It is a Gurdwara, Not a Memorial .”: The Politics and Aesthetics of Sikh Memorials for 1984

IF 0.5 0 ASIAN STUDIES South Asian Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1080/02666030.2023.2270839
Kanika Singh
{"title":"“ <i>It is a Gurdwara, Not a Memorial</i> .”: The Politics and Aesthetics of Sikh Memorials for 1984","authors":"Kanika Singh","doi":"10.1080/02666030.2023.2270839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis paper looks at two memorials built in India to commemorate Sikh victims of the violent events of June 1984 and November 1984. Gurdwara Yaadgaar Shaheedan (Gurdwara Martyrs’ Memorial) was built in the Golden Temple complex, Amritsar in 2013, and the Wall of Truth: Sikh Genocide Memorial was inaugurated in Gurdwara Rakabganj, New Delhi in 2017. While both memorials commemorate related events and are built by the same group of people, they differ completely in the choice of nomenclature, design and even the justification given for their creation. This paper discusses the differences between these memorials and their relevance in the memorial politics of contemporary India.Keywords: Sikhmuseummemorial1984Operation Bluestarmemorials for atrocitiesHolocaust AcknowledgementI am grateful to Manjit Singh GK for discussing his work with me. I also thank the anonymous reviewers for their detailed comments on the paper.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. From the word, panth, for the Sikh community.2. This alliance broke in the year 2020 in the context of the historic Farmers’ Protests led by the farmers of Punjab, against the BJP-led Central Government’s introduction of three farm laws.3. For this paper, I consider museums and memorials together, keeping in mind the commemorative function of museums. In the Sikh case, museums are often both sites for acquiring knowledge of the past and also to remember a particular aspect of Sikh history. For example, the information panel at the Bhai Mati Das Museum in Gurdwara Sisganj, Delhi informs the visitor that it is built on the ‘land enriched by the blood of martyrs’ and the museum is for the younger generations to remember these sacrifices.4. Kanika Singh, ‘Understanding Sikh Museums in Contemporary India’, Economic & Political Weekly 57, no. 15, (April 2022): 32–39.5. See, for instance, Yogesh Snehi, ‘Narratives of History’, The Tribune, 5 August 2012, https://www.tribuneindia.com/2012/20120805/spectrum/main4.htm; Kanchan Vasudev et al., ‘Punjab Elections 2017: CM Parkash Singh Badal Spends Generously on War Memorials and Monuments’, The Indian Express, 18 July 2016, https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/punjab-elections-2017-cm-parkash-singh-badal-spends-on-monuments-memorials-unlimited-hardlook-2920540/.6. Singh, Understanding Sikh, p. 36.7. It should be noted that the two Partition Museums mentioned here are not ‘Sikh’ projects. Their sponsorship is not exclusively Sikh nor is their thematic focus on the Sikh community alone. Along with the Virasat-e Khalsa, they are the first examples and the only recent examples of museumization of the Partition, an event which is extremely significant in the history of South Asia.8. The Golden Temple is also referred to by other names such as the Darbar Sahib and the Harmandir Sahib.9. Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale (1947–84) was the head of the Damdami Taksal (a radical Sikh seminary), and he gained popularity as a religious preacher in the mid-late 1970s. Bhindranwale came to be associated with militant activities including attacks on Hindus and political critics. He directed his rhetoric at the ‘Hindu’ government led by Indira Gandhi, the then Prime Minister of India and the leader of the Congress party. Believed to have been initially propped up by the Congress to sideline the Akalis, Bhindranwale soon became too hot to handle, leading to the army attack on the Golden Temple.10. For more on Operation Bluestar, see Mark Tully and Satish