional PA teaching programme within the South West. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A79 pa -参与模拟:开发一种新的教学方案映射到医师助理课程,使用模拟和互动研讨会来涵盖核心条件和非技术技能
医师助理(PAs)是医疗团队中越来越普遍的成员,在英国卫生组织中约有3000人[1]。该职位为多学科团队提供了连续性和稳定性,解决了基础医生每4个月轮换一次的问题,以及这对日常病房工作、专业特定技能和知识的影响。由于他们不同的背景,有时是非医学背景,合格的私人助理在识别和管理特定医疗紧急情况方面有不同的接触。在培训期间,他们的模拟体验机会也很有限。目前,一旦获得资格,就没有国家私人助理教学计划(就像基础医生一样),但私人助理仍然需要继续他们的个人和专业发展,除了完成重新认证考试以保持注册。我们开发了一个创新的PA教学计划,将模拟场景与互动研讨会相结合,所有课程都与PA能力和课程框架[2]相关联,反映了基础博士教学计划的设置。每节课都旨在培养知识和信心,同时也提供机会培养非技术技能,如团队合作、沟通、交接和披露坏消息。模拟会议侧重于评估和管理患有急性医疗问题的模拟患者,而讲习班则允许对诸如内分泌紧急情况、复苏决定和痴呆症等主题进行案例讨论;精神错乱。使用书面反馈和李克特量表对会话进行评估。到目前为止,已经进行了7次会议,在信托基金内工作的12名pa中,平均有8.5名pa出席。100%的与会者认为这些场景是有用的,并为处理所涵盖的条件提供了更大的信心。书面反馈赞扬了讨论主题的“可转移性”,与跨多个二级护理专业的PAs工作相关。引进这个教育方案对考察团是有益的。我们信托的PAs已经注意到他们的实践带来的好处,使他们能够发展改进的临床评估技能,同时扩大他们在当前专业之外的知识基础。这有助于个人和专业发展,并提供接触多个二级护理机构的机会。我们的目标是在4个月后重复相同的模拟场景,通过在场景重复时增加额外的复杂性来评估是否保留了知识。我们还将寻求与其他当地信托机构分享我们的学习和场景,有可能在西南地区创建区域PA教学计划。作者确认已符合研究行为和传播的所有相关伦理标准。提交作者确认已获得相关的伦理批准(如适用)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A pilot study comparing immersive virtual reality simulation and computerized virtual patient simulation in undergraduate medical education Use of prebriefing in simulation-based experience for nursing education: a scoping review Cross-discipline teaching and learning of cardiology through an augmented reality application The effectiveness and efficiency of using ChatGPT for writing health care simulations A75 Strengthening simulation quality assurance through the ‘Sim QA bundle’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1