Exergoeconomic and Thermodynamic Analyses of Solar Power Tower Based Novel Combined Helium Brayton Cycle-Transcritical CO2 Cycle for Carbon Free Power Generation

IF 4.4 4区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Global Challenges Pub Date : 2023-11-03 DOI:10.1002/gch2.202300191
Yunis Khan, Deepak Singh, Hakan Caliskan, Hiki Hong
{"title":"Exergoeconomic and Thermodynamic Analyses of Solar Power Tower Based Novel Combined Helium Brayton Cycle-Transcritical CO2 Cycle for Carbon Free Power Generation","authors":"Yunis Khan,&nbsp;Deepak Singh,&nbsp;Hakan Caliskan,&nbsp;Hiki Hong","doi":"10.1002/gch2.202300191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the present study, a novel combined power cycle for solar power tower (SPT) system consisting of helium Brayton cycle (HBC) and transcritical CO<sub>2</sub> (TCO<sub>2</sub>) for waste heat recovery is being studied for carbon-free generation. The performance of the proposed SPT based combined cycle (SPT-HBC-TCO<sub>2</sub> cycle) is compared with SPT based basic cycle (SPT-HBC) based on exergoeconomic and thermodynamic analyses. It is concluded that the SPT-based combined cycle (SPT-HBC-TCO<sub>2</sub> cycle) produces a thermal efficiency of 32.39% and exergy efficiency of 34.68% with an electricity cost of 1.613 UScent kWh<sup>−1</sup>. The exergy and thermal efficiency of the SPT-based combined cycle are enhanced by 13.18% and 13.21% respectively, while electricity cost is reduced by around 2% as compared to the SPT-based basic cycle (SPT-HBC) configuration at base conditions. A notable finding is that, despite the additional expenditures related to the bottoming cycle, the cost of electricity is lesser for the proposed combined cycle. Additionally, a comparison with the related prior published research exhibits that the performance of the current novel system is superior to that of the systems based on steam rankine cycle and supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> cycles.</p>","PeriodicalId":12646,"journal":{"name":"Global Challenges","volume":"7 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gch2.202300191","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gch2.202300191","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present study, a novel combined power cycle for solar power tower (SPT) system consisting of helium Brayton cycle (HBC) and transcritical CO2 (TCO2) for waste heat recovery is being studied for carbon-free generation. The performance of the proposed SPT based combined cycle (SPT-HBC-TCO2 cycle) is compared with SPT based basic cycle (SPT-HBC) based on exergoeconomic and thermodynamic analyses. It is concluded that the SPT-based combined cycle (SPT-HBC-TCO2 cycle) produces a thermal efficiency of 32.39% and exergy efficiency of 34.68% with an electricity cost of 1.613 UScent kWh−1. The exergy and thermal efficiency of the SPT-based combined cycle are enhanced by 13.18% and 13.21% respectively, while electricity cost is reduced by around 2% as compared to the SPT-based basic cycle (SPT-HBC) configuration at base conditions. A notable finding is that, despite the additional expenditures related to the bottoming cycle, the cost of electricity is lesser for the proposed combined cycle. Additionally, a comparison with the related prior published research exhibits that the performance of the current novel system is superior to that of the systems based on steam rankine cycle and supercritical CO2 cycles.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于太阳能发电塔的新型无碳发电氦-布雷顿循环-跨临界 CO2 循环的排气经济学和热力学分析
在本研究中,为实现无碳发电,研究了一种新型太阳能发电塔(SPT)系统联合动力循环,该循环由氦-布雷顿循环(HBC)和用于废热回收的跨临界二氧化碳(TCO2)组成。根据运行经济学和热力学分析,对拟议的基于 SPT 的联合循环(SPT-HBC-TCO2 循环)与基于 SPT 的基本循环(SPT-HBC)的性能进行了比较。结果表明,基于 SPT 的联合循环(SPT-HBC-TCO2 循环)的热效率为 32.39%,放能效 率为 34.68%,发电成本为 1.613 UScent kWh-1。与基本条件下基于 SPT 的基本循环(SPT-HBC)配置相比,基于 SPT 的联合循环的放能效率和热效率分别提高了 13.18% 和 13.21%,而电力成本降低了约 2%。一个值得注意的发现是,尽管与底部循环相关的支出增加了,但拟议的联合循环的电力成本却降低了。此外,与之前发表的相关研究相比,当前新型系统的性能优于基于蒸汽秩循环和超临界二氧化碳循环的系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Challenges
Global Challenges MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Advancing Economical and Environmentally Conscious Electrification: A Comprehensive Framework for Microgrid Design in Off-Grid Regions Issue Information New Insight into Mercury Removal from Fish Meat Using a Single-Component Solution Containing cysteine Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production Using TiO2-based Catalysts: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1