‘Bigger than football’: racist talk on and off the soccer pitch

IF 1 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Soccer & Society Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI:10.1080/14660970.2023.2250660
Jan Chovanec
{"title":"‘Bigger than football’: racist talk on and off the soccer pitch","authors":"Jan Chovanec","doi":"10.1080/14660970.2023.2250660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTRacism is a major social and cultural problem that has, in various forms, plagued football for a long time. Despite the attempts of official bodies to root it out, racist talk and behaviour are still rife among players as well as in fan communities. The present paper provides a case study of online users’ comments on the media coverage of a series of controversial incidents during a recent UEFA Europa League matchinvolving an alleged verbal act of racial abuse between two players. Adopting a discourse analytical perspective, the paper contrasts how the match controversies were reflected in the users’ public online discourses in two different cultural communities, namely the UK and the Czech Republic, and identifies some of the similarities and differences between the two. The analysis shows how the users reframe the underlying racist issue, trivialize it through humour and relativize its seriousness. The data indicate that such discourses surrounding football are important for understanding how fans construct various group identities and how specific socio-cultural contexts influence the perception of race-related controversies . Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. The Rangers coach Steven Gerrard used this phrase when talking about the key incident during his press conference on 18 March 2021: “You could say it’s been a test. I’ve tried to handle the situation in the best way I can but one thing that’s non-negotiable for me is the support for my players. I said last night that some things happen along your way as a player, a coach or a manager that aren’t really football related; they’re bigger than football or a different issue from football”. (Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfkc9NfIoys, time 8.22)2. Schmid, “The Definition of Racism”; Weaver, “Liquid Racism and the Ambiguity of Ali G”.3. van Dijk, “Racist Discourse”.4. Back et al., “Racism in Football”, 77.5. Gavins and Simpson, “Regina v John Terry”.6. Wolfers et al., “Just Because He’s Black”; Wolfers, “Self-directed Racialized Humor”.7. Back et al., “Racism in Football”, 77.8. Or, what Johansson (“Everyday Opinions in News Discussion Forums”) refers to as “everyday opinion” or “public vernacular discourse”.9. See Wrench and Garrett, “Constructions of ‘Whiteness’”; Kroon, “Recontextualizing Racism and Segregation”.10. See, for instance, Cleland, “Racism, Football Fans, and Online Message Boards”.11. Scholarly interest in online newspaper reader comments boards typically adopts a CDA perspective and concentrates on a single set of data (e.g. British) in order to identify racist themes and discourses (cf. Rowe and Goodman (“A Stinking Filthy Race of People”), Santana (“Virtuous or Vitriolic”), Harlow (“Story-chatterers Stirring Up Hate”), Catalano and Fielder (“European Spaces and the Roma”), Chovanec (“Irony as Counter Positioning”); and similar studies on social media data, e.g. Breazu and Machin (“Racism Toward the Roma”) for comments on Romanian Facebook). An example of a contrastive approach using comparable datasets from two different languages/cultures includes Chovanec, (“Re-educating the Roma?”) on anti-Roma racism in British and Czech discussion forums, and Weizman and Fetzer (“The Discursive Construction of Accountability”) on Israeli and British discourse.12. Gavins and Simpson (“Regina v John Terry”) describe several such cases from the English league, as well as the subsequent legal proceedings concerning the 2011 incident between John Terry and