Comparative evaluation of novel chelating agents for retrievability of intracanal calcium hydroxide using different irrigation protocols: An in vitro study

Q3 Dentistry Endodontology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/endo.endo_253_22
Mansi Behl, Sonali Taneja, Vidhi Kiran Bhalla
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of novel chelating agents for retrievability of intracanal calcium hydroxide using different irrigation protocols: An in vitro study","authors":"Mansi Behl, Sonali Taneja, Vidhi Kiran Bhalla","doi":"10.4103/endo.endo_253_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Aim: The aim of the study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of glycolic acid (GA), phytic acid, chitosan nanoparticles, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for the removal of intracanal calcium hydroxide (Ca [OH] 2 ) dressing using needle irrigation and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI). Materials and Methods: Seventy-two mandibular premolars were decoronated and roots were prepared to apical size 30. Ca(OH) 2 paste was filled in the canals and samples were stored for 1 week after which they were irrigated using different irrigants and irrigation techniques. The residual Ca(OH) 2 was analyzed on split surface of samples under stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope. Scoring was done for each sample and results were tabulated. The data were subjected to analysis using Mann–Whitney U-test with the level of significance set to 5%. Results: Removal of Ca(OH) 2 was maximum in chitosan group aided by PUI and was minimum when GA or EDTA was used for needle irrigation, as observed under stereomicroscope. Removal of Ca(OH) 2 from the coronal third was maximum followed by middle and then apical third. Phytic acid and chitosan were proven to be of maximum efficacy for removal of intracanal Ca(OH) 2 removal in the middle third among all the groups, especially when used with PUI. Needle irrigation using EDTA and GA was least efficacious. Conclusion: Chitosan and phytic acid can be used for better removal of Ca(OH) 2 dressing, especially in the coronal and middle thirds of the root canal. The efficacy of intracanal dressing retrieval can be enhanced by passive ultrasonic activation.","PeriodicalId":11607,"journal":{"name":"Endodontology","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_253_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim: The aim of the study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of glycolic acid (GA), phytic acid, chitosan nanoparticles, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for the removal of intracanal calcium hydroxide (Ca [OH] 2 ) dressing using needle irrigation and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI). Materials and Methods: Seventy-two mandibular premolars were decoronated and roots were prepared to apical size 30. Ca(OH) 2 paste was filled in the canals and samples were stored for 1 week after which they were irrigated using different irrigants and irrigation techniques. The residual Ca(OH) 2 was analyzed on split surface of samples under stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope. Scoring was done for each sample and results were tabulated. The data were subjected to analysis using Mann–Whitney U-test with the level of significance set to 5%. Results: Removal of Ca(OH) 2 was maximum in chitosan group aided by PUI and was minimum when GA or EDTA was used for needle irrigation, as observed under stereomicroscope. Removal of Ca(OH) 2 from the coronal third was maximum followed by middle and then apical third. Phytic acid and chitosan were proven to be of maximum efficacy for removal of intracanal Ca(OH) 2 removal in the middle third among all the groups, especially when used with PUI. Needle irrigation using EDTA and GA was least efficacious. Conclusion: Chitosan and phytic acid can be used for better removal of Ca(OH) 2 dressing, especially in the coronal and middle thirds of the root canal. The efficacy of intracanal dressing retrieval can be enhanced by passive ultrasonic activation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型螯合剂对不同灌洗方式下管内氢氧化钙回收性的比较评价:一项体外研究
摘要目的:评价并比较乙醇酸(GA)、植酸、壳聚糖纳米颗粒和乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)在针灌和被动超声灌洗(PUI)去除管内氢氧化钙(Ca [OH] 2)敷料中的效果。材料与方法:对72颗下颌前磨牙进行整饰,预备根尖大小为30。Ca(OH) 2膏体填充于根管中,样品保存1周后,使用不同的冲洗剂和灌溉技术进行冲洗。在体视显微镜和扫描电镜下分析了样品劈裂表面残留的Ca(OH) 2。对每个样本进行评分,并将结果制成表格。数据采用Mann-Whitney u检验进行分析,显著性水平设为5%。结果:体视显微镜下观察,PUI辅助壳聚糖组对Ca(OH) 2的去除效果最大,GA或EDTA针灌组对Ca(OH) 2的去除效果最小。Ca(OH) 2从冠状三分之一去除最多,其次是中间和根尖三分之一。植酸和壳聚糖被证明对去除管内Ca(OH) 2的效果最大,在所有组中占中间三分之一,特别是当与PUI一起使用时。EDTA和GA针刺冲洗效果最差。结论:壳聚糖和植酸能较好地去除根管中Ca(OH) 2敷料,特别是冠状和中三分之一根管。被动超声激活可提高肛内敷料回收的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endodontology
Endodontology Medicine-Anatomy
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative evaluation of the clinical and radiographic success of regenerative endodontic procedures in immature versus mature permanent incisors with apical periodontitis: A prospective observational study Sealing efficacy of various rubber dam barrier materials used for isolation procedures: A randomized controlled trial Evaluation of fracture resistance of radicular dentin treated with nanochitosan-loaded calcium hydroxide and nanographene-loaded calcium hydroxide, when used as intracanal medicament: An in vitro study Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars using indirect and direct composite onlays: A comparative study Effect of bonding pericervical dentin with reinforcing materials on strength of root-filled mandibular single-canal premolars: An in vitro study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1