Rhesus factor is a stronger predictor for the risk of Sars-CoV-2 and mortality than ABO blood types

Soner Yesilyurt, Osman Erinc, Almila Senat, Cem Tugrul Gezmis, Mustafa Bahadir Can Balci
{"title":"Rhesus factor is a stronger predictor for the risk of Sars-CoV-2 and mortality than ABO blood types","authors":"Soner Yesilyurt, Osman Erinc, Almila Senat, Cem Tugrul Gezmis, Mustafa Bahadir Can Balci","doi":"10.1515/tjb-2023-0063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between ABO blood groups and Rhesus factor (Rf) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (Sars-CoV-2), as well as the risk of infection susceptibility and death according to pre-existing comorbidities. Methods This retrospective study included patients medical record between March 2020 and March 2021. A total 470 patients were included in the study. The subjects were categorized according to diagnose of Sars-CoV-2. Also, we evaluated the subject according to severity of Sars-CoV-2 infection. The logistic and multivariate regression analysis were performed to predict possible effect of ABO and Rf types as well as comorbidities on indicators of Sars-CoV-2 severity including Intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization, intubation, and mortality. Results The distribution of ABO blood type and Rf were not statistically different cases with and without Sars-CoV-2. Blood type B and A were the most groups in intubation and mortality among patients with Sars-CoV-2. However, ABO blood types had no significant effect on risk of Sars-CoV-2 and mortality while, Rf had a significantly effect on it. Additionally, Rf had a statistically significant effect on all severity indicators of Sars-CoV-2 but ABO had not. Conclusions While Rf was significantly associated with risk of Sars-CoV-2 and had a strong effect on ICU admission, intubation, and mortality, ABO groups were not associated with risk of disease. Intubation and mortality rates were higher in patients with blood group B (OR: 2.93 p:0.390 95 % CI [0.253–33.9], OR: 0.217 p:0.211 95 % CI [0.020–2.37]) and Rh factor + (OR: 1.63 p:0.027 95 % CI [0.046–0.828]).","PeriodicalId":92463,"journal":{"name":"Turk biyokimya dergisi = Turkish journal of biochemistry","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk biyokimya dergisi = Turkish journal of biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2023-0063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objectives In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between ABO blood groups and Rhesus factor (Rf) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (Sars-CoV-2), as well as the risk of infection susceptibility and death according to pre-existing comorbidities. Methods This retrospective study included patients medical record between March 2020 and March 2021. A total 470 patients were included in the study. The subjects were categorized according to diagnose of Sars-CoV-2. Also, we evaluated the subject according to severity of Sars-CoV-2 infection. The logistic and multivariate regression analysis were performed to predict possible effect of ABO and Rf types as well as comorbidities on indicators of Sars-CoV-2 severity including Intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization, intubation, and mortality. Results The distribution of ABO blood type and Rf were not statistically different cases with and without Sars-CoV-2. Blood type B and A were the most groups in intubation and mortality among patients with Sars-CoV-2. However, ABO blood types had no significant effect on risk of Sars-CoV-2 and mortality while, Rf had a significantly effect on it. Additionally, Rf had a statistically significant effect on all severity indicators of Sars-CoV-2 but ABO had not. Conclusions While Rf was significantly associated with risk of Sars-CoV-2 and had a strong effect on ICU admission, intubation, and mortality, ABO groups were not associated with risk of disease. Intubation and mortality rates were higher in patients with blood group B (OR: 2.93 p:0.390 95 % CI [0.253–33.9], OR: 0.217 p:0.211 95 % CI [0.020–2.37]) and Rh factor + (OR: 1.63 p:0.027 95 % CI [0.046–0.828]).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恒河因子比ABO血型更能预测Sars-CoV-2的风险和死亡率
摘要目的探讨ABO血型、恒河因子(Rhesus factor, Rf)与Sars-CoV-2之间的关系,以及根据已存在的合并症评估感染易感性和死亡风险。方法回顾性研究纳入2020年3月至2021年3月患者的病历。研究共纳入了470名患者。根据诊断的Sars-CoV-2对受试者进行分类。此外,我们根据Sars-CoV-2感染的严重程度对受试者进行评估。通过logistic和多因素回归分析,预测ABO和Rf类型以及合并症对重症监护病房(ICU)住院、插管和死亡率等Sars-CoV-2严重程度指标的可能影响。结果ABO血型和Rf分布与非Sars-CoV-2患者无统计学差异。B型血和A型血是Sars-CoV-2患者插管率和死亡率最高的组。ABO血型对Sars-CoV-2感染风险和死亡率无显著影响,Rf血型对Sars-CoV-2感染风险和死亡率有显著影响。此外,Rf对Sars-CoV-2的所有严重程度指标均有统计学意义,而ABO无统计学意义。结论:虽然Rf与Sars-CoV-2风险显著相关,并且对ICU入院、插管和死亡率有很强的影响,但ABO血型与疾病风险无关。B血型患者插管率和死亡率较高(OR: 2.93 p:0.390 95% CI [0.253-33.9], OR: 0.217 p:0.211 95% CI[0.020-2.37])和Rh因子+患者(OR: 1.63 p:0.027 95% CI[0.046-0.828])。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cloning and in silico investigation of a putative voltage-gated calcium channel gene and protein in Astacus Leptodactylus Time to treat the climate and nature crisis as one indivisible global health emergency Postconditioning with D-limonene exerts neuroprotection in rats via enhancing mitochondrial activity Comparison of the immunoassay method with the commercial and in-house LC-MS/MS methods for substance abuse in urine The relationship between ASIC3 gene polymorphism and fibromyalgia syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1