Jacob, Amritsar: Mrs Gandhi’s Last Battle (New Delhi: Rupa, 2006).11. See Radhika Chopra, ‘Commemorating Hurt: Memorializing Operation Bluestar’, Sikh Formations: Religion, Culture, Theory 6, no. 2 (2010): 119–52.; Radhika Chopra, ‘A Museum, A Memorial, And A Martyr’, Sikh Formations: Religion, Culture, Theory 9, no. 2 (2013): 97–114.; Radhika Chopra, Amritsar 1984: A City Remembers (London: Lexington, 2018).; Giorgio Shani, ‘The Memorialization of Ghallughara: Trauma, Nation and Diaspora’, Sikh Formations: Religion, Culture, Theory 6, no. 20 (2010): 177–92.; Darshan S. Tatla, ‘The Morning After: Trauma, Memory and the Sikh Predicament since 1984’, Sikh Formations: Religion, Culture, Theory, 2, no. (2006): 57–88.12. According to Manjit Singh GK, former President of DSGMC, this number is about 5000 in Delhi and 12000 in India. Interview with author, 9 October 2021.13. See Uma Chakravarti and Nandita Haksar, The Delhi Riots: Three Days in the Life of A Nation (New Delhi: Lancer International, 1987).; Amiya Rao, Aurobindo Ghosh and N.D. Pancholi, Report to the Nation: Truth About Delhi Violence (New Delhi: Citizens For Democracy, 1985).; Manoj Mitta and H.S. Phoolka, When A Tree Shook Delhi: The 1984 Carnage and Its Aftermath (New Delhi: Roli Books, 2007). Manmohan Singh, a leader of the Congress and himself as Sikh, apologized to the Sikh community and to the nation in 2005 when he was the Prime Minister of India. Justice, however, still eludes the victims.14. Chopra, Commemorating Hurt.15. Pritam Singh and Navtej K. Purewal, ‘The Resurgence of Bhindranwale’s Image in Contemporary Punjab’, Contemporary South Asia 21, no. 2 (2013): 133–47.16. See, Ravleen Kaur, ‘The Trauma of 1984 Didn’t Die With Its Victims, It Continues to Live Through Its Survivors’, Youth ki Awaz, 2 November 2015, https://www.youthkiawaaz.com/2015/11/1984-anti-sikh-massacre-31st-anniversary/; Shruti Devgan, ‘The Digital Story of 1984: Diasporic Sikhs and the Mediated Work of Memory and Emotion’, Journal of Punjab Studies 22, no. 2, (2015): 343–378.17. Michael Nijhawan, ‘1984 and the Diasporic Politics of Aesthetics: Reconfigurations and New Constellations Among Toronto’s Sikh Youth’, Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies 17, no. 2 (Summer 2008): 196–219.18. Chopra, Amritsar 1984, pp. xix–xxiii.19. ‘Ruckus in Punjab Assembly’, Outlook, 21 June 2012. See Chopra, A Museum, A Memorial, on the dilemmas of remembering Bhindranwale and the significance of this statement.20. ‘Op Bluestar Memorial: Basic Structure Built in First Phase’, The Tribune, 23 July 2012.21. ‘I’m a Soldier, Won’t Let Go Easily: Lt. Gen Brar.’ The Tribune, 3 October 2012.22. ‘Amarinder Questions Badal’s Silence’, The Tribune, 4 October 2012.; ‘I’m a Soldier, Won’t Let Go Easily: Lt. Gen Brar’, The Tribune, 3 October 2012.23. Gen. Vaidya was the Indian army chief leading Operation Bluestar. He was assassinated in 1986 by two Sikhs, to avenge the attack on the Golden Temple. ‘SGPC Honours Gen.Vaidya Assassins, Stirring up Controversy’, The Hindu, 10 October 2012.24. ‘Memorial Has No Link With Attack On Brar, Says SGPC. Work On Bluestar Memorial Complex In Full Swing’, The Tribune, 6 October 2012.25. ‘General Brar Not Aware Of Ground Reality: Badal’, The Tribune, 12 October 2012.; ‘State Not To Blame For Attack On Brar: Sukhbir’, The Tribune. 6 October 2012.26. SGPC secretary as quoted in news report ‘Rethink Bluestar Memorial: Shinde,’ The Tribune, 8 October 2012.27. ‘Sukhbir Badal Defends Bluestar Memorial’, The Tribune, 12 October 2012.28. ‘Dangerous Memorial Politics in Punjab,’ NDTV, 11 October 2012. Accessed 23 February 2021. https://www.ndtv.com/video/news/left-right-centre/dangerous-memorial-politics-in-punjab-250328.29. ‘Rethink Bluestar Memorial: Shinde’, The Tribune, 8 October 2012.30. ‘Badal Meets PM, Says Memorial Like Any Other Gurdwara’, The Tribune, 30 October 2012.31. ‘Op Bluestar Memorial Dedicated To The Community’, The Tribune, 28 April 