Anton Ferdinand.13. See, for instance: https://www.sportbible.com/football/football-news-horrific-photo-of-keepers-injuries-emerge-after-kemar-roofe-head-kick-20210318. Accessed on January 14, 2022.14. UEFA’s decision was appealed by the Rangers, but the appeal was dismissed by UEFA’s decision of 10 May 2021, which cited “dangerously assaulting another player” as the reason for the four-match suspension (Source: “AB: Rangers FC v SK Slavia Praha”, Last updated May 10, 2021, 18:30, https://www.uefa.com/updates/)15. When describing the incident later on, Kolář stated: “If you ever kicked a ball, you know that a foot can always be pulled back. He said that he was the first at the ball. But he did not add that he kicked it out of my hand, straightened his leg and hit me in the head. All the time he could see me. I waited for Roofe to maybe message me on Instagram but instead I was reading hateful messages from Rangers fans” (“Kdo někdy kopal do míče, ví, že noha se vždycky dá stáhnout. Řekl, že byl u balonu první. Ale už nedodal, že mi ho vykopl z ruky, propnul nohu a trefil mi hlavu. Celou dobu mě viděl. Čekal jsem, jestli mi třeba Roofe nenapíše na Instagramu, místo toho jsem si četl nenávistné vzkazy od fanoušků Rangers”). (Source: https://www.ruik.cz/kolar-poprve-o-zraneni-nechteli-me-pustit-z-kabiny-roofe-se-neomluvil-proti-sparte-mi-bylo-zle/, published on April 14, 2021.)16. Jason Cundy and Andy Goldstein on Sports Bar (Source: https://talksport.com/football/851905/rangers-kemar-roofe-tackle-ban-rangers-racism-slavia-prague/). Some other descriptions were less emotional, e.g. Thomas Duncan wrote in his post-match report for the BBC that “Roofe was clearly just trying to win the ball, but his foot was so high as to be reckless, and Kolar’s injury looked serious. The goalkeeper had to be replaced, but he returned to the bench for the closing moments after receiving treatment” (Thomas Duncan, BBC Scotland, March 18, 2021, https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/56375487.) It eventually turned out that the goalkeeper did sustain a serious injury to the head – a frontal sinus fracture – forcing him to wear a protective face mask and a helmet in future matches similar to the one another former Czech goalkeeper (Chelsea’s Petr Čech) had to wear throughout his career following an injury.17. Source: https://talksport.com/football/851905/rangers-kemar-roofe-tackle-ban-rangers-racism-slavia-prague/18. The Guardian live text commentary, minute 85, time 21.48, The Guardian, March 18, 2021, the commentators for the live football blog were Rob Smyth and Simon Burnton, https://www.theguardian.com/football/live/2021/mar/18/europa-league-arsenal-v-olympiakos-dinamo-zagreb-v-tottenham-milan-manchester-united-rangers-slavia-praguelive19. The Guardian live text commentary, minute 87, time 21.50, The Guardian, March 18, 2021, https://www.theguardian.com/football/live/2021/mar/18/europa-league-arsenal-v-olympiakos-dinamo-zagreb-v-tottenham-milan-manchester-united-rangers-slavia-praguelive20. UEFA disciplinary decision, issued on April 13, 2021 and made public on April 14, 2021 (Source: UEFA Europa League: Rangers FC v SK Slavia Praha, Last updated April 14, 2021, 18:02, https://www.uefa.com/updates/)21. There is a short smartphone videorecording made by a member of the Slavia team documenting this event. