Facilitative Teaching Utilizing Active Learning Modules in Engineering Graphics: A Model for Promoting Success and Engagement in Technology and Engineering Education

Q3 Social Sciences Journal of Technology Education Pub Date : 2023-01-27 DOI:10.21061/jte.v34i1.a.3
Erik J. Schettig, Daniel P. Kelly, Jeremy V. Ernst, Aaron C. Clark
{"title":"Facilitative Teaching Utilizing Active Learning Modules in Engineering Graphics: A Model for Promoting Success and Engagement in Technology and Engineering Education","authors":"Erik J. Schettig, Daniel P. Kelly, Jeremy V. Ernst, Aaron C. Clark","doi":"10.21061/jte.v34i1.a.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Success in post-secondary engineering graphics courses in technology andengineering often relies on self-efficacy, academic success, and mental rotationabilities. Using a facilitative instructor model, the Improving UndergraduateSTEM Education (IUSE) team applied active learning modules as supplementalmaterial at two post-secondary institutions in the United States of America, thenused a quasi-experimental design iterative study approach to investigate impactsin an introductory engineering graphics course. Active learning modules werecomposed of ten units that engaged students through relatable examples andpractices of foundational principles and applications of engineering graphics thatare heavily applicable to the Standards for Technological and EngineeringLiteracy. The modules were presented to students through an online learningmanagement system that encouraged elements of self-regulated learning.Measurements of self-efficacy, mental rotation ability, and academic successwere gathered. Differences in academic and non-academic indicators wereexamined in combination with students at risk of non-matriculation and studentsnot at risk of non-matriculation subgroups. Results from paired t-tests supportedprevious findings that there are positive impacts of supplemental materialsavailable to students. Students at risk of non-matriculation benefited from thecombination of active learning modules and supplementary video tutorialsresulting in greater self-efficacy and higher final exam scores than at-riskstudents whose modules did not include video tutorials. Students not at risk ofnon-matriculation had higher levels of self-efficacy and mental rotation abilitywhen video tutorials were not included. With this information, engineering,engineering education, and other STEM programs can model elements of activelearning modules to promote early student success in both subgroups.Furthermore, the IUSE team has published the material through open access foreducators and students to utilize.","PeriodicalId":39755,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Technology Education","volume":"315 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v34i1.a.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Success in post-secondary engineering graphics courses in technology andengineering often relies on self-efficacy, academic success, and mental rotationabilities. Using a facilitative instructor model, the Improving UndergraduateSTEM Education (IUSE) team applied active learning modules as supplementalmaterial at two post-secondary institutions in the United States of America, thenused a quasi-experimental design iterative study approach to investigate impactsin an introductory engineering graphics course. Active learning modules werecomposed of ten units that engaged students through relatable examples andpractices of foundational principles and applications of engineering graphics thatare heavily applicable to the Standards for Technological and EngineeringLiteracy. The modules were presented to students through an online learningmanagement system that encouraged elements of self-regulated learning.Measurements of self-efficacy, mental rotation ability, and academic successwere gathered. Differences in academic and non-academic indicators wereexamined in combination with students at risk of non-matriculation and studentsnot at risk of non-matriculation subgroups. Results from paired t-tests supportedprevious findings that there are positive impacts of supplemental materialsavailable to students. Students at risk of non-matriculation benefited from thecombination of active learning modules and supplementary video tutorialsresulting in greater self-efficacy and higher final exam scores than at-riskstudents whose modules did not include video tutorials. Students not at risk ofnon-matriculation had higher levels of self-efficacy and mental rotation abilitywhen video tutorials were not included. With this information, engineering,engineering education, and other STEM programs can model elements of activelearning modules to promote early student success in both subgroups.Furthermore, the IUSE team has published the material through open access foreducators and students to utilize.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在工程图学中利用主动学习模块的促进教学:促进技术和工程教育成功和参与的模式
在技术和工程领域的高等教育工程制图课程中取得成功通常依赖于自我效能感、学业成就和心理旋转能力。改进本科stem教育(IUSE)团队采用促进讲师模型,在美国的两所大专院校应用主动学习模块作为补充材料,然后使用准实验设计迭代研究方法来调查工程图学入门课程的影响。主动学习模块由十个单元组成,通过相关的例子和基本原理的实践以及工程图形的应用来吸引学生,这些基本原理和应用非常适用于技术和工程素养标准。这些模块通过在线学习管理系统呈现给学生,该系统鼓励自我调节学习的要素。收集了自我效能、心理旋转能力和学业成功的测量结果。学术和非学术指标的差异与有非入学风险的学生和没有非入学风险的学生亚组相结合进行了检查。配对t检验的结果支持了先前的发现,即学生可获得的补充材料有积极的影响。有可能无法入学的学生受益于主动学习模块和补充视频教程的结合,结果比那些模块不包括视频教程的有风险的学生有更高的自我效能感和更高的期末考试成绩。在没有视频辅导的情况下,没有未被录取风险的学生有更高水平的自我效能感和心理旋转能力。有了这些信息,工程、工程教育和其他STEM项目可以对主动学习模块的元素进行建模,以促进学生在这两个小组中的早期成功。此外,IUSE团队还通过开放获取的方式发布了这些材料,供教育者和学生使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Technology Education
Journal of Technology Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Technology Education provides a forum for scholarly discussion on topics relating to technology education. Manuscripts should focus on technology education research, philosophy, and theory. In addition, the Journal publishes book reviews, editorials, guest articles, comprehensive literature reviews, and reactions to previously published articles.
期刊最新文献
Changes in Students’ Design-Thinking Mindsets after Design-Based Learning with Respect to Gender and Prior Experiences in Design&nbsp; 33 Years of the <em>JTE</em>: Visioning Forward Embracing Computational Thinking as an Impetus for Artificial Intelligence in Integrated STEM Disciplines through Engineering and Technology Education&nbsp; Miscellany Embedding Safety in Integrative STEM Teaching Methods Courses for Pre-Service Elementary Teachers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1