A comparison of three rural emergency homeless shelters: exploring the experiences and lessons learned in small town Ontario

Ellen Buck-McFadyen
{"title":"A comparison of three rural emergency homeless shelters: exploring the experiences and lessons learned in small town Ontario","authors":"Ellen Buck-McFadyen","doi":"10.1080/10530789.2023.2276592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIntroduction: Per capita rates of homelessness are higher in many rural communities than Canada’s largest cities, yet little attention has focused on strategies to address rural homelessness. This study compared experiences and lessons learned from three models of homeless shelters in a small town in rural Ontario: a church, motel, and warming center. Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 17 individuals who stayed in or administered any of three emergency shelters that ran between 2019 and 2022. Results: Participants described challenges resulting from insufficient structure, policies, partnerships, funding, and training that led the church and motel shelters to be unsustainable. The warming center had more sustainable funding but lacked supports and had short operating hours. Several aspects of participants’ experiences were unique to the rural context, including the lack of infrastructure, precarity of services, and feelings of being surveilled and pushed out of their community. Informal supports and a sense of connection to their hometown meant most had no intention of leaving. Conclusion: The strengths of each model and lessons learned offer opportunities to improve and adapt emergency shelters to the rural context.KEYWORDS: Rural homelessnessemergency shelterslived experiencehealth and social services‌sustainability AcknowledgementsI’d like to acknowledge the support of all the participants who shared their experiences with me so that others might benefit from the lessons they’ve learned, and the North Hastings Community Trust that helped with recruitment and offered space for several interviews.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly to maintain privacy of individuals that participated in the study. The data will be shared on reasonable request.Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.Notes on contributorsEllen Buck-McFadyenEllen Buck-McFadyen began her career in community and public health nursing. She completed her PhD in nursing at McMaster University and is currently an assistant professor and the graduate program director in the Trent/Fleming School of Nursing at Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario. Ellen has been conducting research in the areas of rural health and the social determinants of health, including the impact of social capital, food insecurity, homelessness, and substance use in the rural context.","PeriodicalId":45390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10530789.2023.2276592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Per capita rates of homelessness are higher in many rural communities than Canada’s largest cities, yet little attention has focused on strategies to address rural homelessness. This study compared experiences and lessons learned from three models of homeless shelters in a small town in rural Ontario: a church, motel, and warming center. Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 17 individuals who stayed in or administered any of three emergency shelters that ran between 2019 and 2022. Results: Participants described challenges resulting from insufficient structure, policies, partnerships, funding, and training that led the church and motel shelters to be unsustainable. The warming center had more sustainable funding but lacked supports and had short operating hours. Several aspects of participants’ experiences were unique to the rural context, including the lack of infrastructure, precarity of services, and feelings of being surveilled and pushed out of their community. Informal supports and a sense of connection to their hometown meant most had no intention of leaving. Conclusion: The strengths of each model and lessons learned offer opportunities to improve and adapt emergency shelters to the rural context.KEYWORDS: Rural homelessnessemergency shelterslived experiencehealth and social services‌sustainability AcknowledgementsI’d like to acknowledge the support of all the participants who shared their experiences with me so that others might benefit from the lessons they’ve learned, and the North Hastings Community Trust that helped with recruitment and offered space for several interviews.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly to maintain privacy of individuals that participated in the study. The data will be shared on reasonable request.Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.Notes on contributorsEllen Buck-McFadyenEllen Buck-McFadyen began her career in community and public health nursing. She completed her PhD in nursing at McMaster University and is currently an assistant professor and the graduate program director in the Trent/Fleming School of Nursing at Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario. Ellen has been conducting research in the areas of rural health and the social determinants of health, including the impact of social capital, food insecurity, homelessness, and substance use in the rural context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三个农村紧急无家可归者收容所的比较:探讨安大略省小镇的经验和教训
摘要简介:加拿大许多农村社区的人均无家可归率高于大城市,但解决农村无家可归问题的策略却很少受到关注。本研究比较了安大略省农村小镇上三种无家可归者收容所的经验和教训:教堂、汽车旅馆和取暖中心。方法:对17名在2019年至2022年期间入住或管理三个紧急避难所中的任何一个的人进行了定性访谈。结果:参与者描述了结构、政策、伙伴关系、资金和培训不足导致教堂和汽车旅馆庇护所不可持续的挑战。暖化中心有更可持续的资金,但缺乏支持,营业时间短。参与者的经历有几个方面是农村环境所特有的,包括缺乏基础设施、服务不稳定、被监视和被赶出社区的感觉。非正式的支持和与家乡的联系意味着大多数人无意离开。结论:每种模式的优势和吸取的经验教训为改进和调整应急住房以适应农村情况提供了机会。关键词:农村homelessnessemergency shelterslived experiencehealth和社会服务‌可持续性AcknowledgementsI想承认的支持所有的参与者与我分享他们的经验,这样其他人可能会受益于他们的教训,和朝鲜黑斯廷斯社区信托帮助招聘和几个采访提供空间。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据可用性声明为了保护参与研究的个人的隐私,本文所涉及的数据不能公开分享。在合理的要求下,我们将分享这些数据。其他信息资金作者报告没有与本文所述工作相关的资金。ellen Buck-McFadyen从社区和公共卫生护理开始了她的职业生涯。她在麦克马斯特大学完成了护理博士学位,目前是安大略省彼得伯勒市特伦特大学特伦特/弗莱明护理学院的助理教授和研究生项目主任。Ellen一直在农村卫生和健康的社会决定因素领域进行研究,包括社会资本的影响、粮食不安全、无家可归和农村环境中的物质使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Disability and its consequence on consumption: evidence from Ethiopian households “It feels like I’m a step closer to my ultimate goal of stable housing:” a qualitative study of unhoused people’s experiences in alternative shelters in Portland Public transit and the needs of people experiencing homelessness: a directed content analysis guided by Maslow’s hierarchy of needs Perceptions of social support usage among single men experiencing recurrent homelessness Perceptions of fatherhood among people displaced by war in the southern Philippines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1