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5DN-pQ88K4).22. “Club Statement: Slavia Denies Allegations of Racism”, March 19, 2021. (Source: https://en.slavia.cz/clanek.asp?id=Club-statement-Slavia-denies-allegations-of-racism-807). A part of the statement is also included in the BBC’s report on the case (“Rangers Want UEFA Action after Glen Kamara Allegedly Racially Abused by Slavia Player”, March 19, 2021; source: https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/56451935).23. The original statement in Czech: “Napadení hráče Ondřeje Kúdely bylo připraveno a promyšleno včetně vědomého zakrytí kamer na místě incidentu. Brutální a surový útok byl veden s plnou intenzitou s cílem zranit a způsobit fyzickou újmu”. (Source: https://www.slavia.cz/clanek.asp?id=Slavia-podala-trestni-oznameni-za-fyzicke-napadeni-18257). Information about the criminal complaint appeared in the local Scottish media as well (https://www.glasgowlive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/slavia-prague-lodge-rangers-assault-20217878)24. Source: https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/sport/football/6843784/rangers-slavia-prague-incident-ibrox-glen-kamara-kudela/25. UEFA disciplinary decision, issued on April 13, 2021 and made public on April 14, 2021 (Source: “UEFA Europa League: Rangers FC v SK Slavia Praha”, Last updated April 14, 2021 18:02, https://www.uefa.com/updates/).26. The press conference is available from Rangers Football Club’s channel on YouTube. (Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfkc9NfIoys)27. His full statement was: “We had never before in the history experienced a similar situation. After the match, UEFA called the coaches and the players involved to attend a meeting to clarify the dispute. But before the discussion started, Kamara hit Kúdela in the face with a fist and ran into the cabin. Coach Gerrard disappointed me; he did not say a word. This match was everything else but fair play”. (“Podobnou situaci jsme nikdy v historii nezažili. UEFA svolala po zápasu trenéry i oba zúčastněné hráče k mítinku, aby se spor vyjasnil. Ještě než ale jednání začalo, Kamara před zraky delegace UEFA dal Kúdelovi pěstí do obličeje a utekl do kabiny. Trenér Gerrard mě zklamal, neřekl ani slovo. Tento zápas byl všechno jiné než fair play”.) (Source: CNN Prima News, 19 March 2021, https://cnn.iprima.cz/hracum-rangers-neslo-o-obrat-ale-o-pomstu-gerrard-me-zklamal-rika-sef-slavie-tvrdik-21357).28. In the Guardian, for instance, the online discussion on the day of the match concentrated largely on the performance of the teams, and Roofe’s violent tackle. Out of the 57 comments that are available on the Guardian site, only three mention the racist incident; several comments, however, are not available due to moderation (deleted due to “breach of community standards” (Source: https://www.theguardian.com/football/2021/mar/18/rangers-slavia-prague-europa-league-match-report)29. See Weizman and Fetzer, “The Discursive Construction of Accountability”.30. The data in the Figure are calculated to the threshold of 300 comments for each subset, i.e. the British subset B and the Czech subset A were recalculated, each using a relevant quotient.31. All translations into English have been done by the author of the article. No spelling mistakes and typos have been corrected in the British data.32. See Chovanec, “The Othering of Roma Migrants”.33. See, for instance: “Liverpool Players support Luis Suarez After FA Race Verdict”, BBC Sport, December 21, 2011. (Source: https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/16291583).34. For the notion of humorous fictionalization, see Kotthoff, “Coherent Keying in Conversational Humour”; Tsakona, “Online Joint Fictionalization”.35. Vásquez, Language, Creativity and Humour.36. Chovanec, The Discourse of Online Sportscasting.37. See also Gavins and Simpson, “Regina v John Terry”.38. See also Back et al., The Changing Face of Football.39. When describing the key incident, I prefer to use the expression “alleged” in order to avoid any implication of assigning blame or guilt or diminishing the seriousness of the offence in any way. Being aware of the highly contested nature of the verbal act in question, which has had legal consequences that have not been concluded yet, I wish to remain academically objective and disinterested, simply drawing on, discussing and interpreting data from mainstream media and users’ online contributions on the topic. It is not my intention to