Glosa do Uchwały Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego z dnia 27 marca 2023 r., sygn. akt I FPS 2/22

Piotr Pietrasz, Dominik Kościuk
{"title":"Glosa do Uchwały Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego z dnia 27 marca 2023 r., sygn. akt I FPS 2/22","authors":"Piotr Pietrasz, Dominik Kościuk","doi":"10.31268/ps.2023.203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The judgement of the Supreme Administrative Court referred to in the document relates to the issue of the statute of limitations of a tax liability, which is a construction of tax law. The legal question that raised serious doubts in a specific case was whether tax law is part of administrative law or constitutes a separate branch of law. The problem arose in connection with Article 15zzr(1)(3) of the COVID-19 Act. The result of the analysis confirms the thesis that the statute of limitations on tax liabilities cannot be regulated by provisions of administrative law, as tax law does not fall within the category of administrative law but constitutes a separate branch of law.","PeriodicalId":177756,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Sejmowy","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Sejmowy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2023.203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The judgement of the Supreme Administrative Court referred to in the document relates to the issue of the statute of limitations of a tax liability, which is a construction of tax law. The legal question that raised serious doubts in a specific case was whether tax law is part of administrative law or constitutes a separate branch of law. The problem arose in connection with Article 15zzr(1)(3) of the COVID-19 Act. The result of the analysis confirms the thesis that the statute of limitations on tax liabilities cannot be regulated by provisions of administrative law, as tax law does not fall within the category of administrative law but constitutes a separate branch of law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gloss to the Resolution of the Supreme Administrative Court of 27 March 2023, ref.
文件中提到的最高行政法院的判决涉及税收责任的诉讼时效问题,这是税法的一个建构。在具体案件中引起严重怀疑的法律问题是,税法是行政法的一部分还是构成一个单独的法律部门。该问题与《COVID-19法》第15zzr(1)(3)条有关。分析的结果证实了这一论点,即税收责任的时效不能由行政法的规定来规定,因为税法不属于行政法的范畴,而是一个单独的法律分支。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Niekonstytucyjność embriopatologicznej przesłanki przerywania ciąży oraz jej prawnokarne konsekwencje Profesorowie uniwersyteccy w parlamencie II Rzeczypospolitej – portret zbiorowy Kulisy interpelacji posłów Związku Ludowo-Narodowego z dnia 8 listopada 1921 r. w sprawie likwidacji placówek wojskowo-dyplomatycznych Zasada tajności głosowania w wyborach do Sejmu PRL I kadencji z 26 października 1952 r. Lex TVN. Przebieg debaty publicznej
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1