‘It will never be well with SARS’: A discourse analytic study of the #EndSARS protests on social media

IF 2.4 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Discourse & Society Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI:10.1177/09579265231200994
Sopuruchi Christian Aboh
{"title":"‘It will never be well with SARS’: A discourse analytic study of the #EndSARS protests on social media","authors":"Sopuruchi Christian Aboh","doi":"10.1177/09579265231200994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses the discursive strategies used by #EndSARS protesters in their tweets and Facebook comments to construct SARS officers, hold the Nigerian government accountable and demand social change. Informed by social media critical discourse analysis (SMCDA) and social movement theory, the analysis revealed three strategies: constructing SARS as oppressors, representing the Nigerian government as insensitive and issuing a clarion call for action. The analysis shows that these strategies enabled the protesters to construct the victim-aggressor categorisation, thereby legitimising their resistance to police brutality and demand for change. The study also highlights how the protesters deployed local linguistic resources and ideologies to appeal to the emotions of other Nigerians to join the protest. The study demonstrates how digital political mobilisation can galvanise reform in Nigeria, where leaders and law enforcement agencies are held accountable for their (in)actions. This study contributes to the developing interdisciplinary studies on SMCDA and digital activism.","PeriodicalId":47965,"journal":{"name":"Discourse & Society","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265231200994","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyses the discursive strategies used by #EndSARS protesters in their tweets and Facebook comments to construct SARS officers, hold the Nigerian government accountable and demand social change. Informed by social media critical discourse analysis (SMCDA) and social movement theory, the analysis revealed three strategies: constructing SARS as oppressors, representing the Nigerian government as insensitive and issuing a clarion call for action. The analysis shows that these strategies enabled the protesters to construct the victim-aggressor categorisation, thereby legitimising their resistance to police brutality and demand for change. The study also highlights how the protesters deployed local linguistic resources and ideologies to appeal to the emotions of other Nigerians to join the protest. The study demonstrates how digital political mobilisation can galvanise reform in Nigeria, where leaders and law enforcement agencies are held accountable for their (in)actions. This study contributes to the developing interdisciplinary studies on SMCDA and digital activism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“SARS永远不会好”:对社交媒体上#EndSARS抗议活动的话语分析研究
本文分析了#EndSARS抗议者在推特和Facebook评论中使用的话语策略,以构建SARS官员,追究尼日利亚政府的责任,并要求社会变革。根据社会媒体批评话语分析(SMCDA)和社会运动理论,该分析揭示了三种策略:将SARS视为压迫者,将尼日利亚政府描述为麻木不知觉,并发出行动呼吁。分析表明,这些策略使抗议者能够构建受害者-侵略者的分类,从而使他们对警察暴行的抵抗和对变革的要求合法化。该研究还强调了抗议者如何利用当地的语言资源和意识形态来吸引其他尼日利亚人加入抗议活动。该研究展示了数字政治动员如何能够激发尼日利亚的改革,在尼日利亚,领导人和执法机构要对自己的行为负责。本研究有助于SMCDA与数字行动主义的跨学科研究的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Discourse & Society is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal whose major aim is to publish outstanding research at the boundaries of discourse analysis and the social sciences. It focuses on explicit theory formation and analysis of the relationships between the structures of text, talk, language use, verbal interaction or communication, on the one hand, and societal, political or cultural micro- and macrostructures and cognitive social representations, on the other hand. That is, D&S studies society through discourse and discourse through an analysis of its socio-political and cultural functions or implications. Its contributions are based on advanced theory formation and methodologies of several disciplines in the humanities and social sciences.
期刊最新文献
The Islamic State’s use of the Qur’an in its Magazines, Dabiq and Rumiyah Pro-vaccination personal narratives in response to online hesitancy about the HPV vaccine: The challenge of tellability. Racist discourse in a German far-right blog: A corpus-driven approach using word embeddings Antisemitism in contemporary Türkiye: Discourses on Turkish Jews on Twitter You’re a murderer: Critical discourse analysis of conversations around abortions in the Russian talk show
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1