2013.32. Translation by author.33. This is the original English text on the information panel at the memorial.34. ‘DSGMC May Raise Memorial To Riot Victims’, The Tribune, 25 June 2012.35. ‘SAD (Badal) Protests Delay In Naming ‘1984 Memorial Park’’, The Tribune, 11 November 2012.36. ‘Akali Dal Hits Back At Delhi Govt Over ‘Bid To Stall’ 1984 Memorial’, The Tribune, 12 November 2012.37. ‘Sarna, Badal Groups Target Each Other As Poll Campaign Picks Up,’ The Tribune, 14 January 2013.; ‘Tight Fight for DSGMC’, The Tribune, 24 January 2013.; ‘Punjab Acrimony Resonates In Delhi’, The Tribune, 25 January 2013.38. ‘How Sukhbir Won the Day for SAD’, The Tribune, 31 January 2013.39. ‘Confining Sarna to Punjabi Bagh Did It’, The Tribune, 31 January 2013.40. ‘Memorial for the Riot Hit in Rakabganj Sahib’, The Tribune, 23 May 2013.41. Manjit Singh GK. Interview with author. 9 October 2021.42. ‘Memorial to ’84 Riots Victims Soon’, The Tribune, 3 June 2013.43. ‘Delhi Court Acquits Sajjan Kumar, convicts 5 others’, The Economic Times, 1 May 2013.44. ‘Sarna Opposes Memorial Inside Delhi Gurdwara’, The Tribune, 7 June 2013.45. ‘Sarna Opposes Memorial Inside Delhi Gurdwara’, The Tribune, 7 June 2013.; ‘Sarna: Will Back Memorial Outside Rakabganj Sahib’, The Tribune, 10 June 2013.46. ‘Takht Chiefs to Lay Stone of 1984 Memorial Tomorrow’, The Tribune, 11 June 2013.47. ‘1984 riots is ‘fourth holocaust’ of Sikhs: Badal’, Hindustan Times, 2 November 2014. He was referring to the Sikh conflict with the Afghans and the Mughals in the 18th century, referred to as the Wadda Ghallughara and the Chhota Ghallughara, as the first two holocausts, and the third being Operation Bluestar.48. ‘Memorial Dedicated to ’84 Riot Victims to Come Up In Delhi’, The Tribune. 6 June 2013.49. ‘Takht Chiefs to Lay Stone of 1984 Memorial Tomorrow’, The Tribune, 11 June 2013.50. Manjit Singh GK. Interview with author. 9 October 2021.51. Manjit Singh GK. Speech at the inauguration of the Wall of Truth memorial, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1ANs0hZkwc (accessed on 22 January 2022). The original is in Punjabi. Translation by author.52. Manjit Singh GK. Interview with author. 9 October 2021.53. Manjit Singh GK. Interview with author. 9 October 2021.54. Also see Chopra’s argument that the memorial’s form as a gurdwara is significant because it has the potential to upstage Darbar Sahib as the primary site of Sikh memory (2013).55. When BJP formed the government at the centre in 2014 and 2019, SAD held a ministry each time.56. ‘No Revival of Militancy in Punjab: Shinde. Says Union Government Cannot Interfere in Matters of Sikh Gurdwara Panel’, The Tribune, 11 October 2012.57. Members of the radical Hindu groups and BJP supported the attack on the Sikhs (both of June and November 1984) and are known to have participated in the November attacks. This must be understood in light of extreme communal polarisation between Hindus and Sikhs at that time. The Congress-led violence appealed to Hindu majoritarian sentiments and got support from right-wing Hindu organisations. The BJP’s desire to participate in ’84 memorial activities in Delhi comes later, in an attempt to gain off the Congress, and also to counter Congress’s criticism of 2002 Gujarat violence against the Muslims which was supported by the BJP government of the state. See Shiv Inder Singh, ‘The BJP’s and the Sangh’s Sikh Appeasement is Electoral Hypocrisy’, The Caravan, 9 July 2019. https://caravanmagazine.in/politics/rss-bjp-sangh-sikh-appeasement-1984.; Ajaz Ashraf, ‘RSS was Silent During the 1984 Riots. At Places, It was Implicated in Violence’, The Scroll, 3 November 2015. https://scroll.in/article/766550/rss-was-silent-during-the-1984-riots-at-places-it-was-implicated-in-the-violence.58. Manjit Singh GK, Interview with author, 9 October 2021.59. This difference is also visible in the case of Sikh museums in Delhi and Punjab. The Central Sikh Museum in Amritsar includes the portraits of Bhindranwale