Health Inequities in the Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes of Plastic Surgery: A Scoping Review

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q Medicine Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2023-11-03 DOI:10.1177/22925503231210878
Ty Moore, Danya Nees, Samuel Jacobsen, Andriana Peña, Reece Anderson, Elizabeth Garrett, Jordan Staggs, Philo Waters, Mitchell Love, Bryan Dunford, Rigel Bacani, Kelsi Batioja, Matt Vassar
{"title":"Health Inequities in the Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes of Plastic Surgery: A Scoping Review","authors":"Ty Moore, Danya Nees, Samuel Jacobsen, Andriana Peña, Reece Anderson, Elizabeth Garrett, Jordan Staggs, Philo Waters, Mitchell Love, Bryan Dunford, Rigel Bacani, Kelsi Batioja, Matt Vassar","doi":"10.1177/22925503231210878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Plastic surgery is routinely sought after for the treatment of breast cancer, cleft lip and palate, and gender-affirming care. Inequities exist in plastic surgery in regard to the epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes experienced by patients. The purpose of our scoping review was to (1) outline current literature addressing health inequities in plastic surgery and (2) draw attention to the gaps in this literature. Methods: This scoping review was developed following guidelines from the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. An initial search of MEDLINE (via PubMed), Ovid Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus databases was performed to locate published articles on health inequities in plastic surgery. Articles had to address at least one of the National Institutes of Health's inequity groups we examined. Results: After reviewing full text, 153 studies were included in our final sample. We found race/ethnicity (94/153) and age (90/153) to be the 2 most commonly evaluated inequities in the scoping review. We discovered that patient populations that were older had public or no insurance and/or were in historically marginalized racial/ethnic groups were often less likely to be offered plastic surgery treatments. Conclusion: This scoping review describes the current literature on health inequities in plastic surgery and highlights gaps in the literature that warrant further research. We found significant findings regarding how vulnerable patient populations are affected by health inequities. Research should be conducted to investigate these inequities more thoroughly and discover the best solutions to bridge the gaps in providing equitable care.","PeriodicalId":50714,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503231210878","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Plastic surgery is routinely sought after for the treatment of breast cancer, cleft lip and palate, and gender-affirming care. Inequities exist in plastic surgery in regard to the epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes experienced by patients. The purpose of our scoping review was to (1) outline current literature addressing health inequities in plastic surgery and (2) draw attention to the gaps in this literature. Methods: This scoping review was developed following guidelines from the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. An initial search of MEDLINE (via PubMed), Ovid Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus databases was performed to locate published articles on health inequities in plastic surgery. Articles had to address at least one of the National Institutes of Health's inequity groups we examined. Results: After reviewing full text, 153 studies were included in our final sample. We found race/ethnicity (94/153) and age (90/153) to be the 2 most commonly evaluated inequities in the scoping review. We discovered that patient populations that were older had public or no insurance and/or were in historically marginalized racial/ethnic groups were often less likely to be offered plastic surgery treatments. Conclusion: This scoping review describes the current literature on health inequities in plastic surgery and highlights gaps in the literature that warrant further research. We found significant findings regarding how vulnerable patient populations are affected by health inequities. Research should be conducted to investigate these inequities more thoroughly and discover the best solutions to bridge the gaps in providing equitable care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流行病学、诊断、治疗和整形手术结果中的健康不平等:范围综述
背景:整形手术是治疗乳腺癌、唇腭裂和性别确认护理的常规方法。整形手术在流行病学、诊断、治疗和患者经历的结果方面存在不公平。我们的范围综述的目的是:(1)概述当前关于整形手术中健康不平等的文献,(2)提请注意这些文献中的空白。方法:本范围审查是根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所和PRISMA扩展范围审查的指导方针制定的。对MEDLINE(通过PubMed)、Ovid Embase、Cochrane系统评价数据库和Scopus数据库进行了初步搜索,以定位已发表的关于整形外科健康不平等的文章。文章必须涉及我们研究过的美国国立卫生研究院(National Institutes of Health)不平等群体中的至少一个。结果:在审查全文后,153项研究被纳入我们的最终样本。我们发现种族/民族(94/153)和年龄(90/153)是范围评估中最常评估的两个不公平因素。我们发现,年龄较大或没有公共保险和/或历史上处于边缘的种族/民族群体的患者通常不太可能接受整形手术治疗。结论:这篇范围综述描述了目前关于整形手术中健康不平等的文献,并强调了文献中值得进一步研究的空白。我们发现了关于弱势患者群体如何受到卫生不平等影响的重要发现。应开展研究,更彻底地调查这些不平等现象,并找出最佳解决办法,弥合在提供公平护理方面的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plastic Surgery
Plastic Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
0.67
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic Surgery (Chirurgie Plastique) is the official journal of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Group for the Advancement of Microsurgery, and the Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand. It serves as a major venue for Canadian research, society guidelines, and continuing medical education.
期刊最新文献
Accessibility and Insurance Coverage for Gender-affirming Surgery in Canada: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Donor Site Outcomes Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction with DIEP Flap: A Retrospective and Prospective Study in a Single Institution Commentary: Current Practices and Trends of Plastic and Oncoplastic Breast Surgeons in Canada Commentary: Instagram Practices of Successful Plastic Surgeon Accounts: Is There a Magic Formula? Out-of-Pocket Costs and Physician Payment Variations in Abdominal Contouring: Evidence From United States Claims Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1