Studi komparasi model guided discovery learning dan model problem based learning terhadap kemampuan berpikir analitis siswa pada mata pelajaran geografi
Rissa Permata Sari, Fatiya Rosyida, Hadi Soekamto, I Komang Astina, Eka Anita Putri
{"title":"Studi komparasi model guided discovery learning dan model problem based learning terhadap kemampuan berpikir analitis siswa pada mata pelajaran geografi","authors":"Rissa Permata Sari, Fatiya Rosyida, Hadi Soekamto, I Komang Astina, Eka Anita Putri","doi":"10.17977/um063v3i8p859-870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine differences in students' analytical thinking abilities using the Guided Discovery Learning model and the Problem-Based Learning Model in Geography subjects in high school. The ability to think analytically is essential for students in learning geography because it is needed to analyze the spatial relations of a phenomenon. Discovery activities in this study made students gain new knowledge. The research is in the form of a quasi-experiment in the form of a posttest-only control group design. This research was conducted at SMAN 4 Malang with a sample of X IPS 3 (experiment 1) and X IPS 4 (experiment 2) in the odd semester of 2022/2023. Measurement of analytical thinking ability through a description test according to indicators of analytical thinking ability. The data analysis technique used the t-test, previously, the prerequisite tests were carried out, namely the normality and homogeneity tests. The results showed that there were differences in students' analytical thinking skills using the Guided Discovery Learning model and the Problem-Based Learning model. This was indicated by the Sig. hypothesis test of 0.001 less than 0.05. The Guided Discovery Learning model is better than the Problem-Based Learning Model for students' analytical thinking skills. This is evidenced by the average posttest score of experimental class 1, which received the learning treatment with the Guided Discovery Learning Model of 80.58. While practical class 2 which received the learning treatment with the Problem-Based Learning Model, obtained an average score of 72.71. Several factors influenced the average value of analytical thinking skills in experimental class 1 to be higher than in practical class 2, namely the success of students in solving geographic problems through group investigations in the Guided Discovery Learning model and the aid of the learning media used, namely Sparkol Video scribe. The application of the Guided Discovery Learning model and the Problem-Based Learning Model requires a long time. Therefore, proper preparation and time management are required before implementation.
 Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan berpikir analitis siswa dengan menggunakan model Guided Discovery Learning dan Model Problem Based Learning pada mata pelajaran Geografi di SMA. Kemampuan berpikir analitis penting dimiliki siswa dalam pembelajaran geografi karena dibutuhkan untuk menganalisis relasi keruangan dari suatu fenomena. Kegiatan penemuan dalam penelitian ini membuat siswa mendapatkan pengetahuan baru. Penelitian berupa quasi experiment bentuk posttest only control group design. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di SMAN 4 Malang dengan sampel X IPS 3 (eksperimen 1) dan X IPS 4 (eksperimen 2) pada semester ganjil 2022/2023. Pengukuran kemampuan berpikir analitis melalui tes uraian sesuai dengan indikator kemampuan berpikir analitis. Teknik analisis data menggunakan uji-t, sebelumnya dilakukan uji prasyarat yaitu uji normalitas dan homogenitas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan kemampuan berpikir analitis siswa dengan menggunakan model Guided Discovery Learning dan Model Problem Based Learning, hal ini ditunjukan dengan nilai Sig. uji hipotesis sebesar 0,001 kurang dari 0,05. Model Guided Discovery Learning lebih baik dibandingkan Model Problem Based Learning terhadap kemampuan berpikir analitis siswa. Hal ini dibuktikan dengan rata-rata nilai posttest kelas eksperimen 1 yang mendapat perlakuan pembelajaran dengan Model Guided Discovery Learning sebesar 80,58. Sedangkan kelas eksperimen 2 yang mendapatkan perlakuan pembelajaran dengan Model Problem Based Learning memperoleh rata-rata nilai sebesar 72,71. Beberapa faktor yang mempengaruhi rata-rata nilai kemampuan berpikir analitis kelas eksperimen 1 lebih tinggi daripada kelas eksperimen 2 adalah keberhasilan siswa dalam memecahkan permasalahan geografi melalui penyelidikan kelompok pada model Guided Discovery Learning dan bantuan media pembelajaran yang diterapkan yaitu Sparkol Videoscribe. Penerapan model Guided Discovery Learning dan Model Problem Based Learning memerlukan waktu yang lama. Maka dari itu diperlukan persiapan dan pengelolaan waktu yang baik sebelum diimplementasikan.","PeriodicalId":36433,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17977/um063v3i8p859-870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aims to determine differences in students' analytical thinking abilities using the Guided Discovery Learning model and the Problem-Based Learning Model in Geography subjects in high school. The ability to think analytically is essential for students in learning geography because it is needed to analyze the spatial relations of a phenomenon. Discovery