and the assassins of Indira Gandhi in its display, while none of the Sikh museums in Delhi do so. These variations indirectly reveal the tensions within the community and the differences between what is perceived to be its history. This is because the Sikh community and its politics in Delhi differs from that in Punjab. In Delhi, the Khatris are most prominent Sikh groups controlling the gurdwaras, and were traditionally seen close to the Centre. Punjab politics and gurdwaras are controlled by Jatt Sikhs whose allegiances differ and are often at loggerheads with the Central Government in Delhi. Singh, Understanding Sikh, pp. 36–37.60. See, James E. Young, The Texture of Memory: Holocaust Memorials and Meaning (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993).; Paul Williams, Memorial Museums: The Global Rush to Commemorate Atrocities (Oxford & New York: Berg Publishers, 2007).; Amy Sodaro, Exhibiting Atrocity: Memorial Museums and the Politics of Past Violence (New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 2018).61. As claimed by Manjit Singh GK, Interview with author. 9 October 2021.62. ‘Sikh Katleaam: Shiromani Committee Pradhan Valon New Jersery di Senate de Faisle da Swagat’, [Sikh Massacre: Shiromani Committee Welcomes New Jersey Senate’s Decision]. Punjabi Tribune, 13 January 2022.63. ‘Rajnath Called 1984 killings ‘Genocide’, Now MEA Objects When Canada Does the Same’, The Wire, 7 April 2017. https://thewire.in/diplomacy/rajnath-called-1984-killings-genocide-now-mea-objects-canada.64. ‘84 Sikh Naslkushi: Amrica vic Yaadgaar Hatai’, [’84 Sikh Genocide: Memorial Removed in America], Punjabi Tribune, 21 October 2019.; ‘1984 Sikh Genocide Memorial in US Removed After India Protests’, The Tribune, 21 October 2019.","PeriodicalId":52006,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Studies","volume":"2020 26","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02666030.2023.2270839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThis paper looks at two memorials built in India to commemorate Sikh victims of the violent events of June 1984 and November 1984. Gurdwara Yaadgaar Shaheedan (Gurdwara Martyrs’ Memorial) was built in the Golden Temple complex, Amritsar in 2013, and the Wall of Truth: Sikh Genocide Memorial was inaugurated in Gurdwara Rakabganj, New Delhi in 2017. While both memorials commemorate related events and are built by the same group of people, they differ completely in the choice of nomenclature, design and even the justification given for their creation. This paper discusses the differences between these memorials and their relevance in the memorial politics of contemporary India.Keywords: Sikhmuseummemorial1984Operation Bluestarmemorials for atrocitiesHolocaust AcknowledgementI am grateful to Manjit Singh GK for discussing his work with me. I also thank the anonymous reviewers for their detailed comments on the paper.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. From the word, panth, for the Sikh community.2. This alliance broke in the year 2020 in the context of the historic Farmers’ Protests led by the farmers of Punjab, against the BJP-led Central Government’s introduction of three farm laws.3. For this paper, I consider museums and memorials together, keeping in mind the commemorative function of museums. In the Sikh case, museums are often both sites for acquiring knowledge of the past and also to remember a particular aspect of Sikh history. For example, the information panel at the Bhai Mati Das Museum in Gurdwara Sisganj, Delhi informs the visitor that it is built on the ‘land enriched by the blood of martyrs’ and the museum is for the younger generations to remember these sacrifices.4. Kanika Singh, ‘Understanding Sikh Museums in Contemporary India’, Economic & Political Weekly 57, no. 15, (April 2022): 32–39.5. See, for instance, Yogesh Snehi, ‘Narratives of History’, The Tribune, 5 August 2012, https://www.tribuneindia.com/2012/20120805/spectrum/main4.htm; Kanchan