The different shades of co-working spaces: how culture change explains the market rules

IF 1.2 4区 管理学 Q4 MANAGEMENT Culture and Organization Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI:10.1080/14759551.2023.2258430
Aristides I. Ferreira, Nádia Pereira, Henrique Duarte
{"title":"The different shades of co-working spaces: how culture change explains the market rules","authors":"Aristides I. Ferreira, Nádia Pereira, Henrique Duarte","doi":"10.1080/14759551.2023.2258430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis study aims to contribute to the existing literature by providing a deeper understanding of the links between the multiple layers in organizational culture and the different Co-working characteristics. The research presented here develops a new taxonomy of Co-working spaces by integrating results from qualitative semi-structured interviews supported by previous theoretical and empirical research. We conducted interviews with 44 owners or founders of co-working spaces. A thematic analysis revealed three different approaches to co-working, namely a profit-oriented perspective, a community-oriented perspective and a hybrid pattern that combines both perspectives. Drawing upon the interaction models, our findings contribute to a better understanding of different Co-working cultures in an increasingly competitive market. Accordingly, future research should validate the proposed model with complimentary methodologies (e.g. questionnaires) and longitudinal designs to track how Co-working culture persists or changes over time.KEYWORDS: Co-workingcommunity-orientedorganizational cultureprofit-orientedqualitative Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research was supported in part by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [grant UIDB/00315/2020].","PeriodicalId":10824,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Organization","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2023.2258430","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis study aims to contribute to the existing literature by providing a deeper understanding of the links between the multiple layers in organizational culture and the different Co-working characteristics. The research presented here develops a new taxonomy of Co-working spaces by integrating results from qualitative semi-structured interviews supported by previous theoretical and empirical research. We conducted interviews with 44 owners or founders of co-working spaces. A thematic analysis revealed three different approaches to co-working, namely a profit-oriented perspective, a community-oriented perspective and a hybrid pattern that combines both perspectives. Drawing upon the interaction models, our findings contribute to a better understanding of different Co-working cultures in an increasingly competitive market. Accordingly, future research should validate the proposed model with complimentary methodologies (e.g. questionnaires) and longitudinal designs to track how Co-working culture persists or changes over time.KEYWORDS: Co-workingcommunity-orientedorganizational cultureprofit-orientedqualitative Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research was supported in part by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [grant UIDB/00315/2020].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合办公空间的不同色调:文化变化如何解释市场规则
摘要本研究旨在通过对组织文化的多个层面与不同的联合工作特征之间的联系提供更深入的理解,从而对现有文献做出贡献。本文提出的研究通过整合以往理论和实证研究支持的定性半结构化访谈的结果,开发了一种新的联合办公空间分类方法。我们采访了44位联合办公空间的所有者或创始人。一项专题分析揭示了三种不同的联合办公方式,即以利润为导向的观点、以社区为导向的观点和结合两种观点的混合模式。借鉴这些互动模型,我们的发现有助于在竞争日益激烈的市场中更好地理解不同的联合办公文化。因此,未来的研究应该通过补充方法(如问卷调查)和纵向设计来验证所提出的模型,以跟踪联合办公文化如何随着时间的推移而持续或变化。关键词:合作工作;社区导向;组织文化;本研究得到了 技术与发展基金会[grant UIDB/00315/2020]的部分支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Culture and Organization was founded in 1995 as Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies . It represents the intersection of academic disciplines that have developed distinct qualitative, empirical and theoretical vocabularies to research organization, culture and related social phenomena. Culture and Organization features refereed articles that offer innovative insights and provoke discussion. It particularly offers papers which employ ethnographic, critical and interpretive approaches, as practised in such disciplines as organizational, communication, media and cultural studies, which go beyond description and use data to advance theoretical reflection. The Journal also presents papers which advance our conceptual understanding of organizational phenomena. Culture and Organization features refereed articles that offer innovative insights and provoke discussion. It particularly offers papers which employ ethnographic, critical and interpretive approaches, as practised in such disciplines as communication, media and cultural studies, which go beyond description and use data to advance theoretical reflection. The journal also presents papers which advance our conceptual understand-ing of organizational phenomena.
期刊最新文献
Speaking as the Other: A polyvocal account of precarity and performativity Pieces of me, letters from us: collage-making as embodied reflection in autoethnography True encounters with the fictional university: collectively rewriting the script of filmic dark academia from the academic margins A break room as spatial and material order for interaction In choppy waters with a critical friend: the benefits of intimate reflexive encounters in participatory action research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1