activities in this study made students gain new knowledge. The research is in the form of a quasi-experiment in the form of a posttest-only control group design. This research was conducted at SMAN 4 Malang with a sample of X IPS 3 (experiment 1) and X IPS 4 (experiment 2) in the odd semester of 2022/2023. Measurement of analytical thinking ability through a description test according to indicators of analytical thinking ability. The data analysis technique used the t-test, previously, the prerequisite tests were carried out, namely the normality and homogeneity tests. The results showed that there were differences in students' analytical thinking skills using the Guided Discovery Learning model and the Problem-Based Learning model. This was indicated by the Sig. hypothesis test of 0.001 less than 0.05. The Guided Discovery Learning model is better than the Problem-Based Learning Model for students' analytical thinking skills. This is evidenced by the average posttest score of experimental class 1, which received the learning treatment with the Guided Discovery Learning Model of 80.58. While practical class 2 which received the learning treatment with the Problem-Based Learning Model, obtained an average score of 72.71. Several factors influenced the average value of analytical thinking skills in experimental class 1 to be higher than in practical class 2, namely the success of students in solving geographic problems through group investigations in the Guided Discovery Learning model and the aid of the learning media used, namely Sparkol Video scribe. The application of the Guided Discovery Learning model and the Problem-Based Learning Model requires a long time. Therefore, proper preparation and time management are required before implementation.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan berpikir analitis siswa dengan menggunakan model Guided Discovery Learning dan Model Problem Based Learning pada mata pelajaran Geografi di SMA. Kemampuan berpikir analitis penting dimiliki siswa dalam pembelajaran geografi karena dibutuhkan untuk menganalisis relasi keruangan dari suatu fenomena. Kegiatan penemuan dalam penelitian ini membuat siswa mendapatkan pengetahuan baru. Penelitian berupa quasi experiment bentuk posttest only control group design. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di SMAN 4 Malang dengan sampel X IPS 3 (eksperimen 1) dan X IPS 4 (eksperimen 2) pada semester ganjil 2022/2023. Pengukuran kemampuan berpikir analitis melalui tes uraian sesuai dengan indikator kemampuan berpikir analitis. Teknik analisis data menggunakan uji-t, sebelumnya dilakukan uji prasyarat yaitu uji normalitas dan homogenitas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan kemampuan berpikir analitis siswa dengan menggunakan model Guided Discovery Learning dan Model Problem Based Learning, hal ini ditunjukan dengan nilai Sig. uji hipotesis sebesar 0,001 kurang dari 0,05. Model Guided Discovery Learning lebih baik dibandingkan Model Problem Based Learning terhadap kemampuan berpikir analitis siswa. Hal ini dibuktikan dengan rata-rata nilai posttest kelas eksperimen 1 yang mendapat perlakuan pembelajaran dengan Model Guided Discovery Learning sebesar 80,58. Sedangkan kelas eksperimen 2 yang mendapatkan perlakuan pembelajaran dengan Model Problem Based Learning memperoleh rata-rata nilai sebesar 72,71. Beberapa faktor yang mempengaruhi rata-rata nilai kemampuan berpikir analitis kelas eksperimen 1 lebih tinggi daripada kelas eksperimen 2 adalah keberhasilan siswa dalam memecahkan permasalahan geografi melalui penyelidikan kelompok pada model Guided Discovery Learning dan bantuan media pembelajaran yang diterapkan yaitu Sparkol Videoscribe. Penerapan model Guided Discovery Learning dan Model Problem Based Learning memerlukan waktu yang lama. Maka dari itu diperlukan persiapan dan pengelolaan waktu yang baik sebelum diimplementasikan.
本研究旨在探讨在高中地理学科中使用引导性发现学习模式和基于问题的学习模式对学生分析思维能力的影响。分析思考的能力对学生学习地理是必不可少的,因为它需要分析一个现象的空间关系。本研究中的发现活动使学生获得了新的知识。本研究采用准实验的形式,采用仅后测的对照组设计。本研究于2022/2023单学期在玛琅sman4进行,样品为X IPS 3(实验1)和X IPS 4(实验2)。根据分析思维能力的指标,通过描述测试来衡量分析思维能力。数据分析技术采用t检验,之前进行了前提检验,即正态性检验和齐性检验。结果表明,使用引导性发现学习模式和基于问题的学习模式,学生的分析思维能力存在差异。这是通过0.001小于0.05的sig假设检验来表明的。在培养学生的分析思维能力方面,引导性发现学习模式优于基于问题的学习模式。实验1班接受引导式发现学习模式的学习处理,后测平均分为80.58。实践2班采用基于问题的学习模式进行学习处理,平均成绩为72.71分。影响实验1班学生分析思维能力平均值高于实践2班学生分析思维能力平均值的因素有:导导式发现学习模式下学生通过小组调查解决地理问题的成功程度,以及使用Sparkol Video scribe学习媒体的帮助。引导式发现学习模式和基于问题的学习模式的应用需要很长的时间。因此,在实施之前需要进行适当的准备和时间管理。
基于问题的学习模型和基于问题的学习模型[j] .中国地理学报。Kemampuan berpikir分析,penbelajan地理学karena dibutuhkan untuk menganalis relasi keruangan dari suatu现象。Kegiatan penemuan dalam penelitian ini成员,siswa mendapatkan pengetahuan baru。Penelitian berupa准实验本图克仅后测对照组设计。马朗登根样品X IPS 3(实验1)和X IPS 4(实验2),于2022/2023年1月1日学期完成。企鹅与企鹅的关系是企鹅与企鹅的关系,是企鹅与企鹅的关系。技术分析数据:menggunakan uji-t, sebelumnya dilakukan uji prasyarat yitu uji normalitas and homoitas。[8]李建平,李建平,李建平,等。基于问题的学习模型,基于问题的学习模型,基于问题的学习模型,李建平,等。模型导向的发现学习(Model Guided Discovery Learning)。[1] [j] [j] .科学通报,1999,8(2):1 - 2。[2][中文].基于问题的学习模型[m] .中文],[j] .北京:北京大学学报(自然科学版)。中文翻译为:中文翻译为:中文翻译为:中文翻译为:中文翻译为:中文翻译为:中文翻译为:中文翻译为:中文翻译为:中文翻译为:中文翻译为:中文翻译为:中文翻译为:中文翻译为:中文翻译为:中文翻译为:中文翻译为:中文翻译为:中文翻译为:中文翻译为:中文翻译为:中文翻译为:中文翻译为:Penerapan模型引导发现学习和模型基于问题的学习。Maka dari to diperlukan peran danpenelolaan waktu yang baik sebelum diimplementasikan。