Vasudev et al., ‘Punjab Elections 2017: CM Parkash Singh Badal Spends Generously on War Memorials and Monuments’, The Indian Express, 18 July 2016, https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/punjab-elections-2017-cm-parkash-singh-badal-spends-on-monuments-memorials-unlimited-hardlook-2920540/.6. Singh, Understanding Sikh, p. 36.7. It should be noted that the two Partition Museums mentioned here are not ‘Sikh’ projects. Their sponsorship is not exclusively Sikh nor is their thematic focus on the Sikh community alone. Along with the Virasat-e Khalsa, they are the first examples and the only recent examples of museumization of the Partition, an event which is extremely significant in the history of South Asia.8. The Golden Temple is also referred to by other names such as the Darbar Sahib and the Harmandir Sahib.9. Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale (1947–84) was the head of the Damdami Taksal (a radical Sikh seminary), and he gained popularity as a religious preacher in the mid-late 1970s. Bhindranwale came to be associated with militant activities including attacks on Hindus and political critics. He directed his rhetoric at the ‘Hindu’ government led by Indira Gandhi, the then Prime Minister of India and the leader of the Congress party. Believed to have been initially propped up by the Congress to sideline the Akalis, Bhindranwale soon became too hot to handle, leading to the army attack on the Golden Temple.10. For more on Operation Bluestar, see Mark Tully and Satish Jacob, Amritsar: Mrs Gandhi’s Last Battle (New Delhi: Rupa, 2006).11. See Radhika Chopra, ‘Commemorating Hurt: Memorializing Operation Bluestar’, Sikh Formations: Religion, Culture, Theory 6, no. 2 (2010): 119–52.; Radhika Chopra, ‘A Museum, A Memorial, And A Martyr’, Sikh Formations: Religion, Culture, Theory 9, no. 2 (2013): 97–114.; Radhika Chopra, Amritsar 1984: A City Remembers (London: Lexington, 2018).; Giorgio Shani, ‘The Memorialization of Ghallughara: Trauma, Nation and Diaspora’, Sikh Formations: Religion, Culture, Theory 6, no. 20 (2010): 177–92.; Darshan S. Tatla, ‘The Morning After: Trauma, Memory and the Sikh Predicament since 1984’, Sikh Formations: Religion, Culture, Theory, 2, no. (2006): 57–88.12. According to Manjit Singh GK, former President of DSGMC, this number is about 5000 in Delhi and 12000 in India. Interview with author, 9 October 2021.13. See Uma Chakravarti and Nandita Haksar, The Delhi Riots: Three Days in the Life of A Nation (New Delhi: Lancer International, 1987).; Amiya Rao, Aurobindo Ghosh and N.D. Pancholi, Report to the Nation: Truth About Delhi Violence (New Delhi: Citizens For Democracy, 1985).; Manoj Mitta and H.S. Phoolka, When A Tree Shook Delhi: The 1984 Carnage and Its Aftermath (New Delhi: Roli Books, 2007). Manmohan Singh, a leader of the Congress and himself as Sikh, apologized to the Sikh community and to the nation in 2005 when he was the Prime Minister of India. Justice, however, still eludes the victims.14. Chopra, Commemorating Hurt.15. Pritam Singh and Navtej K. Purewal, ‘The Resurgence of Bhindranwale’s Image in Contemporary Punjab’, Contemporary South Asia 21, no. 2 (2013): 133–47.16. See, Ravleen Kaur, ‘The Trauma of 1984 Didn’t Die With Its Victims, It Continues to Live Through Its Survivors’, Youth ki Awaz, 2 November 2015, https://www.youthkiawaaz.com/2015/11/1984-anti-sikh-massacre-31st-anniversary/; Shruti Devgan, ‘The Digital Story of 1984: Diasporic Sikhs and the Mediated Work of Memory and Emotion’, Journal of Punjab Studies 22, no. 2, (2015): 343–378.17. Michael Nijhawan, ‘1984 and the Diasporic Politics of Aesthetics: Reconfigurations and New Constellations Among Toronto’s Sikh Youth’, Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies 17, no. 2 (Summer 2008): 196–219.18. Chopra, Amritsar 1984, pp. xix–xxiii.19. ‘Ruckus in Punjab Assembly’, Outlook, 21 June 2012. See Chopra, A Museum, A Memorial, on the dilemmas of remembering Bhindranwale and the significance of this statement.20. ‘Op Bluestar Memorial: Basic Structure Built in First Phase’, The Tribune, 23 July 2012.21. ‘I’m a Soldier, Won’t Let Go Easily: Lt. Gen Brar.’ The Tribune, 3 October 2012.22. ‘Amarinder Questions Badal’s Silence’, The Tribune, 4 October 2012.; ‘I’m a Soldier, Won’t Let Go Easily: Lt. Gen Brar’, The Tribune, 3 October 2012.23. Gen. Vaidya was the Indian army chief leading Operation Bluestar. He was assassinated in 1986 by two Sikhs, to avenge the attack on the Golden Temple. ‘SGPC Honours Gen.Vaidya Assassins, Stirring up Controversy’, The Hindu, 10 October 2012.24. ‘Memorial Has No Link With Attack On Brar, Says SGPC. Work On Bluestar Memorial Complex In Full Swing’, The Tribune, 6 October 2012.25. ‘General Brar Not Aware Of Ground Reality: Badal’, The Tribune, 12 October 2012.; ‘State Not To Blame For Attack On Brar: Sukhbir’, The Tribune. 6 October 2012.26. SGPC secretary as quoted in news report ‘Rethink Bluestar Memorial: Shinde,’ The Tribune, 8 October 2012.27. ‘Sukhbir Badal Defends Bluestar Memorial’, The Tribune, 12 October 2012.28. ‘Dangerous Memorial Politics in Punjab,’ NDTV, 11 October 2012. Accessed 23 February 2021. https://www.ndtv.com/video/news/left-right-centre/dangerous-memorial-politics-in-punjab-250328.29. ‘Rethink Bluestar Memorial: Shinde’, The Tribune, 8 October 2012.30. ‘Badal Meets PM, Says Memorial Like Any Other Gurdwara’, The Tribune, 30 October 2012.31. ‘Op Bluestar Memorial Dedicated To The Community’, The Tribune, 28 April 2013.32. Translation by author.33. This is the original English text on the information panel at the memorial.34. ‘DSGMC May Raise Memorial To Riot Victims’, The Tribune, 25 June 2012.35. ‘SAD (Badal) Protests Delay In Naming ‘1984 Memorial Park’’, The Tribune, 11 November 2012.36. ‘Akali Dal Hits Back At Delhi Govt Over ‘Bid To Stall’ 1984 Memorial’, The Tribune, 12 November 2012.37. ‘Sarna, Badal Groups Target Each Other As Poll Campaign Picks Up,’ The Tribune, 14 January 2013.; ‘Tight Fight for DSGMC’, The Tribune, 24 January 2013.; ‘Punjab Acrimony Resonates In Delhi’, The Tribune, 25 January 2013.38. ‘How Sukhbir Won the Day for SAD’, The Tribune, 31 January 2013.39. ‘Confining Sarna to Punjabi Bagh Did It’, The Tribune, 31 January 2013.40. ‘Memorial for the Riot Hit in Rakabganj Sahib’, The Tribune, 23 May 2013.41. Manjit Singh GK. Interview with author. 9 October 2021.42. ‘Memorial to ’84 Riots Victims Soon’, The Tribune, 3 June 2013.43. ‘Delhi Court Acquits Sajjan Kumar, convicts 5 others’, The Economic Times, 1 May 2013.44. ‘Sarna Opposes Memorial Inside Delhi Gurdwara’, The Tribune, 7 June 2013.45. ‘Sarna Opposes Memorial Inside Delhi Gurdwara’, The Tribune, 7 June 2013.; ‘Sarna: Will Back Memorial Outside Rakabganj Sahib’, The Tribune, 10 June 2013.46. ‘Takht Chiefs to Lay Stone of 1984 Memorial Tomorrow’, The Tribune, 11 June 2013.47. ‘1984 riots is ‘fourth holocaust’ of Sikhs: Badal’, Hindustan Times, 2 November 2014. He was referring to the Sikh conflict with the Afghans and the Mughals in the 18th century, referred to as the Wadda Ghallughara and the Chhota Ghallughara, as the first two holocausts, and the third being Operation Bluestar.48. ‘Memorial Dedicated to ’84 Riot Victims to Come Up In Delhi’, The Tribune. 6 June 2013.49. ‘Takht Chiefs to Lay Stone of 1984 Memorial Tomorrow’, The Tribune, 11 June 2013.50. Manjit Singh GK. Interview with author. 9 October 2021.51. Manjit Singh GK. Speech at the inauguration of the Wall of Truth memorial, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1ANs0hZkwc (accessed on 22 January 2022). The original is in Punjabi. Translation by author.52. Manjit Singh GK. Interview with author. 9 October 2021.53. Manjit Singh GK. Interview with author. 