pass any judgement and nothing in this text should be interpreted as favouring one or the other side of the conflict.40. Cleland, “Racism, Football Fans, and Online Message Boards”.41. Weaver, “Liquid Racism and the Ambiguity of Ali G”; Cleland, “Racism, Football Fans, and Online Message Boards”.","PeriodicalId":47395,"journal":{"name":"Soccer & Society","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soccer & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2023.2250660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTRacism is a major social and cultural problem that has, in various forms, plagued football for a long time. Despite the attempts of official bodies to root it out, racist talk and behaviour are still rife among players as well as in fan communities. The present paper provides a case study of online users’ comments on the media coverage of a series of controversial incidents during a recent UEFA Europa League matchinvolving an alleged verbal act of racial abuse between two players. Adopting a discourse analytical perspective, the paper contrasts how the match controversies were reflected in the users’ public online discourses in two different cultural communities, namely the UK and the Czech Republic, and identifies some of the similarities and differences between the two. The analysis shows how the users reframe the underlying racist issue, trivialize it through humour and relativize its seriousness. The data indicate that such discourses surrounding football are important for understanding how fans construct various group identities and how specific socio-cultural contexts influence the perception of race-related controversies . Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. The Rangers coach Steven Gerrard used this phrase when talking about the key incident during his press conference on 18 March 2021: “You could say it’s been a test. I’ve tried to handle the situation in the best way I can but one thing that’s non-negotiable for me is the support for my players. I said last night that some things happen along your way as a player, a coach or a manager that aren’t really football related; they’re bigger than football or a different issue from football”. (Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfkc9NfIoys, time 8.22)2. Schmid, “The Definition of Racism”; Weaver, “Liquid Racism and the Ambiguity of Ali G”.3. van Dijk, “Racist Discourse”.4. Back et al., “Racism in Football”, 77.5. Gavins and Simpson, “Regina v John Terry”.6. Wolfers et al., “Just Because He’s Black”; Wolfers, “Self-directed Racialized Humor”.7. Back et al., “Racism in Football”, 77.8. Or, what Johansson (“Everyday Opinions in News Discussion Forums”) refers to as “everyday opinion” or “public vernacular discourse”.9. See Wrench and Garrett, “Constructions of ‘Whiteness’”; Kroon, “Recontextualizing Racism and Segregation”.10. See, for instance, Cleland, “Racism, Football Fans, and Online Message Boards”.11. Scholarly interest in online newspaper reader comments boards typically adopts a CDA perspective and concentrates on a single set of data (e.g. British) in order to identify racist themes and discourses (cf. Rowe and Goodman (“A Stinking Filthy Race of People”), Santana (“Virtuous or Vitriolic”), Harlow (“Story-chatterers Stirring Up Hate”), Catalano and Fielder (“European Spaces and the Roma”), Chovanec (“Irony as Counter Positioning”); and similar studies on social media data, e.g. Breazu and Machin (“Racism Toward the Roma”) for comments on Romanian Facebook). An example of a contrastive approach using comparable datasets from two different languages/cultures includes Chovanec, (“Re-educating the Roma?”) on anti-Roma racism in British and Czech discussion forums, and Weizman and Fetzer (“The Discursive Construction of Accountability”) on Israeli and British discourse.12. Gavins and Simpson (“Regina v John Terry”) describe several such cases from the