A cross-sectional study: exploring the relationship between commuting time and subjective wellbeing in the UAE

IF 2.2 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Frontiers in Built Environment Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI:10.3389/fbuil.2023.1257198
Hira Abdul Razzak, Amin ElShamy, Alya Harbi, Mubarkah AlKarbi, Lubna Al Shaali, Rasha Salama, Ahmed Alosi, Haifa H. N. Madi
{"title":"A cross-sectional study: exploring the relationship between commuting time and subjective wellbeing in the UAE","authors":"Hira Abdul Razzak, Amin ElShamy, Alya Harbi, Mubarkah AlKarbi, Lubna Al Shaali, Rasha Salama, Ahmed Alosi, Haifa H. N. Madi","doi":"10.3389/fbuil.2023.1257198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Commuting has become an integral part of modern life, impacting individuals’ daily routines and overall wellbeing. The duration of commuting has been recognized as important determinants of subjective wellbeing, with potential implications for public health. Aim: To examine the association between commuting time and subjective wellbeing across the seven emirates of the UAE. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on adults aged 18 years and above, encompassing both officially employed and self-employed individuals in the UAE. The sample of 5,476 participants was randomly selected from the population across the seven Emirates. To assess subjective wellbeing, the WHO-5 instrument, available in 31 languages and known for its ease of completion, scoring, and interpretation, was employed. Both Arabic and English versions of the tool were provided to the participants. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between commuting time and wellbeing, while controlling for individual, social, economic, and environmental factors. The adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated to determine the association with poor wellbeing. Results: The commuting time was associated with a higher odds ratio (OR) of experiencing poor subjective wellbeing. This association remained consistent even after accounting for individual, social, economic, and environmental factors in the analysis models. Among employees with commuting times greater than 60 min, the adjusted OR of poor subjective wellbeing was 2.24 (95% CI, 1.82–2.77) times higher compared to individuals with less than 15 min of commuting time. Similarly, for employees with commuting times between 31 and 60 min, the adjusted OR of poor subjective wellbeing was 1.7 (95% CI, 1.39–2.09) times higher, while for those with commuting times between 15 and 30 min, the adjusted OR was 1.26 (95% CI, 1.04–1.53) times higher, both compared to individuals with less than 15 min of commuting time. Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that commuting time plays a crucial role in determining the subjective wellbeing of employees in the UAE. Specifically, employees with longer commuting times tend to report lower levels of subjective wellbeing. This suggests a potential opportunity to implement policies aimed at reducing commuting durations, which could ultimately enhance the wellbeing of the employed workforce. Such measures have the potential to positively impact the mental wellbeing of employees in the United Arab Emirates.","PeriodicalId":37112,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Built Environment","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2023.1257198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Commuting has become an integral part of modern life, impacting individuals’ daily routines and overall wellbeing. The duration of commuting has been recognized as important determinants of subjective wellbeing, with potential implications for public health. Aim: To examine the association between commuting time and subjective wellbeing across the seven emirates of the UAE. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on adults aged 18 years and above, encompassing both officially employed and self-employed individuals in the UAE. The sample of 5,476 participants was randomly selected from the population across the seven Emirates. To assess subjective wellbeing, the WHO-5 instrument, available in 31 languages and known for its ease of completion, scoring, and interpretation, was employed. Both Arabic and English versions of the tool were provided to the participants. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between commuting time and wellbeing, while controlling for individual, social, economic, and environmental factors. The adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated to determine the association with poor wellbeing. Results: The commuting time was associated with a higher odds ratio (OR) of experiencing poor subjective wellbeing. This association remained consistent even after accounting for individual, social, economic, and environmental factors in the analysis models. Among employees with commuting times greater than 60 min, the adjusted OR of poor subjective wellbeing was 2.24 (95% CI, 1.82–2.77) times higher compared to individuals with less than 15 min of commuting time. Similarly, for employees with commuting times between 31 and 60 min, the adjusted OR of poor subjective wellbeing was 1.7 (95% CI, 1.39–2.09) times higher, while for those with commuting times between 15 and 30 min, the adjusted OR was 1.26 (95% CI, 1.04–1.53) times higher, both compared to individuals with less than 15 min of commuting time. Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that commuting time plays a crucial role in determining the subjective wellbeing of employees in the UAE. Specifically, employees with longer commuting times tend to report lower levels of subjective wellbeing. This suggests a potential opportunity to implement policies aimed at reducing commuting durations, which could ultimately enhance the wellbeing of the employed workforce. Such measures have the potential to positively impact the mental wellbeing of employees in the United Arab Emirates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
横断面研究:探索阿联酋通勤时间与主观幸福感之间的关系
背景:通勤已经成为现代生活中不可或缺的一部分,影响着个人的日常生活和整体健康。通勤时间被认为是主观幸福感的重要决定因素,对公共健康有潜在影响。目的:研究阿联酋七个酋长国的通勤时间与主观幸福感之间的关系。方法:对18岁及以上的成年人进行横断面调查,包括阿联酋的正式就业和自雇人士。5476名参与者的样本是从七个酋长国的人口中随机抽取的。为了评估主观幸福感,采用了世卫组织5号工具,该工具有31种语言版本,以易于完成、评分和解释而闻名。向与会者提供了该工具的阿拉伯文和英文本。在控制个人、社会、经济和环境因素的情况下,采用Logistic回归分析探讨通勤时间与幸福感的关系。计算调整后的优势比(aORs)以确定与不良幸福感的关联。结果:通勤时间与主观幸福感较差的比值比(OR)较高相关。即使在分析模型中考虑了个人、社会、经济和环境因素之后,这种联系仍然是一致的。在通勤时间大于60分钟的员工中,主观幸福感差的调整比值比通勤时间小于15分钟的员工高2.24倍(95% CI, 1.82-2.77)。同样,对于通勤时间在31 - 60分钟之间的员工,主观幸福感差的调整OR是通勤时间少于15分钟的员工的1.7倍(95% CI, 1.39-2.09),而对于通勤时间在15 - 30分钟之间的员工,调整OR是1.26倍(95% CI, 1.04-1.53)。结论:本研究结果表明,通勤时间在决定阿联酋员工的主观幸福感方面起着至关重要的作用。具体来说,通勤时间较长的员工往往报告的主观幸福感水平较低。这表明,实施旨在减少通勤时间的政策是一个潜在的机会,这可能最终提高就业劳动力的福祉。这些措施有可能对阿拉伯联合酋长国员工的心理健康产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Built Environment
Frontiers in Built Environment Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
266
期刊最新文献
A case study on the implementation of location tracking technologies for productivity monitoring: understanding workers’ acceptance and socio-technical implications A computational approach for categorizing street segments in urban street networks based on topological properties Ground response of rolling dynamic compaction—a finite element modelling approach Adapting to climate change: snow load assessment of snow galleries on the Iron Ore Line in Northern Sweden Combination of cellulose nanofiber and artificial fusion protein for biocementation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1