9 October 2021.54. Also see Chopra’s argument that the memorial’s form as a gurdwara is significant because it has the potential to upstage Darbar Sahib as the primary site of Sikh memory (2013).55. When BJP formed the government at the centre in 2014 and 2019, SAD held a ministry each time.56. ‘No Revival of Militancy in Punjab: Shinde. Says Union Government Cannot Interfere in Matters of Sikh Gurdwara Panel’, The Tribune, 11 October 2012.57. Members of the radical Hindu groups and BJP supported the attack on the Sikhs (both of June and November 1984) and are known to have participated in the November attacks. This must be understood in light of extreme communal polarisation between Hindus and Sikhs at that time. The Congress-led violence appealed to Hindu majoritarian sentiments and got support from right-wing Hindu organisations. The BJP’s desire to participate in ’84 memorial activities in Delhi comes later, in an attempt to gain off the Congress, and also to counter Congress’s criticism of 2002 Gujarat violence against the Muslims which was supported by the BJP government of the state. See Shiv Inder Singh, ‘The BJP’s and the Sangh’s Sikh Appeasement is Electoral Hypocrisy’, The Caravan, 9 July 2019. https://caravanmagazine.in/politics/rss-bjp-sangh-sikh-appeasement-1984.; Ajaz Ashraf, ‘RSS was Silent During the 1984 Riots. At Places, It was Implicated in Violence’, The Scroll, 3 November 2015. https://scroll.in/article/766550/rss-was-silent-during-the-1984-riots-at-places-it-was-implicated-in-the-violence.58. Manjit Singh GK, Interview with author, 9 October 2021.59. This difference is also visible in the case of Sikh museums in Delhi and Punjab. The Central Sikh Museum in Amritsar includes the portraits of Bhindranwale and the assassins of Indira Gandhi in its display, while none of the Sikh museums in Delhi do so. These variations indirectly reveal the tensions within the community and the differences between what is perceived to be its history. This is because the Sikh community and its politics in Delhi differs from that in Punjab. In Delhi, the Khatris are most prominent Sikh groups controlling the gurdwaras, and were traditionally seen close to the Centre. Punjab politics and gurdwaras are controlled by Jatt Sikhs whose allegiances differ and are often at loggerheads with the Central Government in Delhi. Singh, Understanding Sikh, pp. 36–37.60. See, James E. Young, The Texture of Memory: Holocaust Memorials and Meaning (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993).; Paul Williams, Memorial Museums: The Global Rush to Commemorate Atrocities (Oxford & New York: Berg Publishers, 2007).; Amy Sodaro, Exhibiting Atrocity: Memorial Museums and the Politics of Past Violence (New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 2018).61. As claimed by Manjit Singh GK, Interview with author. 9 October 2021.62. ‘Sikh Katleaam: Shiromani Committee Pradhan Valon New Jersery di Senate de Faisle da Swagat’, [Sikh Massacre: Shiromani Committee Welcomes New Jersey Senate’s Decision]. Punjabi Tribune, 13 January 2022.63. ‘Rajnath Called 1984 killings ‘Genocide’, Now MEA Objects When Canada Does the Same’, The Wire, 7 April 2017. https://thewire.in/diplomacy/rajnath-called-1984-killings-genocide-now-mea-objects-canada.64. ‘84 Sikh Naslkushi: Amrica vic Yaadgaar Hatai’, [’84 Sikh Genocide: Memorial Removed in America], Punjabi Tribune, 21 October 2019.; ‘1984 Sikh Genocide Memorial in US Removed After India Protests’, The Tribune, 21 October 2019.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“这是一座古陀罗,不是一座纪念碑”:《1984年锡克教纪念碑的政治与美学》
