The mediating role of anxiety and depression in the relationship between coping styles and life satisfaction among frontline medical workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study

Ibrain Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI:10.1002/ibra.12133
Gui-Fang Chen, Ye-Ping Zhang, Zhi-Jie Wei, Xin-Lan Zhang, Jun Liu, Juan Peng, Zu-Cai Xu, Chang-Yin Yu, Jun Zhang
{"title":"The mediating role of anxiety and depression in the relationship between coping styles and life satisfaction among frontline medical workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Gui-Fang Chen,&nbsp;Ye-Ping Zhang,&nbsp;Zhi-Jie Wei,&nbsp;Xin-Lan Zhang,&nbsp;Jun Liu,&nbsp;Juan Peng,&nbsp;Zu-Cai Xu,&nbsp;Chang-Yin Yu,&nbsp;Jun Zhang","doi":"10.1002/ibra.12133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to examine the mediating role of anxiety and depression in the relationship between coping styles and life satisfaction among frontline medical workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Five hundred and fourteen frontline medical workers from Zunyi were recruited to complete questionnaires, including the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), and Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ). SPSS 24.0 was used to measure the characteristics of anxiety, depression, life satisfaction, and coping styles. We found that the prevalence rates of anxiety and depression among study participants were 22.57% and 18.29%, respectively. Besides, anxiety was positively correlated with depression; anxiety and depression were positively correlated with passive coping style but negatively correlated with life satisfaction and active coping style; life satisfaction was positively correlated with active coping style and negatively correlated with passive coping style (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Moreover, anxiety and depression mediated the relationship between coping styles and life satisfaction. Anxiety accounted for 18.6% of the effect of active coping style and 35.48% of the effect of passive coping style on life satisfaction. Depression accounted for 48.84% of the effect of active coping style and 67.74% of the effect of passive coping style on life satisfaction. The present study provides novel insights into the effect of subclinical anxiety and depression on frontline medical workers in the pandemic area. Anxiety and depression yielded a mediating effect on the relationship between coping styles and life satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":94030,"journal":{"name":"Ibrain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ibra.12133","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ibrain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ibra.12133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the mediating role of anxiety and depression in the relationship between coping styles and life satisfaction among frontline medical workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Five hundred and fourteen frontline medical workers from Zunyi were recruited to complete questionnaires, including the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), and Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ). SPSS 24.0 was used to measure the characteristics of anxiety, depression, life satisfaction, and coping styles. We found that the prevalence rates of anxiety and depression among study participants were 22.57% and 18.29%, respectively. Besides, anxiety was positively correlated with depression; anxiety and depression were positively correlated with passive coping style but negatively correlated with life satisfaction and active coping style; life satisfaction was positively correlated with active coping style and negatively correlated with passive coping style (all p < 0.001). Moreover, anxiety and depression mediated the relationship between coping styles and life satisfaction. Anxiety accounted for 18.6% of the effect of active coping style and 35.48% of the effect of passive coping style on life satisfaction. Depression accounted for 48.84% of the effect of active coping style and 67.74% of the effect of passive coping style on life satisfaction. The present study provides novel insights into the effect of subclinical anxiety and depression on frontline medical workers in the pandemic area. Anxiety and depression yielded a mediating effect on the relationship between coping styles and life satisfaction.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
焦虑和抑郁在 COVID-19 大流行期间前线医务工作者的应对方式与生活满意度之间关系中的中介作用:横断面研究
本研究旨在探讨焦虑和抑郁在 COVID-19 大流行期间一线医务工作者的应对方式与生活满意度之间的中介作用。研究共招募了 514 名遵义一线医务工作者,他们填写了包括焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、生活满意度量表(SWLS)和简化应对方式问卷(SCSQ)在内的问卷。我们使用 SPSS 24.0 测量了焦虑、抑郁、生活满意度和应对方式的特征。我们发现,研究参与者中焦虑和抑郁的患病率分别为 22.57% 和 18.29%。此外,焦虑与抑郁呈正相关;焦虑和抑郁与被动应对方式呈正相关,但与生活满意度和主动应对方式呈负相关;生活满意度与主动应对方式呈正相关,与被动应对方式呈负相关(均为 p <0.001)。此外,焦虑和抑郁也是应对方式与生活满意度之间关系的中介。焦虑占主动应对方式对生活满意度影响的 18.6%,占被动应对方式对生活满意度影响的 35.48%。抑郁占主动应对方式对生活满意度影响的 48.84%,占被动应对方式对生活满意度影响的 67.74%。本研究就亚临床焦虑和抑郁对大流行病地区一线医务工作者的影响提供了新的见解。焦虑和抑郁对应对方式与生活满意度之间的关系产生了中介效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Identification of immune infiltration and PANoptosis-related molecular clusters and predictive model in Alzheimer's disease based on transcriptome analysis The application of eXplainable artificial intelligence in studying cognition: A scoping review Neuroscience of cancer: Research progress and emerging of the field Calcium accumulation or iron deposition: Delving into the temporal sequence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis pathophysiology in the primary motor cortex
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1