English league, as well as the subsequent legal proceedings concerning the 2011 incident between John Terry and Anton Ferdinand.13. See, for instance: https://www.sportbible.com/football/football-news-horrific-photo-of-keepers-injuries-emerge-after-kemar-roofe-head-kick-20210318. Accessed on January 14, 2022.14. UEFA’s decision was appealed by the Rangers, but the appeal was dismissed by UEFA’s decision of 10 May 2021, which cited “dangerously assaulting another player” as the reason for the four-match suspension (Source: “AB: Rangers FC v SK Slavia Praha”, Last updated May 10, 2021, 18:30, https://www.uefa.com/updates/)15. When describing the incident later on, Kolář stated: “If you ever kicked a ball, you know that a foot can always be pulled back. He said that he was the first at the ball. But he did not add that he kicked it out of my hand, straightened his leg and hit me in the head. All the time he could see me. I waited for Roofe to maybe message me on Instagram but instead I was reading hateful messages from Rangers fans” (“Kdo někdy kopal do míče, ví, že noha se vždycky dá stáhnout. Řekl, že byl u balonu první. Ale už nedodal, že mi ho vykopl z ruky, propnul nohu a trefil mi hlavu. Celou dobu mě viděl. Čekal jsem, jestli mi třeba Roofe nenapíše na Instagramu, místo toho jsem si četl nenávistné vzkazy od fanoušků Rangers”). (Source: https://www.ruik.cz/kolar-poprve-o-zraneni-nechteli-me-pustit-z-kabiny-roofe-se-neomluvil-proti-sparte-mi-bylo-zle/, published on April 14, 2021.)16. Jason Cundy and Andy Goldstein on Sports Bar (Source: https://talksport.com/football/851905/rangers-kemar-roofe-tackle-ban-rangers-racism-slavia-prague/). Some other descriptions were less emotional, e.g. Thomas Duncan wrote in his post-match report for the BBC that “Roofe was clearly just trying to win the ball, but his foot was so high as to be reckless, and Kolar’s injury looked serious. The goalkeeper had to be replaced, but he returned to the bench for the closing moments after receiving treatment” (Thomas Duncan, BBC Scotland, March 18, 2021, https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/56375487.) It eventually turned out that the goalkeeper did sustain a serious injury to the head – a frontal sinus fracture – forcing him to wear a protective face mask and a helmet in future matches similar to the one another former Czech goalkeeper (Chelsea’s Petr Čech) had to wear throughout his career following an injury.17. Source: https://talksport.com/football/851905/rangers-kemar-roofe-tackle-ban-rangers-racism-slavia-prague/18. The Guardian live text commentary, minute 85, time 21.48, The Guardian, March 18, 2021, the commentators for the live football blog were Rob Smyth and Simon Burnton, https://www.theguardian.com/football/live/2021/mar/18/europa-league-arsenal-v-olympiakos-dinamo-zagreb-v-tottenham-milan-manchester-united-rangers-slavia-praguelive19. The Guardian live text commentary, minute 87, time 21.50, The Guardian, March 18, 2021, https://www.theguardian.com/football/live/2021/mar/18/europa-league-arsenal-v-olympiakos-dinamo-zagreb-v-tottenham-milan-manchester-united-rangers-slavia-praguelive20. UEFA disciplinary decision, issued on April 13, 2021 and made public on April 14, 2021 (Source: UEFA Europa League: Rangers FC v SK Slavia Praha, Last updated April 14, 2021, 18:02, https://www.uefa.com/updates/)21. There is a short smartphone videorecording made by a member of the Slavia team documenting this event. