Overcoming ethical and legal obstacles to data linkage in health research: stakeholder perspectives

Julie-Anne Smit, Rieke Van der Graaf, Menno Mostert, Ilonca Vaartjes, Mira Zuidgeest, Diederik Grobbee, Johannes J.M. van Delden
{"title":"Overcoming ethical and legal obstacles to data linkage in health research: stakeholder perspectives","authors":"Julie-Anne Smit, Rieke Van der Graaf, Menno Mostert, Ilonca Vaartjes, Mira Zuidgeest, Diederik Grobbee, Johannes J.M. van Delden","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionData linkage for health research purposes enables the answering of countless new research questions, is said to be cost effective and less intrusive than other means of data collection. Nevertheless, health researchers are currently dealing with a complicated, fragmented, and inconsistent regulatory landscape with regard to the processing of data, and progress in health research is hindered. AimWe designed a qualitative study to assess what different stakeholders perceive as ethical and legal obstacles to data linkage for health research purposes, and how these obstacles could be overcome. MethodsTwo focus groups and eighteen semi-structured in-depth interviews were held to collect opinions and insights of various stakeholders. An inductive thematic analysis approach was used to identify overarching themes. ResultsThis study showed that the ambiguity regarding the `correct' interpretation of the law, the fragmentation of policies governing the processing of personal health data, and the demandingness of legal requirements are experienced as causes for the impediment of data linkage for research purposes by the participating stakeholders. To remove or reduce these obstacles authoritative interpretations of the laws and regulations governing data linkage should be issued. The participants furthermore encouraged the harmonisation of data linkage policies, as well as promoting trust and transparency and the enhancement of technical and organisational measures. Lastly, there is a demand for legislative and regulatory modifications amongst the participants. ConclusionsTo overcome the obstacles in data linkage for scientific research purposes, perhaps we should shift the focus from adapting the current laws and regulations governing data linkage, or even designing completely new laws, towards creating a more thorough understanding of the law and making better use of the flexibilities within the existing legislation. Important steps in achieving this shift could be clarification of the legal provisions governing data linkage by issuing authoritative interpretations, as well as the strengthening of ethical-legal oversight bodies.","PeriodicalId":132937,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Population Data Science","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionData linkage for health research purposes enables the answering of countless new research questions, is said to be cost effective and less intrusive than other means of data collection. Nevertheless, health researchers are currently dealing with a complicated, fragmented, and inconsistent regulatory landscape with regard to the processing of data, and progress in health research is hindered. AimWe designed a qualitative study to assess what different stakeholders perceive as ethical and legal obstacles to data linkage for health research purposes, and how these obstacles could be overcome. MethodsTwo focus groups and eighteen semi-structured in-depth interviews were held to collect opinions and insights of various stakeholders. An inductive thematic analysis approach was used to identify overarching themes. ResultsThis study showed that the ambiguity regarding the `correct' interpretation of the law, the fragmentation of policies governing the processing of personal health data, and the demandingness of legal requirements are experienced as causes for the impediment of data linkage for research purposes by the participating stakeholders. To remove or reduce these obstacles authoritative interpretations of the laws and regulations governing data linkage should be issued. The participants furthermore encouraged the harmonisation of data linkage policies, as well as promoting trust and transparency and the enhancement of technical and organisational measures. Lastly, there is a demand for legislative and regulatory modifications amongst the participants. ConclusionsTo overcome the obstacles in data linkage for scientific research purposes, perhaps we should shift the focus from adapting the current laws and regulations governing data linkage, or even designing completely new laws, towards creating a more thorough understanding of the law and making better use of the flexibilities within the existing legislation. Important steps in achieving this shift could be clarification of the legal provisions governing data linkage by issuing authoritative interpretations, as well as the strengthening of ethical-legal oversight bodies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克服卫生研究中数据联系的伦理和法律障碍:利益攸关方观点
用于卫生研究目的的数据链接能够回答无数新的研究问题,据说比其他数据收集手段更具成本效益和侵入性。然而,卫生研究人员目前正在处理数据处理方面复杂、分散和不一致的监管环境,阻碍了卫生研究的进展。我们设计了一项定性研究,以评估不同利益攸关方对卫生研究目的的数据链接所认为的道德和法律障碍,以及如何克服这些障碍。方法通过2个焦点小组和18个半结构化深度访谈,收集各利益相关者的意见和见解。采用归纳主题分析方法来确定总体主题。结果本研究表明,对法律的“正确”解释的模糊性,管理个人健康数据处理的政策的碎片化以及法律要求的苛刻是参与利益相关者为研究目的进行数据链接的障碍原因。为了消除或减少这些障碍,应发布有关数据联系的法律和条例的权威解释。与会者还鼓励协调数据联系政策,促进信任和透明度,加强技术和组织措施。最后,参与者之间有立法和监管修改的需求。为了克服科学研究中数据链接的障碍,也许我们应该将重点从调整现行的数据链接法律法规,甚至设计全新的法律,转向对法律的更彻底的理解,并更好地利用现有立法中的灵活性。实现这一转变的重要步骤可以是通过发布权威解释来澄清有关数据联系的法律规定,以及加强道德-法律监督机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using novel data linkage of biobank data with administrative health data to inform genomic analysis for future precision medicine treatment of congenital heart disease Common governance model: a way to avoid data segregation between existing trusted research environment Federated learning for generating synthetic data: a scoping review Health Data Governance for Research Use in Alberta Establishment of a birth-to-education cohort of 1 million Palestinian refugees using electronic medical records and electronic education records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1