Complication rates associated with traction removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes

Georgina Melling, Joshua Farley
{"title":"Complication rates associated with traction removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes","authors":"Georgina Melling, Joshua Farley","doi":"10.12968/gasn.2023.21.sup8.s16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are removed and/or replaced for reasons such as tube malfunction, degradation, patient's device preference, and when stopping enteral feeding. Aims: to identify the types and rate of complications associated with traction removal of a PEG tube and if this is associated with the size of the PEG or length of time it had been in situ prior to removal. Methods: This retrospective study looked at the tube removal/replacement reports written by the Enteral Feeding Nursing Service over an 8-year period at a large teaching hospital trust in the north of England. Findings: the PEG tube removal reports of 127 patients were reviewed. Five types of complication were identified, categorised as retained bumper (5.5%); intraperitoneal placement of new device (3.17%); misplacement of replacement device into colon (a consequence of the insertion procedure not the removal of the PEG) (0.78%): gastrocutaneous fistula (0.78%); and inability to remove the tube (1.57%). The complication of retained bumpers was associated with an average length of time in situ prior to removal of the PEG tube of 29 months. In the cases of intraperitoneal placement, the PEG tube had been in situ for an average of 6 months. Nurses were unable to remove the PEG tube on two occasions; each had been in situ for approximately 4 years prior to attempted removal. Conclusion: the complication rates are low following removal of a PEG tube using a traction pull. There was no clear correlation between length of time in situ or tube size and complication rate.","PeriodicalId":52494,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal Nursing","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/gasn.2023.21.sup8.s16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are removed and/or replaced for reasons such as tube malfunction, degradation, patient's device preference, and when stopping enteral feeding. Aims: to identify the types and rate of complications associated with traction removal of a PEG tube and if this is associated with the size of the PEG or length of time it had been in situ prior to removal. Methods: This retrospective study looked at the tube removal/replacement reports written by the Enteral Feeding Nursing Service over an 8-year period at a large teaching hospital trust in the north of England. Findings: the PEG tube removal reports of 127 patients were reviewed. Five types of complication were identified, categorised as retained bumper (5.5%); intraperitoneal placement of new device (3.17%); misplacement of replacement device into colon (a consequence of the insertion procedure not the removal of the PEG) (0.78%): gastrocutaneous fistula (0.78%); and inability to remove the tube (1.57%). The complication of retained bumpers was associated with an average length of time in situ prior to removal of the PEG tube of 29 months. In the cases of intraperitoneal placement, the PEG tube had been in situ for an average of 6 months. Nurses were unable to remove the PEG tube on two occasions; each had been in situ for approximately 4 years prior to attempted removal. Conclusion: the complication rates are low following removal of a PEG tube using a traction pull. There was no clear correlation between length of time in situ or tube size and complication rate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮内镜下胃造口管牵引拔除的并发症发生率
背景:经皮内镜胃造口术(PEG)管因管故障、降解、患者设备偏好和停止肠内喂养等原因被移除和/或更换。目的:确定与牵引拔除PEG管相关的并发症的类型和发生率,以及这是否与PEG的大小或其在原位拔除前的时间长度有关。方法:本回顾性研究回顾了英格兰北部一家大型教学医院8年来由肠内喂养护理服务撰写的拔管/更换报告。结果:回顾了127例患者的PEG管拔除报告。确定了5种并发症类型,分类为保留缓冲器(5.5%);腹腔内放置新装置(3.17%);替换装置植入结肠(插入手术的结果,而不是移除PEG的结果)(0.78%):胃皮瘘(0.78%);无法取出输卵管(1.57%)。保留缓冲器的并发症与去除PEG管前在原位的平均时间为29个月有关。在腹腔内放置的情况下,PEG管在原位平均放置6个月。护士两次无法取出PEG管;在试图移除之前,每个都在原地大约4年。结论:采用牵引牵引拔除PEG管后并发症发生率低。原位放置时间和导管大小与并发症发生率无明显相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal Nursing
Gastrointestinal Nursing Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Nursing is the leading journal for nurses working in gastroenterology, hepatology and stoma care. The journal publishes original research, clinical reviews and case studies that have been peer-reviewed by leading experts in the field, as well as news and expert analysis on best practice, professional development and healthcare policy. Each of the ten issues a year touches on a range of topics, from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), viral hepatitis and colorectal cancer to upper GI endoscopy, parenteral nutrition and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Gastrointestinal Nursing aims to help specialist nurses improve the quality of life of patients by delivering care that is evidence-based, cost-effective and patient-centred.
期刊最新文献
A brief overview of recently published articles on gastroenterology, hepatology and stoma care BSG Live 2024: improving patient outcomes Living with inflammatory bowel disease: a modified photovoice study of adolescent mental health Corridor care: the impact on gastrointestinal nursing Dietary and nursing management of calcium oxalate renal stones in patients with a jejunocolic anastomosis: a narrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1