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5DN-pQ88K4).22. “Club Statement: Slavia Denies Allegations of Racism”, March 19, 2021. (Source: https://en.slavia.cz/clanek.asp?id=Club-statement-Slavia-denies-allegations-of-racism-807). A part of the statement is also included in the BBC’s report on the case (“Rangers Want UEFA Action after Glen Kamara Allegedly Racially Abused by Slavia Player”, March 19, 2021; source: https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/56451935).23. The original statement in Czech: “Napadení hráče Ondřeje Kúdely bylo připraveno a promyšleno včetně vědomého zakrytí kamer na místě incidentu. Brutální a surový útok byl veden s plnou intenzitou s cílem zranit a způsobit fyzickou újmu”. (Source: https://www.slavia.cz/clanek.asp?id=Slavia-podala-trestni-oznameni-za-fyzicke-napadeni-18257). Information about the criminal complaint appeared in the local Scottish media as well (https://www.glasgowlive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/slavia-prague-lodge-rangers-assault-20217878)24. Source: https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/sport/football/6843784/rangers-slavia-prague-incident-ibrox-glen-kamara-kudela/25. UEFA disciplinary decision, issued on April 13, 2021 and made public on April 14, 2021 (Source: “UEFA Europa League: Rangers FC v SK Slavia Praha”, Last updated April 14, 2021 18:02, https://www.uefa.com/updates/).26. The press conference is available from Rangers Football Club’s channel on YouTube. (Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfkc9NfIoys)27. His full statement was: “We had never before in the history experienced a similar situation. After the match, UEFA called the coaches and the players involved to attend a meeting to clarify the dispute. But before the discussion started, Kamara hit Kúdela in the face with a fist and ran into the cabin. Coach Gerrard disappointed me; he did not say a word. This match was everything else but fair play”. (“Podobnou situaci jsme nikdy v historii nezažili. UEFA svolala po zápasu trenéry i oba zúčastněné hráče k mítinku, aby se spor vyjasnil. Ještě než ale jednání začalo, Kamara před zraky delegace UEFA dal Kúdelovi pěstí do obličeje a utekl do kabiny. Trenér Gerrard mě zklamal, neřekl ani slovo. Tento zápas byl všechno jiné než fair play”.) (Source: CNN Prima News, 19 March 2021, https://cnn.iprima.cz/hracum-rangers-neslo-o-obrat-ale-o-pomstu-gerrard-me-zklamal-rika-sef-slavie-tvrdik-21357).28. In the Guardian, for instance, the online discussion on the day of the match concentrated largely on the performance of the teams, and Roofe’s violent tackle. Out of the 57 comments that are available on the Guardian site, only three mention the racist incident; several comments, however, are not available due to moderation (deleted due to “breach of community standards” (Source: https://www.theguardian.com/football/2021/mar/18/rangers-slavia-prague-europa-league-match-report)29. See Weizman and Fetzer, “The Discursive Construction of Accountability”.30. The data in the Figure are calculated to the threshold of 300 comments for each subset, i.e. the British subset B and the Czech subset A were recalculated, each using a relevant quotient.31. All translations into English have been done by the author of the article. No spelling mistakes and typos have been corrected in the British data.32. See Chovanec, “The Othering of Roma Migrants”.33. See, for instance: “Liverpool Players support Luis Suarez After FA Race Verdict”, BBC Sport, December 21, 2011. (Source: https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/16291583).34. For the notion of humorous fictionalization, see Kotthoff, “Coherent Keying in Conversational Humour”; Tsakona, “Online Joint Fictionalization”.35. Vásquez, Language, Creativity and Humour.36. Chovanec, The Discourse of Online Sportscasting.37. See also Gavins and Simpson, “Regina v John Terry”.38. See also Back et al., The Changing Face of Football.39. When describing the key incident, I prefer to use the expression “alleged” in order to avoid any implication of assigning blame or guilt or diminishing the seriousness of the offence in any way. Being aware of the highly contested nature of the verbal act in question, which has had legal consequences that have not been concluded yet, I wish to remain academically objective and disinterested, simply drawing on, discussing and interpreting data from mainstream media and users’ online contributions on the topic. It is not my intention to pass any judgement and nothing in this text should be interpreted as favouring one or the other side of the conflict.40. Cleland, “Racism, Football Fans, and Online Message Boards”.41. Weaver, “Liquid Racism and the Ambiguity of Ali G”; Cleland, “Racism, Football Fans, and Online Message Boards”.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“比足球更大”:足球场内外的种族主义言论
