Neither backlash nor convergence: dynamics of intra-couple childcare division during the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany

IF 1.6 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Journal for Labour Market Research Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI:10.1186/s12651-023-00353-8
Christina Boll, Dana Müller, Simone Schüller
{"title":"Neither backlash nor convergence: dynamics of intra-couple childcare division during the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany","authors":"Christina Boll, Dana Müller, Simone Schüller","doi":"10.1186/s12651-023-00353-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Using unique (bi)monthly panel data (IAB-HOPP) covering the immediate postlockdown period from June to August 2020, as well as the subsequent period up until the second lockdown in January/February 2021, we investigate opposing claims of widening/closing the gender gap in parental childcare during the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany. We consider prepandemic division as a reference point and provide dynamics rather than snapshots. Our results suggest a slight initial shift toward a more egalitarian division that, however, faded out in subsequent months. Starting from a fairly “traditional” prepandemic childcare division, the lockdown stimulus was not nearly strong enough to level the playing field. Subgroup analysis differentiating between individual lockdown-specific work arrangements shows that the drivers of the observed shift were mothers with relatively intense labor market participation who cannot work from home. Fathers’ work arrangement instead did not play a significant role. We conclude that the shift emerged out of necessity rather than opportunity, which makes it likely to fade once the necessity vanishes. Further, a shift is observed only if fathers were to some extent involved in childcare prepandemic, which points to the crucial role of initial conditions.","PeriodicalId":45469,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Labour Market Research","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Labour Market Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-023-00353-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Using unique (bi)monthly panel data (IAB-HOPP) covering the immediate postlockdown period from June to August 2020, as well as the subsequent period up until the second lockdown in January/February 2021, we investigate opposing claims of widening/closing the gender gap in parental childcare during the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany. We consider prepandemic division as a reference point and provide dynamics rather than snapshots. Our results suggest a slight initial shift toward a more egalitarian division that, however, faded out in subsequent months. Starting from a fairly “traditional” prepandemic childcare division, the lockdown stimulus was not nearly strong enough to level the playing field. Subgroup analysis differentiating between individual lockdown-specific work arrangements shows that the drivers of the observed shift were mothers with relatively intense labor market participation who cannot work from home. Fathers’ work arrangement instead did not play a significant role. We conclude that the shift emerged out of necessity rather than opportunity, which makes it likely to fade once the necessity vanishes. Further, a shift is observed only if fathers were to some extent involved in childcare prepandemic, which points to the crucial role of initial conditions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
既不反弹,也不趋同:新冠肺炎大流行期间德国夫妻之间育儿分工的动态
利用覆盖2020年6月至8月封市后以及随后直到2021年1月/ 2月第二次封市期间的唯一(双)月度面板数据(ab - hopp),我们调查了在德国Covid-19大流行期间扩大/缩小父母育儿方面性别差距的对立说法。我们将大流行前的划分视为参考点,并提供动态而非快照。我们的研究结果表明,最初出现了向更平等的划分的轻微转变,然而,在随后的几个月里,这种转变逐渐消失。从一个相当“传统”的流行病前儿童保育部门开始,封锁刺激措施远不足以创造公平的竞争环境。区分个别封锁具体工作安排的亚组分析表明,观察到的转变的驱动因素是劳动力市场参与度相对较高、无法在家工作的母亲。相反,父亲的工作安排并没有发挥重要作用。我们得出的结论是,这种转变是出于必要性而不是机遇,这使得它很可能在必要性消失后消失。此外,只有在父亲在某种程度上参与大流行前的儿童保育时,才会观察到这种转变,这表明初始条件的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Labour Market Research
Journal for Labour Market Research INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
17
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for Labour Market Research is a journal in the interdisciplinary field of labour market research. As of 2016 the Journal publishes Open Access. The journal follows international research standards and strives for international visibility. With its empirical and multidisciplinary orientation, the journal publishes papers in English language concerning the labour market, employment, education / training and careers. Papers dealing with country-specific labour market aspects are suitable if they adopt an innovative approach and address a topic of interest to a wider international audience. The journal is distinct from most others in the field, as it provides a platform for contributions from a broad range of academic disciplines. The editors encourage replication studies, as well as studies based on international comparisons. Accordingly, authors are expected to make their empirical data available to readers who might wish to replicate a published work on request. Submitted papers, who have passed a prescreening process by the editors, are generally reviewed by two peer reviewers, who remain anonymous for the author. In addition to the regular issues, special issues covering selected topics are published at least once a year. As of April 2015 the Journal for Labour Market Research has a "No Revisions" option for submissions (see ‘Instructions for Authors’).
期刊最新文献
Literature review of comparative school-to-work research: how institutional settings shape individual labour market outcomes The COVID-19 pandemic: a threat to higher education? Evidence from a large university in Northern Italy The response of labour demand to different COVID-19 containment measures: evidence from online job postings in Austria Continuing vocational training in times of economic uncertainty: an event-study analysis in real time Income and consumption inequality trends: a comparative analysis between paid employees and the self-employed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1