然而,受害者仍然得不到正义。《纪念伤痛》,乔普拉。Pritam Singh和Navtej K. Purewal,“当代旁遮普省bhindanwale形象的复兴”,当代南亚21,第2期。2(2013): 133-47.16。参见,Ravleen Kaur,“1984年的创伤并没有随着受害者而消失,它通过幸存者继续存在”,Youth ki Awaz, 2015年11月2日,https://www.youthkiawaaz.com/2015/11/1984-anti-sikh-massacre-31st-anniversary/;《1984年的数字故事:散居的锡克教徒和记忆与情感的中介工作》,《旁遮普省研究杂志》22期,第2期。[2](2015): 343-378.17。Michael Nijhawan,“1984和美学的散居政治:多伦多锡克教青年中的重新配置和新星座”,《散居:跨国研究杂志》17,第17期。2 (Summer 2008): 196-219.18。乔普拉,阿姆利则1984年,第19 - 23页。《旁遮普省议会的骚动》,《展望》,2012年6月21日。参见Chopra, A Museum, A Memorial,关于记住bhindanwale的困境和这句话的意义。“Op蓝星纪念馆:第一期基本结构建设”,论坛报,2012年7月23日。“我是一名军人,不会轻易放手:布拉尔中将。”论坛报,2012年10月3日。《Amarinder质疑Badal的沉默》,论坛报,2012年10月4日;《我是一名军人,不会轻易放手:布拉尔中将》,《论坛报》,2012年10月3日。瓦迪亚将军是领导“蓝星行动”的印度陆军总司令。1986年,他被两名锡克教徒暗杀,以报复对金庙的袭击。“SGPC表彰vaidya将军刺客,引发争议”,印度教徒报,2012年10月10日。SGPC称,纪念与Brar袭击无关。“蓝星纪念馆建设全面展开”,《论坛报》2012年10月6日。《布拉尔将军没有意识到地面现实:巴达尔》,论坛报,2012年10月12日。“国家不应为袭击Brar: Sukhbir负责”,论坛报,2012年10月6日。《论坛报》2012年10月8日《重新思考蓝星纪念馆:辛德》新闻报道引述SGPC秘书的话。《苏赫比尔·巴达尔捍卫蓝星纪念馆》,论坛报,2012年10月12日。“旁遮普危险的纪念政治”,新德里电视台,2012年10月11日。2021年2月23日发布。https://www.ndtv.com/video/news/left -正确- centre/dangerous纪念碑旁遮普-政治-在- 250328.29。《重新思考蓝星纪念馆:辛德》,论坛报,2012年10月8日。“Badal会见总理,像其他gurdwarva一样表示纪念”,论坛报,2012年10月30日。《献给社区的蓝星纪念馆》,《论坛报》2013年4月28日。由作者翻译。这是纪念馆信息板上的英文原文。“DSGMC可能为暴乱受害者设立纪念碑”,论坛报,2012年6月25日。“SAD (Badal)抗议推迟命名1984纪念公园”,论坛报,2012年11月11日。《阿卡利·达尔反击德里政府试图拖延1984年纪念》,论坛报,2012年11月12日。《萨尔纳、巴达尔两大阵营在民意调查中互相攻击》,《论坛报》,2013年1月14日;《为DSGMC而战》,论坛报,2013年1月24日;“旁遮普的尖刻在德里引起共鸣”,论坛报,2013.38年1月25日。“Sukhbir如何赢得SAD的一天”,论坛报,2013.39年1月31日。“把萨尔纳关在旁遮普Bagh做到了”,论坛报,2013.40年1月31日。《纪念Rakabganj Sahib暴乱》,《论坛报》,2013.41年5月23日。Manjit Singh GK。采访作者。2021.42年10月9日。《纪念“即将到来的84年骚乱遇难者”》,《论坛报》,2013年6月3日。“德里法院无罪释放Sajjan Kumar,定罪其他5人”,经济时报,2013.44年5月1日。“Sarna反对德里Gurdwara内部的纪念碑”,论坛报,2013.45年6月7日。《Sarna反对德里Gurdwara内的纪念碑》,论坛报,2013年6月7日;《Sarna: Will Back Memorial Outside Rakabganj Sahib》,论坛报,2013.46年6月10日。《明日纪念1984年塔赫特酋长奠基》,《论坛报》,2013年6月11日。1984年的骚乱是锡克教徒的“第四次大屠杀”:Badal,《印度斯坦时报》,2014年11月2日。他指的是18世纪锡克教徒与阿富汗人和莫卧儿人的冲突,即被称为瓦达·加卢格拉和乔塔·加卢格拉的前两次大屠杀,第三次是蓝星行动。《纪念84年德里骚乱受害者》,《论坛报》,2013年6月6日。《明日纪念1984年塔赫特酋长奠基》,《论坛报》,2013.50年6月11日。Manjit Singh GK。采访作者。20121.51年10月9日。Manjit Singh GK。在真理之墙纪念碑落成典礼上的讲话,https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1ANs0hZkwc(于2022年1月22日访问)。原文是旁遮普语。作者翻译。Manjit Singh GK。采访作者。2021.53年10月9日。Manjit Singh GK。采访作者。2021.54年10月9日。也请参阅Chopra的论点,即纪念碑作为gurdwarwa的形式是重要的,因为它有可能抢了Darbar Sahib作为锡克教记忆主要地点的地位(2013)。 当人民党于2014年和2019年在中央组建政府时,社民党每次都担任一个部长。旁遮普没有武装复兴:辛德。称联邦政府不能干涉锡克教Gurdwara小组的事务,论坛报,2012年10月11日。激进的印度教团体和印度人民党成员支持对锡克教徒的袭击(1984年6月和11月),并参与了11月的袭击。这一点必须考虑到当时印度教徒和锡克教徒之间的极端社区两极分化。国大党领导的暴力迎合了印度教多数派的情绪,并得到了右翼印度教组织的支持。印度人民党希望参加在德里举行的84年纪念活动,是为了争取国大党的支持,也是为了反击国大党对2002年古吉拉特邦针对穆斯林的暴力行为的批评,这一批评得到了该邦人民党政府的支持。参见Shiv Inder Singh,“人民党和国大党的锡克教绥靖政策是选举的虚伪”,《大篷车》,2019年7月9日。https://caravanmagazine.in/politics/rss人民党-协会-锡克教绥靖政策- 1984。阿贾兹·阿什拉夫:1984年骚乱期间,RSS保持沉默。在一些地方,它与暴力有关”,《书卷》,2015年11月3日。https://scroll.in/article/766550/rss——是——沉默- - - 1984年骚乱- -地方-它是涉及——————violence.58。Manjit Singh GK,采访作者,2021.59年10月9日。这种差异在德里和旁遮普的锡克教博物馆中也很明显。阿姆利则(Amritsar)的中央锡克教博物馆(Central Sikh Museum)展出了bhinderanwale和刺杀英迪拉·甘地(Indira Gandhi)的刺客的肖像,而德里的锡克教博物馆都没有这样做。这些变化间接地揭示了社区内部的紧张局势以及人们对其历史的看法之间的差异。这是因为德里的锡克教社区及其政治与旁遮普不同。在德里,喀特里斯是最重要的锡克教团体,控制着gurdwarse,传统上被视为接近中央。旁遮普邦的政治和gurdwardevi都是由贾特锡克教徒控制的,他们的忠诚不同,经常与德里的中央政府发生争执。辛格,《理解锡克教》,第36-37.60页。参见詹姆斯·e·杨,《记忆的质感:大屠杀纪念馆及其意义》(纽黑文:耶鲁大学出版社,1993年)。保罗·威廉姆斯,《纪念博物馆:纪念暴行的全球热潮》(牛津和纽约:伯格出版社,2007年);艾米·索达罗,《展示暴行:纪念博物馆和过去暴力的政治》(新泽西:罗格斯大学出版社,2018),第61页。正如Manjit Singh GK对作者的采访所说。2021.62年10月9日。'锡克教徒Katleaam: Shiromani委员会Pradhan Valon New Jersery di Senate de Faisle da Swagat ',[锡克教徒大屠杀:Shiromani委员会欢迎新泽西州参议院的决定]。《旁遮普论坛报》,1963年1月13日。《拉杰纳特称1984年的杀戮为“种族灭绝”,现在加拿大也这么做了,MEA反对》,the Wire, 2017年4月7日。https://thewire.in/diplomacy/rajnath——叫——1984 -杀戮灭绝canada.64——现在——意味着对象。《1984年锡克教徒Naslkushi:美国受害者Yaadgaar Hatai》,《1984年锡克教徒大屠杀:美国拆除纪念碑》,《旁遮普论坛报》,2019年10月21日;《1984年锡克教徒大屠杀纪念碑在印度抗议后被拆除》,《论坛报》,2019年10月21日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South Asian Studies
South Asian Studies ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Were the Cretulae (Clay Sealings) from the Indus Port Town of Lothal Part of an Administrative Archive? Contextual, Interpretive, and Comparative Evidence Mudgagiri, a Pāla “Jayaskandhāvāra”: An Assessment of Recent Sculptural and Inscriptional Findings at Munger, Bihar Bamiyan Comes to Bangkok: Situating the Buddha of the Cave Museum at Wat Saket Why Ananda Coomaraswamy’s Time in Sri Lanka (Still) Matters Aesthetic of Light and Time: An Intellectual History of Pictorialism from India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1