抽象主义是一个主要的社会和文化问题,以各种形式长期困扰着足球。尽管官方机构试图根除这一现象,但在球员和粉丝社区中,种族主义言论和行为仍然很普遍。本文提供了一个案例研究,在线用户对媒体报道的一系列有争议的事件进行了评论,这些事件发生在最近的欧联杯比赛中,涉及两名球员之间据称的口头种族歧视行为。本文采用话语分析的视角,对比了在英国和捷克这两个不同的文化共同体中,比赛争议是如何在用户的网络公共话语中反映出来的,并找出了两者之间的一些异同。分析显示,用户如何重新构建潜在的种族主义问题,通过幽默将其琐细化,并将其严重性相对化。数据表明,围绕足球的这种话语对于理解球迷如何构建各种群体身份以及特定的社会文化背景如何影响对种族相关争议的看法非常重要。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。在2021年3月18日的新闻发布会上,流浪者队主教练杰拉德在谈到这一关键事件时使用了这句话:“你可以说这是一场考验。我已经尽力以我所能做到的最好的方式来处理这个问题,但有一件事对我来说是不可协商的,那就是支持我的球员。我昨晚说过,作为一名球员、教练或经理,你会遇到一些与足球无关的事情;它们比足球更重要,或者是与足球不同的问题。”(来源:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfkc9NfIoys,时间8.22)施密德,《种族主义的定义》;韦弗,《流动的种族主义和阿里·G的模糊性》,第3页。范戴克,《种族主义话语》,第4页。Back等人,“足球中的种族主义”,77.5。加文斯和辛普森,“雷吉娜诉约翰·特里”。Wolfers等人,《仅仅因为他是黑人》;Wolfers,“自我导向的种族化幽默”。Back等人,“足球中的种族主义”,77.8。或者,约翰逊(《新闻讨论论坛中的日常观点》)所说的“日常观点”或“公共白话话语”。参见扳手和加勒特,““白”的结构”;《种族主义和种族隔离的重新语境化》,第10期。例如,请看克利兰的《种族主义、足球迷和在线留言板》。对在线报纸读者评论板的学术兴趣通常采用CDA视角,并专注于单一数据集(例如英国人),以识别种族主义主题和话语(参见罗和古德曼(“一个恶臭肮脏的种族”),桑塔纳(“善良或刻薄”),哈洛(“故事喋喋不休的人煽动仇恨”),卡塔兰诺和菲尔德(“欧洲空间和罗马人”),霍瓦内克(“反讽作为反定位”);以及对社交媒体数据的类似研究,例如Breazu和Machin(“对罗姆人的种族主义”)在罗马尼亚Facebook上的评论)。使用来自两种不同语言/文化的可比数据集的对比方法的例子包括Chovanec(“对罗姆人的再教育?”)关于英国和捷克讨论论坛中的反罗姆种族主义,以及Weizman和Fetzer(“问责制的话语构建”)关于以色列和英国话语。加文斯和辛普森(“里贾纳诉约翰·特里”)描述了英格兰联赛的几个这样的案例,以及随后关于2011年约翰·特里和安东·费迪南之间事件的法律诉讼。例如:https://www.sportbible.com/football/football-news-horrific-photo-of-keepers-injuries-emerge-after-kemar-roofe-head-kick-20210318。2014年1月14日访问。流浪者队对欧足联的决定提出上诉,但上诉被欧足联于2021年5月10日的决定驳回,该决定以“危险地袭击另一名球员”作为禁赛四场的原因(来源:“AB:流浪者FC vs斯拉维亚普拉哈”,最后更新于2021年5月10日,18:30,https://www.uefa.com/updates/)15)。当后来描述这一事件时,Kolář说:“如果你踢过球,你就会知道一只脚总是可以向后拉的。他说他是第一个到舞会的。但他没有补充说,他把它从我手中踢了出去,伸直了腿,打了我的头。他一直都能看到我。我等着Roofe在Instagram上给我发消息,但我却看到了来自流浪者队球迷的仇恨信息(“Kdo n<e:1> kdy kopal do míče, ví, že noha se vždycky d<e:1> stáhnout”)。Řekl, že byl u balonu první。Ale uv nedodal, že mi ho vykopl z ruky, proprol nohu和trefil mi hlavu。Celou dobu mv vidk。Čekal jsem, jestli mi třeba Roofe nenapíše na instagram, místo toho jsem si <e:1> etl nenávistné vzkazy od fanoušků Rangers”)。(来源:https://www.ruik.cz/kolar-poprve-o-zraneni-nechteli-me-pustit-z-kabiny-roofe-se-neomluvil-proti-sparte-mi-bylo-zle/,发布于2021年4月14日。) 英国的B组和捷克的A组重新计算,每组使用一个相关的商数。这篇文章的所有英文翻译都是由作者完成的。在英国数据中没有拼写错误和打字错误被纠正。参见Chovanec,“罗姆移民的其他部分”。例如:《利物浦球员在英足总比赛裁决后支持苏亚雷斯》,BBC体育,2011年12月21日。(来源:https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/16291583)点。关于幽默小说化的概念,见Kotthoff,“对话式幽默的连贯键控”;《网络联合小说化》第35页。Vásquez,语言,创造力和幽默。《网络体育转播的话语》[j]。参见Gavins和Simpson,“Regina v John Terry”。38。参见Back et al.,足球的变化。在描述关键事件时,我更倾向于使用“据称”一词,以避免任何推卸责任或有罪的暗示,或以任何方式减轻罪行的严重性。由于意识到所讨论的言语行为的高度争议性,其法律后果尚未得出结论,我希望在学术上保持客观和不感兴趣,简单地借鉴,讨论和解释主流媒体和用户在线上对该主题的贡献数据。我无意作出任何判断,本案文中的任何内容都不应被解释为偏袒冲突的一方或另一方。种族主义、足球迷和在线留言板>,第41页。韦弗,《流动的种族主义与阿里·G的模糊性》;克莱兰,《种族主义、足球迷和在线留言板》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soccer & Society
Soccer & Society HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
80
期刊最新文献
The 2022 FIFA world cup in Qatar: resident interests and attitudes Thin barbed wire fences of religions, where football binds millions: exploring the ultras phenomenon in the Kolkata maidan Urban graphic heritage and the making of place: the ‘arsenalisation’ of the Emirates stadium Non-Big five football clubs’ strategies for generating transfer revenues: the case of Switzerland’s Super League The making of a global FIFA: cold war politics and the rise of joão havelange to the FIFA presidency, 1950–1974
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1